If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking recommendation for Laptop (Windows) suitable for photography
On 10/8/2012 7:09 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: My main objection to that display is the glassy finish. While your images will look good, you want to consider glare and lowered ability to see tonal differences n the darker portions of your images. (If that is important to you.) it's not as glossy as other glossy displays (definitely less than other macbooks), but unfortunately, glossy is what sells. Perhaps, but not to me. -- Peter |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking recommendation for Laptop (Windows) suitable for photography
In article , Gordon Freeman
wrote: My main objection to that display is the glassy finish. While your images will look good, you want to consider glare and lowered ability to see tonal differences n the darker portions of your images. (If that is important to you.) it's not as glossy as other glossy displays (definitely less than other macbooks), but unfortunately, glossy is what sells. I find it hard to believe anyone would consider a glossy screen a selling point, I assumed it was a technical limitation of some screen types. I have a netbook with a glossy screen and it is a royal pain, when I want to watch a video I instead find myself watching my own reflection. i agree, but it's what sells. apple used to make both glossy and matte, then they offered matte as an option and now it's glossy only. many competitors are glossy. there are definitely those who want matte, but not as many as who buy glossy (or they don't care what they get). glossy has more zing to it, but the glare can be a problem. as i said, the retina macbook is not as glossy as some other glossy displays, but it's definitely not matte. Do retina screen have good viewing angles like IPS panels? the retina display *is* an ips panel, the same as a desktop ips display. Netbook screens have terrible viewing angles, it's hard to see the whole screen without part of it being too dark or light. The same is true of an Acer pocket PC I have which has a Retina-resolution VGA screen (220ppi), its sharpness is wonderful but it has uneven brightness across the screen if you hold it too close. that's one way they get the price so low, by using crappy displays. some are really quite bad. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking recommendation for Laptop (Windows) suitable for photography
On 2012-10-08 20:46:50 +0000, ray said:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:18:34 -0600, Wally wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:48:22 -0400, nospam wrote: In article , Wally wrote: Am retiring the old ThinkPad and looking for a replacement. The new PC laptop should be fast enough to run Lightroom v4. And the display should be suitable for photography -- wide screen NOT preferred but may be OK as long as it has approx 1050 pixels or more vertically. (The old display was 1400x1050). It would be nice if the new computer was not too heavy, not too expensive, decent battery life, big HD, etc... but the most important requirements seems to me are speed for the software, and the display. for the best display, it's the macbook pro with retina display. the pixel density is higher than what your eye can resolve, so you won't be able to see any jaggies, at all. for less money, there's the normal macbook pro, and for less weight, the macbook air. lightroom will run extremely well on any of them. battery life can be as much as 10 hours on a single charge, depending on which model and what you do. hard drive is however big you want. you can always swap in a larger drive later. i'd also wait a week or so, as there are rumours of some new models coming soon. That's the second recommendation for the Retina. I thought you had to have religion to buy a Mac. But I have to admit the display looks amazing. It's expensive but not totally out of reach. Browsing a bit on the web reveals there are Retina issues with software support and some other things. Will keep an eye on this... Wally A knowledgeable tech should be able to install MS on it for you if that's what you really want. You don't need a knowledgeable tech or any tech at all. All Macs can run Windows. Just buy the Windows of your choice and follow the instructions to use Bootcamp. That requires you reboot the computer whenever you change from Mac OS to Windows. If you want less hassle, buy Parallels or similar. It's not a "simulation" the way older Macs ran Windows. Macs use the same Intel processors that Windows boxes use, and run it natively. You just have to pay extra for it and install it according to instructions. I use Windows XP on my iMac when I have to link to my office, whose software is proprietary and runs only on Windows, so I have about a 10 gig partition for that, set it up under Bootcamp, and just restart in Windows whenever I need to use it. -- Michael |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking recommendation for Laptop (Windows) suitable for photography
In article , ray
wrote: A knowledgeable tech should be able to install MS on it for you if that's what you really want. knowledgeable tech? seriously? you must be kidding. anyone can install windows on a mac (or a windows pc for that matter). all that's needed is double-click boot camp assistant for dual booting or get vmware/parallels for virtualization. you can even do both. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking recommendation for Laptop (Windows) suitable for photography
On 2012-10-08 22:00:30 -0700, nospam said:
In article , ray wrote: A knowledgeable tech should be able to install MS on it for you if that's what you really want. knowledgeable tech? seriously? you must be kidding. anyone can install windows on a mac (or a windows pc for that matter). all that's needed is double-click boot camp assistant for dual booting or get vmware/parallels for virtualization. you can even do both. Yup! I have VMware Fusion installed along with XP SP3. Office 2003 Pro runs flawlessly, and I find it functions absolutely transparently. The advantage of using VMWare Fusion over BootCamp, is being able to have both OSs running at the same time and being able to drag and drop files between both OSs. Using Open Spaces I can easily move between an OSX and an XP environment. However once you gave me the clue to running to running Mac Office X on an Intel Mac, I have had little reason to boot XP lately. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking recommendation for Laptop (Windows) suitable for photography
On 10/8/2012 10:58 PM, Gordon Freeman wrote:
nospam wrote: In article , PeterN wrote: My main objection to that display is the glassy finish. While your images will look good, you want to consider glare and lowered ability to see tonal differences n the darker portions of your images. (If that is important to you.) it's not as glossy as other glossy displays (definitely less than other macbooks), but unfortunately, glossy is what sells. I find it hard to believe anyone would consider a glossy screen a selling point, I assumed it was a technical limitation of some screen types. I have a netbook with a glossy screen and it is a royal pain, when I want to watch a video I instead find myself watching my own reflection. Do retina screen have good viewing angles like IPS panels? Netbook screens have terrible viewing angles, it's hard to see the whole screen without part of it being too dark or light. The same is true of an Acer pocket PC I have which has a Retina-resolution VGA screen (220ppi), its sharpness is wonderful but it has uneven brightness across the screen if you hold it too close. the best way is not to believe the VS. Go look at the screens,so you can understand what I was talking about earlier. BTW My Think Pad, which is an old model is still decent for PS CS6, although a tad slow. I can't use it for critical work, but for rough edits, it works for me. -- Peter |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking recommendation for Laptop (Windows) suitable for photography
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:58:13 -0400, PeterN
wrote: BTW My Think Pad, which is an old model is still decent for PS CS6, although a tad slow. I can't use it for critical work, but for rough edits, it works for me. I've got the T61. Haven't tried PS or LR, but it runs Picasa v3.3 so slow, I had to uninstall it and and go back to v3.0. Wally |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking recommendation for Laptop (Windows) suitable for photography
On 10/9/2012 10:31 AM, Wally wrote:
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:58:13 -0400, PeterN wrote: BTW My Think Pad, which is an old model is still decent for PS CS6, although a tad slow. I can't use it for critical work, but for rough edits, it works for me. I've got the T61. Haven't tried PS or LR, but it runs Picasa v3.3 so slow, I had to uninstall it and and go back to v3.0. I use mine mainly when I travel. I like to download files from my cards to a portable HD. And I can also do rough edits. the keyboard, battery and fan are on the way out. However, while it is not very fast, it serves my purpose. -- Peter |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking recommendation for Laptop (Windows) suitable forphotography
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 00:47:48 -0400, Michael wrote:
On 2012-10-08 20:46:50 +0000, ray said: On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:18:34 -0600, Wally wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:48:22 -0400, nospam wrote: In article , Wally wrote: Am retiring the old ThinkPad and looking for a replacement. The new PC laptop should be fast enough to run Lightroom v4. And the display should be suitable for photography -- wide screen NOT preferred but may be OK as long as it has approx 1050 pixels or more vertically. (The old display was 1400x1050). It would be nice if the new computer was not too heavy, not too expensive, decent battery life, big HD, etc... but the most important requirements seems to me are speed for the software, and the display. for the best display, it's the macbook pro with retina display. the pixel density is higher than what your eye can resolve, so you won't be able to see any jaggies, at all. for less money, there's the normal macbook pro, and for less weight, the macbook air. lightroom will run extremely well on any of them. battery life can be as much as 10 hours on a single charge, depending on which model and what you do. hard drive is however big you want. you can always swap in a larger drive later. i'd also wait a week or so, as there are rumours of some new models coming soon. That's the second recommendation for the Retina. I thought you had to have religion to buy a Mac. But I have to admit the display looks amazing. It's expensive but not totally out of reach. Browsing a bit on the web reveals there are Retina issues with software support and some other things. Will keep an eye on this... Wally A knowledgeable tech should be able to install MS on it for you if that's what you really want. You don't need a knowledgeable tech or any tech at all. All Macs can run Windows. Just buy the Windows of your choice and follow the instructions to use Bootcamp. That requires you reboot the computer whenever you change from Mac OS to Windows. If you want less hassle, buy Parallels or similar. It's not a "simulation" the way older Macs ran Windows. Macs use the same Intel processors that Windows boxes use, and run it natively. You just have to pay extra for it and install it according to instructions. I use Windows XP on my iMac when I have to link to my office, whose software is proprietary and runs only on Windows, so I have about a 10 gig partition for that, set it up under Bootcamp, and just restart in Windows whenever I need to use it. Yeah, whatever. The point is that you don't have to run the MAC OS on the MAC computer. Personally, I don't use MAC or MS. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Seeking recommendation for Laptop (Windows) suitable for photography
In article , ray
wrote: A knowledgeable tech should be able to install MS on it for you if that's what you really want. You don't need a knowledgeable tech or any tech at all. All Macs can run Windows. Just buy the Windows of your choice and follow the instructions to use Bootcamp. That requires you reboot the computer whenever you change from Mac OS to Windows. If you want less hassle, buy Parallels or similar. It's not a "simulation" the way older Macs ran Windows. Macs use the same Intel processors that Windows boxes use, and run it natively. You just have to pay extra for it and install it according to instructions. I use Windows XP on my iMac when I have to link to my office, whose software is proprietary and runs only on Windows, so I have about a 10 gig partition for that, set it up under Bootcamp, and just restart in Windows whenever I need to use it. Yeah, whatever. The point is that you don't have to run the MAC OS on the MAC computer. why buy a mac, if not to run mac os? Personally, I don't use MAC or MS. your loss. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seeking a recommendation | Jeff Williams | Digital Photography | 3 | April 27th 05 02:21 PM |
Laptop Photography | FoulDragon | Digital Photography | 2 | January 23rd 05 10:38 PM |
Seeking recommendation for used SLR gears | S. S. | 35mm Photo Equipment | 186 | December 10th 04 01:18 AM |
Seeking recommendation for used SLR gears | S. S. | Other Photographic Equipment | 4 | November 30th 04 07:10 PM |
A suitable laptop that can email photographs directly? | Mr.Will | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | July 5th 03 01:45 AM |