Dpreview post many have waited for

"RichA" wrote in message
...
On Nov 26, 6:59 am, Mike wrote:
On Nov 26, 6:01 am, RichA wrote:



Robert Coe wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:48:20 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote:
: On Nov 25, 12:33 am, nospam wrote:
: In article , Rich
:
: wrote:
: The thread might be gone by the time you try to read it, but
silence
: speaks volumes. They guy is right about some of the more
prolific
: posters, especially the chip-on-the-shoulder, always defensive
because
: of the tiny 4/3rds sensor types.
:
: the fact that you are reposting that garbage here suggests that it
is
: *you* who signed up as 'hercules' and posted it in just about
every
: forum.
:
: Hardly. I just applaud the guy for attacking the thin-skinned,
fanboy
: children in those forums.

By what convoluted logic does that puerile rant qualify as an
"attack"? It
lacks any substantive examples of the incompetence and fraud it seems
to
allege. At best it's a diatribe; at worst it's gibberish.

Bob

The idea was to broad-brush certain members of forums without naming
them all and starting 100 brush fires in the process. Fact is, the
guy makes good points and it all boils down to one cause: That too
many hotheads are TOO emotionally involved with their particular
equipment. They need to be reminded that a camera is a tool or a toy
and NOT a lover.

Ha ha ha ha ha. You utter hypocrite.
Canon this.
Plastic that.

Physician heal thyself

Difference is, I'm not defending the indefensible, making up
attributes for products to minimize faults. In other words, unlike
them, I have no blind faith in any system and I recognize flaws in
those systems for what they a flaws.

Yes, you are the ultimate anti-fanboi, you hate and distrust everything as
if ther is an aganda against you in particular.