If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
An Interesting Fact About Digital Cameras and the Human Eye
Typical digital cameras have a resolution of about 8 megapixels these
days. Just a few years ago, one, or three-megapixel resolution was typical. The human eye has a resolution of approximately 137 megapixels. It's not quite a linear comparison, since our eyes have much higher resolution in the central area than at the edges. Still, you can imagine that soon cameras will be more sensitive than the human eye. - from the Technology section of www.odd-info.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
An Interesting Fact About Digital Cameras and the Human Eye
On Sep 23, 12:47 pm, javawizard wrote:
It's not quite a linear comparison That was the only vaguely sensible thing spamboy said. It's a completely meaningless comparison. The eye doesn't work like a camera at all. And you are just spamming what is almost certainly a complete-waste-of- time-website. So, FOAD, would you? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
An Interesting Fact About Digital Cameras and the Human Eye
javawizard wrote:
Typical digital cameras have a resolution of about 8 megapixels these days. Just a few years ago, one, or three-megapixel resolution was typical. The human eye has a resolution of approximately 137 megapixels. It's not quite a linear comparison, since our eyes have much higher resolution in the central area than at the edges. Still, you can imagine that soon cameras will be more sensitive than the human eye. - from the Technology section of www.odd-info.com Nice post. Thanks for that and the interesting link. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
An Interesting Fact About Digital Cameras and the Human Eye
On Sep 22, 9:47 pm, javawizard wrote:
Typical digital cameras have a resolution of about 8 megapixels these days. Just a few years ago, one, or three-megapixel resolution was typical. The human eye has a resolution of approximately 137 megapixels. It's not quite a linear comparison, since our eyes have much higher resolution in the central area than at the edges. Still, you can imagine that soon cameras will be more sensitive than the human eye. - from the Technology section ofwww.odd-info.com In the earliest days of CCD photography people tried to make such non- rectangular pattern image chips. The results were very problematic. One of the key methods of IC layout these days is the use of repeating cells. That is not usable with a variable pitch photomosaic. Also the electrical characteristics of the detector cell depends on size- if we have a variable size detector/well, it is very hard to normalize. The main reason for these efforts were helmet mounted displays and helmet sights. I can see no great reason to try overly hard to develop such focal planes for digital photography, since most people want to scan their eyes over a print. Do you really want prints with sharp centers and fuzzy edges? Actually, I have seen some lenses that do a pretty good job of simulating that anyway. :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
An Interesting Fact About Digital Cameras and the Human Eye
"javawizard" wrote in message ps.com... Typical digital cameras have a resolution of about 8 megapixels these days. Just a few years ago, one, or three-megapixel resolution was typical. The human eye has a resolution of approximately 137 megapixels. It's not quite a linear comparison, since our eyes have much higher resolution in the central area than at the edges. Still, you can imagine that soon cameras will be more sensitive than the human eye. - from the Technology section of www.odd-info.com Your logic and your arithmetic need a little improvement. Around 2000 digicams had 2 Megapixels. Now in 2007 a lot have 10 Mp. The rate of increase seems to be around 1 Mp per year, so assuming that rate of increase is consant your "soon" looks a bit more like100 years. Roy G |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
An Interesting Fact About Digital Cameras and the Human Eye
Roy G wrote:
"javawizard" wrote in message ps.com... Typical digital cameras have a resolution of about 8 megapixels these days. Just a few years ago, one, or three-megapixel resolution was typical. The human eye has a resolution of approximately 137 megapixels. It's not quite a linear comparison, since our eyes have much higher resolution in the central area than at the edges. Still, you can imagine that soon cameras will be more sensitive than the human eye. - from the Technology section of www.odd-info.com Your logic and your arithmetic need a little improvement. Around 2000 digicams had 2 Megapixels. Now in 2007 a lot have 10 Mp. The rate of increase seems to be around 1 Mp per year, so assuming that rate of increase is consant your "soon" looks a bit more like100 years. Roy G At the moment, unless someone comes out with quantum based sensors, the only way to make the sensors work well with more pixels is to make larger sensors, which means different lens systems, and, probably, larger cameras. Does anyone but a professional NEED a 30mp camera? I do pretty well with 4-7mp. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
An Interesting Fact About Digital Cameras and the Human Eye
Roy G wrote:
"javawizard" wrote in message ps.com... Typical digital cameras have a resolution of about 8 megapixels these days. Just a few years ago, one, or three-megapixel resolution was typical. The human eye has a resolution of approximately 137 megapixels. It's not quite a linear comparison, since our eyes have much higher resolution in the central area than at the edges. Still, you can imagine that soon cameras will be more sensitive than the human eye. - from the Technology section of www.odd-info.com Your logic and your arithmetic need a little improvement. Around 2000 digicams had 2 Megapixels. Now in 2007 a lot have 10 Mp. The rate of increase seems to be around 1 Mp per year, so assuming that rate of increase is consant your "soon" looks a bit more like100 years. The rate of increase is extremely likely to be exponential, not linear. See "Moore's Law", which although derived specifically for computer processors and memory, will apply to any technology deriving from silicon real-estate transistor density, such as digital camera sensors and associated memory and processing. -- Chris Malcolm DoD #205 IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
An Interesting Fact About Digital Cameras and the Human Eye
Chris Malcolm wrote:
Roy G wrote: "javawizard" wrote in message ps.com... Typical digital cameras have a resolution of about 8 megapixels these days. Just a few years ago, one, or three-megapixel resolution was typical. The human eye has a resolution of approximately 137 megapixels. It's not quite a linear comparison, since our eyes have much higher resolution in the central area than at the edges. Still, you can imagine that soon cameras will be more sensitive than the human eye. - from the Technology section of www.odd-info.com Your logic and your arithmetic need a little improvement. Around 2000 digicams had 2 Megapixels. Now in 2007 a lot have 10 Mp. The rate of increase seems to be around 1 Mp per year, so assuming that rate of increase is consant your "soon" looks a bit more like100 years. The rate of increase is extremely likely to be exponential, not linear. See "Moore's Law", which although derived specifically for computer processors and memory, will apply to any technology deriving from silicon real-estate transistor density, such as digital camera sensors and associated memory and processing. There is far more to consider than MP. If your digicam has the same old cheap lens there will be little gain beyond a certain point. I have plenty of cheap 5-10MP still cameras that have far less image quality than others with half they MP and better glass. Image stabilization is also a factor along with file format and post processing in determining the final output of a good video or photo. A fast car won't smooth out a bump in the road. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
An Interesting Fact About Digital Cameras and the Human Eye
Jonathan wrote:
Chris Malcolm wrote: Roy G wrote: "javawizard" wrote in message ps.com... Typical digital cameras have a resolution of about 8 megapixels these days. Just a few years ago, one, or three-megapixel resolution was typical. The human eye has a resolution of approximately 137 megapixels. It's not quite a linear comparison, since our eyes have much higher resolution in the central area than at the edges. Still, you can imagine that soon cameras will be more sensitive than the human eye. - from the Technology section of www.odd-info.com Your logic and your arithmetic need a little improvement. Around 2000 digicams had 2 Megapixels. Now in 2007 a lot have 10 Mp. The rate of increase seems to be around 1 Mp per year, so assuming that rate of increase is consant your "soon" looks a bit more like100 years. The rate of increase is extremely likely to be exponential, not linear. See "Moore's Law", which although derived specifically for computer processors and memory, will apply to any technology deriving from silicon real-estate transistor density, such as digital camera sensors and associated memory and processing. There is far more to consider than MP. If your digicam has the same old cheap lens there will be little gain beyond a certain point. I have plenty of cheap 5-10MP still cameras that have far less image quality than others with half they MP and better glass. Image stabilization is also a factor along with file format and post processing in determining the final output of a good video or photo. But all of those things you mention are technological problems which have already been solved, so they're not going to slow down the rate at which these new cameras arrive on the market. -- Chris Malcolm DoD #205 IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
An Interesting Fact About Digital Cameras and the Human Eye
On Sep 27, 2:42 pm, Chris Malcolm wrote:
Roy G wrote: "javawizard" wrote in message ups.com... Typical digital cameras have a resolution of about 8 megapixels these days. Just a few years ago, one, or three-megapixel resolution was typical. The human eye has a resolution of approximately 137 megapixels. It's not quite a linear comparison, since our eyes have much higher resolution in the central area than at the edges. Still, you can imagine that soon cameras will be more sensitive than the human eye. - from the Technology section ofwww.odd-info.com Your logic and your arithmetic need a little improvement. Around 2000 digicams had 2 Megapixels. Now in 2007 a lot have 10 Mp. The rate of increase seems to be around 1 Mp per year, so assuming that rate of increase is consant your "soon" looks a bit more like100 years. The rate of increase is extremely likely to be exponential, not linear. See "Moore's Law", which although derived specifically for computer processors and memory, will apply to any technology deriving from silicon real-estate transistor density, such as digital camera sensors and associated memory and processing. -- Chris Malcolm DoD #205 IPAB, Informatics, JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK [http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/] But Moore's law involved methods of photolithography, where the wavelength used was not really a factor as far as results. UV or even ebeam was fine as long as the photoresist was happy. Unless we want UV or X-ray cameras, the wavelength of the light we are using DOES make a difference. Imaging chips for VISIBLE wavelength do run into some restrictions that Moore's law does not worry about. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
interesting article on buying cameras | gll | Photographing Nature | 0 | November 30th 05 11:24 PM |
Human eye so much better than digital sensors | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 10 | July 13th 05 09:42 PM |
51% likes him FACT! Was: 49% of America HATES GW Bush!! This is a fact | Gary P | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | November 5th 04 03:10 PM |
51% likes him FACT! Was: 49% of America HATES GW Bush!! This is a fact | Gary P | Digital Photography | 0 | November 5th 04 03:09 PM |
Interesting fact LCD panels... | Mark M | Digital Photography | 18 | August 28th 04 02:48 AM |