If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
fire
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:44:04 -0700 (PDT), Peppe wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/giuseppeb/3979154203/ Originality...........? 1/10 First impression......? 0/10 Composition...........? 0/10 Colors................? 1/10 Examples like this are precisely why base-amateur snapshooters love hosting sites like Flickr so much. When they can do something as bad as this matchbox snapshot and get opinion scores of 5 out of 5 or 10 out of 10. Troll Rita should upload some of her dog-**** photos to Flickr, she easily could get perpetual 10 out of 10's there. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
fire
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:10:39 -0500, Ghetta Gryp
wrote: On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:44:04 -0700 (PDT), Peppe wrote: http://www.flickr.com/photos/giuseppeb/3979154203/ Originality...........? 1/10 First impression......? 0/10 Composition...........? 0/10 Colors................? 1/10 Examples like this are precisely why base-amateur snapshooters love hosting sites like Flickr so much. When they can do something as bad as this matchbox snapshot and get opinion scores of 5 out of 5 or 10 out of 10. Troll Rita should upload some of her dog-**** photos to Flickr, she easily could get perpetual 10 out of 10's there. Complete nonsense. There are some very good, very original, shots in that photostream. Those that can, do. Those that can't, denigrate everyone else. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
fire
Ghetta Gryp wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:44:04 -0700 (PDT), Peppe wrote: http://www.flickr.com/photos/giuseppeb/3979154203/ Originality Snipped bits out Peppe- There are a few dismally unhappy people who love to posts insults. Please disregard, but also please say what your purpose in posting is- comments? -- john mcwilliams |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
fire
"John McWilliams" wrote in message ... There are a few dismally unhappy people who love to posts insults. Please disregard, but also please say what your purpose in posting is- comments? John, I basically agree with your response, but I might disagree with your secondary message. 1. CHARTER OF REC.PHOTO.DIGITAL "This group is for the discussion of all aspects of digital photography, including digital cameras, scanners, image manipulation software, printers, and CD-ROM technology." 'All aspects', to me, includes samples taken by digital cameras. Why? because samples can lead to illuminating discussions about the technologies and the applications of those that we are primarily interested in. Worst case: Suppose the OP was merely looking for slaps on the back. So what! Could still be a seed that germinates into a productive discussion (not about the art of photography, or politics) about the applications of the technology we all love and enjoy. If I misjudged your message, I apologize up front. I generally like the examples posted here. They should make a "point" technically speaking, but if they don't then others can step in and add technical illumination. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
fire
Charles wrote:
"John McWilliams" wrote in message ... There are a few dismally unhappy people who love to posts insults. Please disregard, but also please say what your purpose in posting is- comments? John, I basically agree with your response, but I might disagree with your secondary message. 1. CHARTER OF REC.PHOTO.DIGITAL "This group is for the discussion of all aspects of digital photography, including digital cameras, scanners, image manipulation software, printers, and CD-ROM technology." 'All aspects', to me, includes samples taken by digital cameras. Why? because samples can lead to illuminating discussions about the technologies and the applications of those that we are primarily interested in. Worst case: Suppose the OP was merely looking for slaps on the back. So what! Could still be a seed that germinates into a productive discussion (not about the art of photography, or politics) about the applications of the technology we all love and enjoy. If I misjudged your message, I apologize up front. I generally like the examples posted here. They should make a "point" technically speaking, but if they don't then others can step in and add technical illumination. I do find it is helpful to know what posters look for when a link shows up with no "how doya do" at all, from a nym I don't recall. Not necessary, but helpful. -- john mcwilliams |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
fire
"John McWilliams" wrote in message ... Charles wrote: "John McWilliams" wrote in message ... There are a few dismally unhappy people who love to posts insults. Please disregard, but also please say what your purpose in posting is- comments? John, I basically agree with your response, but I might disagree with your secondary message. 1. CHARTER OF REC.PHOTO.DIGITAL "This group is for the discussion of all aspects of digital photography, including digital cameras, scanners, image manipulation software, printers, and CD-ROM technology." 'All aspects', to me, includes samples taken by digital cameras. Why? because samples can lead to illuminating discussions about the technologies and the applications of those that we are primarily interested in. Worst case: Suppose the OP was merely looking for slaps on the back. So what! Could still be a seed that germinates into a productive discussion (not about the art of photography, or politics) about the applications of the technology we all love and enjoy. If I misjudged your message, I apologize up front. I generally like the examples posted here. They should make a "point" technically speaking, but if they don't then others can step in and add technical illumination. I do find it is helpful to know what posters look for when a link shows up with no "how doya do" at all, from a nym I don't recall. Not necessary, but helpful. -- john mcwilliams Without that accompanying text, I don't even click on offered links. A little "What do you think?" or "Is this overexposed?" would help. Otherwise, my assumption is that it's spam, or worse. dwight |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
fire
dwight wrote:
"John McWilliams" wrote in message I do find it is helpful to know what posters look for when a link shows up with no "how doya do" at all, from a nym I don't recall. Not necessary, but helpful. Without that accompanying text, I don't even click on offered links. A little "What do you think?" or "Is this overexposed?" would help. Otherwise, my assumption is that it's spam, or worse. Quite right. A certain poster, well known to this group, at least once posted a photo of dog ****, so I don't go to his photos without extraordinary cause. But kudos to him for not having done it for years now..... -- john mcwilliams |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
fire
Ghetta Gryp wrote:
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 04:44:04 -0700 (PDT), Peppe wrote: http://www.flickr.com/photos/giuseppeb/3979154203/ Originality...........? 1/10 First impression......? 0/10 Composition...........? 0/10 Colors................? 1/10 It's not that bad. It's not very original and it's missing an idea but the colors and composition are okay. -- Ray Fischer |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
fire
So sad that someone like him has no friends, so he has to broadcast his
angst by such postings here. I bet his mother hates him ..... Nice picture BTW. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ship's Tour Of My Universe To Begin - Call To Arms! Duty Stations! Fire When Ready! Cease Fire Procola! Pt. II/III | NICK | Digital Photography | 0 | March 22nd 07 01:47 AM |
Ship's Tour Of My Universe To Begin - Call To Arms! Duty Stations! Fire When Ready! Cease Fire Procola! Pt III/III | NICK | Digital Photography | 0 | March 22nd 07 01:41 AM |
Ship's Tour Of My Universe To Begin - Call To Arms! Duty Stations! Fire When Ready! Cease Fire Procola! Pt. II/III | The Bobert | Digital Photography | 0 | March 21st 07 09:22 PM |
Ship's Tour Of My Universe To Begin - Call To Arms! Duty Stations! Fire When Ready! Cease Fire Procola! Pt. II/III | Charles Schuler | Digital Photography | 6 | March 21st 07 01:20 AM |
B&H fire | Alan Browne | 35mm Photo Equipment | 8 | March 3rd 05 12:12 PM |