If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
F/1 Noctilux vs the C/ V 35/1.2 Nokton ?
Sample images?
Patrick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Patrick" wrote in message
news Sample images? Patrick Would you like fries and a beverage with that order sir? Signed, me |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
cameron writes:
Those are lovely nightshots. What were the settings? I believe the artist shot was around 1/30 of a second nearly wide open (f/1.4 or f/1). The Moulin Rouge shot was on faster film and it was more brightly lit, so it was more like f/2 at 1/30. How do you like Portra 800 vs. NPZ? (My NPZ scans have much more grain than your color shot.) NPZ is harder to find and I haven't really tried it. Portra 800 is pretty good, and it scans very well, like all the Portra films. Portra 400BW has extraordinarily fine grain, which is nice, and although it lacks contrast in most shots, this is an advantage for night shots, which are often stunning. It's like a poor man's Technical Pan, only much faster (ISO 400 vs. ISO 25 for most pictorial uses of Tech Pan). Portra 400UC is a great color negative film, with almost the image quality of slides in many cases--good contrast and saturation, good response to artificial light, and it scans very well. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks! Have to try dem both.
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... cameron writes: Those are lovely nightshots. What were the settings? I believe the artist shot was around 1/30 of a second nearly wide open (f/1.4 or f/1). The Moulin Rouge shot was on faster film and it was more brightly lit, so it was more like f/2 at 1/30. How do you like Portra 800 vs. NPZ? (My NPZ scans have much more grain than your color shot.) NPZ is harder to find and I haven't really tried it. Portra 800 is pretty good, and it scans very well, like all the Portra films. Portra 400BW has extraordinarily fine grain, which is nice, and although it lacks contrast in most shots, this is an advantage for night shots, which are often stunning. It's like a poor man's Technical Pan, only much faster (ISO 400 vs. ISO 25 for most pictorial uses of Tech Pan). Portra 400UC is a great color negative film, with almost the image quality of slides in many cases--good contrast and saturation, good response to artificial light, and it scans very well. -- Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|