Should all smokers be taken out and shot?

On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:56:34 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

I picked up a prime lens today, an older used one. I noticed the lens
had a light blue coating, which was odd as this prime's coatings are
usually brown-purple. At home, I gave the lens a swipe with a lens
tissue, and it looked like part of the coating "rubbed off." Turns
out, the lens was covered in a layer of tobacco smoke residue. The
whole lens was coated with it. When I cleaned the entire front
element surface, sure enough, the correct coating colour was revealed.
It took an hour to clean the thing. Luckily, the inside and the back
of the lens were ok, likely because it was inside the camera body.
I'm glad I didn't have to see the camera. But I've seen this before
on optics. How can anyone do this to a camera?

Except for the FACT that condensation from tobacco smoke is a
brownish-yellow, not "light blue". A mistake perhaps from thinking that
just because tobacco smoke looks bluish in air that it should look the same
condensed on surfaces? Or is it just because you're a ****ing moron
control-freak that wants parrot the "second-hand smoke kills" nonsense
started by useless idiots that was proved totally untrue.

Many substances outgas. (This is why it's so very difficult to pull
lab-level vacuums, .0001 torr, in a low-pressure system, from the
vapor-pressure of all the components in the system.) Do you have a DVD
recorder/player for your entertainment set that started to report lots of
recording errors or failing to load DVDs? The heat from the laser causes
plasticines to outgas from the discs and the lubricants used in the
carriage assembly. Wipe the haze off the laser lens and you're good to go.
OH, and that condensation from outgassing compounds IS a light-blue color.

One more important thing.

YOU'RE A ****INGLY USELESS MORON TROLL.

That's no guess from your color, that's a FACT.

On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 00:17:54 -0700 (PDT), Rich wrote:

On Aug 8, 1:30*am, Outing Trolls is FUN! wrote:
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:56:34 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote:

I picked up a prime lens today, an older used one. *I noticed the lens
had a light blue coating, which was odd as this prime's coatings are
usually brown-purple. *At home, I gave the lens a swipe with a lens
tissue, and it looked like part of the coating "rubbed off." *Turns
out, the lens was covered in a layer of tobacco smoke residue. *The
whole lens was coated with it. *When I cleaned the entire front
element surface, sure enough, the correct coating colour was revealed.
It took an hour to clean the thing. Luckily, the inside and the back
of the lens were ok, likely because it was inside the camera body.
I'm glad I didn't have to see the camera. *But I've seen this before
on optics. *How can anyone do this to a camera?

Except for the FACT that condensation from tobacco smoke is a
brownish-yellow, not "light blue". A mistake perhaps from thinking that
just because tobacco smoke looks bluish in air that it should look the same
condensed on surfaces? Or is it just because you're a ****ing moron
control-freak that wants parrot the "second-hand smoke kills" nonsense
started by useless idiots that was proved totally untrue.

Many substances outgas. (This is why it's so very difficult to pull
lab-level vacuums, .0001 torr, in a low-pressure system, from the
vapor-pressure of all the components in the system.) Do you have a DVD
recorder/player for your entertainment set that started to report lots of
recording errors or failing to load DVDs? The heat from the laser causes
plasticines to outgas from the discs and the lubricants used in the
carriage assembly. Wipe the haze off the laser lens and you're good to go.
OH, and that condensation from outgassing compounds IS a light-blue color.

One more important thing.

YOU'RE A ****INGLY USELESS MORON TROLL.

That's no guess from your color, that's a FACT.

The coating was browish yellow. It combined with the lens coating
colour to create the bluish coating I saw. But what came off was
brownish yellow.

Try again TROLL. You would have said that in the first place. LIE much?

You ****ingly useless TROLL. Not getting enough attention so now you're
going to bring in the pro vs. anti smoker bull**** too into a photography
forum too, eh?

LOL!

You are *SO* ****ingly transparent as a useless mother****ing TROLL.

LOL!

hahaha not all of them....! maybe just some of them..but i wonder if smoking is bad for us why cant they banned all factories that make cigarettes????they dont have to banned the vendors but they have to banned the factory owners first....