If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sigma forced to admit lens is grossly overpriced
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:41:37 -0800 (PST), RichA
wrote: "Very popular lens" needs sales "incenting?" More like, silly Sigma tries to charge what Nikon and Canon do for a zoom and gets kicked in the face by indifference. Given the choice, new Sigma or used Nikon 70-200mm, guess which most Nikon owners will choose? Dpreview Sigma drops price for 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM lens Sigma has announced a price drop for its 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM lens to $1,399, down from $1,699. The company says 'the reason the price went down is to remain competitive in this category and incent sales for this very popular lens. Sigma? Just guessing here. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sigma, tired of LYING about resolution, admit they needed more | Rich[_6_] | Digital Photography | 126 | October 19th 10 01:28 PM |
Sigma, tired of LYING about resolution, admit they needed more | TheRealSteve | Digital SLR Cameras | 5 | October 16th 10 11:49 PM |
Sigma, tired of LYING about resolution, admit they needed more | Wolfgang Weisselberg | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | October 15th 10 07:57 PM |
Sigma, tired of LYING about resolution, admit they needed more | Mr. Strat | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | October 15th 10 01:48 AM |
Sigma, tired of LYING about resolution, admit they needed more | Gary Eickmeier | Digital SLR Cameras | 4 | October 9th 10 07:38 PM |