If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
APS Sucks.
Michael Benveniste :
wrote: Replace? For any one individual, perhaps not. Compete with the L1? Yes, and very successfully at that. The Stylus Epic, Canon S10, and Pentax S4 all capture the same angle of view at f/2.8. Each offers the advantages and disadvantages of its own format. But we're looping here. The key feature of the L1 is it's quality in combination with it's size. As I stated earlier, if you're scanning a whole roll APS is more convenient. But I read your response as saying the faster scan time was the reason, which doesn't make sense. No, I always want to scan the roll. We're living in the digital age :-) the L1 for a reasonable (that means: reasonable to me) price, I will quickly replace it. When the films in my fridge are empty in some years, I will replace the SLR. But there is really no need to hurry. Cool. No one is asking you to change. I really want to. Digital is the maximum ease of use, IMO. But it's still too expensive for the extra it provides to me. I really wonder why a lot of people spend 300 Euro for digital point and shoot these days who would never ever have been willing to spend the same amount in a classic camera. People who often gain close to nothing from digital. It must be the coolish effect of digital technology. It's always the masses who influence the markets. So I would have to care for everything. Only the markets for goods and services which impact you. You can ignore a lot of the impact. For example I'm not scared by the dead of APS. I really know people who switched to 35mm because the realised that APS is a dying format. In 3-4 years they will switch again to digital. And they even don't have to fill the fridge, they are just using the consumer ISO 200 films anyway. Those will last longest. And it can be nice to use a dying format: I have the fridge full of decent slide film I've bought for 5 Euros the roll. All three formats are feeling the impact today, as Kodak's quarterly report shows. APS is getting hurt the hardest, though. The camera dealers hate APS. Reasons are simple: It brought high cost for them. Neither the camera dealers nor the camera manufacturers were willing to push the format on their cost, so it had to loose against the cheaper 35mm. Since medium format is predominantly a pro format, and the workflow advantages of digital are greatest for professionals, I expect medium format to lose market share at least as fast as 35mm. Here in the U.S., wedding photographers have embraced digital at an astounding rate. Here in germany, wedding fotographers used 35mm before switching to digital. Same goes for journalists and other professionals. Only in studios medium format was used professionally. Everywhere else, 35mm was used for it's easy handling compared to medium format. 35mm will loose 100% of the point and shoot market. It will loose most of the hobbyists. This will make it more expensive. The day it's close to beeing as expensive as middle format, the amateurs will flee from 35mm. Let's come back here in 3 years and see who was guessing best :-) Once Canon has gotten all the cream out of the market this Christmas season, Nikon will follow suit with a "me too" offering, probably based on the N75. Given the pattern of the last 15 years or so, you expected anything different? Not really. But I will keep complaining some years that there is no Pronea SD I can use my IX-lenses on. And everyone will believe Kodak and Olympus had the brilliant idea to use smaller lenses and smaller "negatives" to get smaller and lighter cameras... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bestbuy sucks | [email protected] | Film & Labs | 3 | February 4th 04 03:00 AM |