Was this photoshopped

Saw this image on FB

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151724122925739&set=a.10150452358 000739.424410.189143795738&type=1&ref=nf

--
PeterN

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:10:21 -0400, PeterN wrote:

Saw this image on FB

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?
fbid=10151724122925739&set=a.10150452358000739.424 410.189143795738&type=1&ref=nf

I think the subject is just monkeying around.

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:10:21 -0400, PeterN,
expounded
this theory:

Saw this image on FB

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151724122925739&set=a.10150452358 000739.424410.189143795738&type=1&ref=nf

Definitly Photoshoped.

The fingers on either hand are not actually gripping the camera. With
it's right paw the fingers aren't wrapped around far enough to be
gripping the camera and there is no way that the left paw is holding
anything.

--
Graham
Comments and criticism welcome
http://www.lodeway.com

On 6/6/2013 4:11 PM, Dave wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:10:21 -0400, PeterN wrote:

Saw this image on FB

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?
fbid=10151724122925739&set=a.10150452358000739.424 410.189143795738&type=1&ref=nf

I think the subject is just monkeying around.


Gives a whole new meaning to chimping.

The image just cracked me up.

--
PeterN

On 6/6/13 PDT 1:10 PM, PeterN wrote:

Saw this image on FB

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151724122925739&set=a.10150452358 000739.424410.189143795738&type=1&ref=nf

Yes, photoshopped and not terribly well.

On 6/6/13 3:10 PM, in article
, "PeterN"
wrote:


Saw this image on FB

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...0150452358 00
0739.424410.189143795738&type=1&ref=nf

OF COURSE NOT!

It is a well known fact that Nikon is the preferred brand of all Primates.

;-0

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:10:21 -0400, PeterN
wrote:
:
: Saw this image on FB
:
: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151724122925739&set=a.10150452358 000739.424410.189143795738&type=1&ref=nf

No, of course not. The picture is of a chimp chimping. It's what they do. How
can you possibly question the accuracy or authenticity of that shot?

Bob

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:10:21 -0400, PeterN
wrote:
:
: Saw this image on FB
:
: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151724122925739&set=a.10150452358 000739.424410.189143795738&type=1&ref=nf

No, of course not. The picture is of a chimp chimping. It's what they do. How
can you possibly question the accuracy or authenticity of that shot?

Except that it's not a chimp.

In article , "MC"
wrote:

Saw this image on FB


https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...0150452358 00
0739.424410.189143795738&type=1&ref=nf

OF COURSE NOT!

It is a well known fact that Nikon is the preferred brand of all
Primates.

;-0

Nikon for monkeys, Canon for real photograpers.

Eh, what...? )


MC

Ehm, humans are primates.


--
Sandman[.net]

On 6/7/13 10:58 AM, in article
, "Whisky-dave"
wrote:

On Thursday, June 6, 2013 9:21:59 PM UTC+1, Graham wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:10:21 -0400, PeterN,

expounded

this theory:



Saw this image on FB



https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...=a.10150452358
000739.424410.189143795738&type=1&ref=nf



Definitly Photoshoped.

Is that a fact, it looks fake to me, but can you tell if photoshop did it.
Maybe it was gimped or perhasp another application was used.
everyone uses the term photshop like others use teh term hoovering for
cleaning, personally I dyson .

if we keep saying photoshop then no wonder adobe can charge a lot for it
because people won't believe there are other ways of doing it.


Happens all of the time: "Kleenex", "Xerox", and "Scotch Tape" are but a few
of the adopted terms...



The fingers on either hand are not actually gripping the camera. With

it's right paw the fingers aren't wrapped around far enough to be

gripping the camera and there is no way that the left paw is holding

anything.

It also looks a littleodd because I think the camera would be to heavy to be
held by the monkey as shown.