Throw away your camera. Tests on Smartphones Shown to Outperform DSLR's!

While the author of http://tinyurl.com/gobdx94 should watch his use of
apostrophes, the reader of the linked article should read the fine
print at the bottom.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

While the author of http://tinyurl.com/gobdx94 should watch his use of
apostrophes, the reader of the linked article should read the fine
print at the bottom.

that's a perfect reason to *not* use a url shortener.

you link redirects to a page at the following site:
http://savinghomeownerstips.com/

the link came up blank but that's probably due to spam-blocking at my
end.

the main page at that site has *nothing* to do with photography.

On 2016-03-11 18:59:59 +0000, nospam said:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

While the author of http://tinyurl.com/gobdx94 should watch his use of
apostrophes, the reader of the linked article should read the fine
print at the bottom.

that's a perfect reason to *not* use a url shortener.

you link redirects to a page at the following site:
http://savinghomeownerstips.com/

the link came up blank but that's probably due to spam-blocking at my
end.

the main page at that site has *nothing* to do with photography.

Yup! That is what I got. A blank page to a spam site.


--
Regards,

Savageduck

On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:59:59 -0500, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

While the author of http://tinyurl.com/gobdx94 should watch his use of
apostrophes, the reader of the linked article should read the fine
print at the bottom.

that's a perfect reason to *not* use a url shortener.

I could have given you
http://savinghomeownerstips.com/hdfx...sid..&s4=hdfx1

you link redirects to a page at the following site:
http://savinghomeownerstips.com/

That's strange. Both the TinyURL and the full address that I have just
given you take me directly to where I intended you to go. I think the
problem is at your end.



the link came up blank but that's probably due to spam-blocking at my
end.

the main page at that site has *nothing* to do with photography.

As you will see, it's not the main page we are after.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

On Mar 11, 2016, Eric Stevens wrote
(in ):

On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:59:59 -0500,
wrote:

In , Eric Stevens
wrote:

While the author of http://tinyurl.com/gobdx94 should watch his use of
apostrophes, the reader of the linked article should read the fine
print at the bottom.

that's a perfect reason to *not* use a url shortener.

I could have given you

http://savinghomeownerstips.com/hdfx...867-4163-8000-


000000000000__vpid..127cd000-e7b3-11e5-8a7b-00d7011a844c__caid..fde875f8-c7f8-


4632-8b86-f43367148810__rt..R__lid..a629195e-eb97-4f2e-a80f-
c752f23ed8bc__oid1

...09271f50-c98c-4792-b467-
c37aac5aba51__var1..hdfx1__rd..news\.\yahoo\.\com_ _a
id..__sid..&s4=hdfx1

you link redirects to a page at the following site:
http://savinghomeownerstips.com/

That's strange. Both the TinyURL and the full address that I have just
given you take me directly to where I intended you to go. I think the
problem is at your end.

Nope! The problem is you are posting a URL to a spam, and email harvesting
site, using bots. Safe browsers and search sites such as Google will use the
“Robots exclusion protocol� and not permit the crawler injected by your
site to access vulnerable date on the computer of the individual attempting
to open the URL.

I get the same result as nospam, a blank, and so does Google who has this to
say:
"A description for this result is not available because of this
site'srobots.txt(http://lifestylesresearchinfo.com/robots.txt)�
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6062608?hl=en&rd=1


the link came up blank but that's probably due to spam-blocking at my
end.

the main page at that site has *nothing* to do with photography.

As you will see, it's not the main page we are after.

As you will see we want nothing to do with that site, main page or any other.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:

While the author of http://tinyurl.com/gobdx94 should watch his use of
apostrophes, the reader of the linked article should read the fine
print at the bottom.

that's a perfect reason to *not* use a url shortener.

I could have given you

http://savinghomeownerstips.com/hdfx...867-4163-8000-
000000000000__vpid..127cd000-e7b3-11e5-8a7b-00d7011a844c__caid..fde875f8-c7f8-
4632-8b86-f43367148810__rt..R__lid..a629195e-eb97-4f2e-a80f-c752f23ed8bc__oid1.
.09271f50-c98c-4792-b467-c37aac5aba51__var1..hdfx1__rd..news\.\yahoo\.\com_ _ai
d..__sid..&s4=hdfx1

that's the same spam link it redirects to.

either way, it's bogus.

you link redirects to a page at the following site:
http://savinghomeownerstips.com/

That's strange. Both the TinyURL and the full address that I have just
given you take me directly to where I intended you to go. I think the
problem is at your end.

nope. the same thing happened to savageduck.

the link came up blank but that's probably due to spam-blocking at my
end.

the main page at that site has *nothing* to do with photography.

As you will see, it's not the main page we are after.

doesn't matter. the site is a spam site.

Eric Stevens Wrote in message:
While the author of http://tinyurl.com/gobdx94 should watch his use of
apostrophes, the reader of the linked article should read the fine
print at the bottom.

This link sort of works for me. Sometimes it opens and then
redirects to the blank page, but it did finally stay on the right
page. Anyway, it even says "advertorial" at the top. The
disclaimer at the bottom is amusing, though. "We made this all
up". Pretty funny.
--

On Mar 11, 2016, Bill W wrote
(in article ):

Eric Wrote in message:
While the author of http://tinyurl.com/gobdx94 should watch his use of
apostrophes, the reader of the linked article should read the fine
print at the bottom.

This link sort of works for me. Sometimes it opens and then
redirects to the blank page, but it did finally stay on the right
page. Anyway, it even says "advertorial" at the top. The
disclaimer at the bottom is amusing, though. "We made this all
up". Pretty funny.

Easily identified as SPAM, and undoubtably a parasitic site.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

Savageduck Wrote in message:
On Mar 11, 2016, Bill W wrote
(in article ):

Eric Wrote in message:
While the author of http://tinyurl.com/gobdx94 should watch his use of
apostrophes, the reader of the linked article should read the fine
print at the bottom.

This link sort of works for me. Sometimes it opens and then
redirects to the blank page, but it did finally stay on the right
page. Anyway, it even says "advertorial" at the top. The
disclaimer at the bottom is amusing, though. "We made this all
up". Pretty funny.

Easily identified as SPAM, and undoubtably a parasitic site.


Absolutely.
--

On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:02:04 -0800, Savageduck
wrote:

On Mar 11, 2016, Eric Stevens wrote
(in ):

On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:59:59 -0500,
wrote:

In , Eric Stevens
wrote:

While the author of http://tinyurl.com/gobdx94 should watch his use of
apostrophes, the reader of the linked article should read the fine
print at the bottom.

that's a perfect reason to *not* use a url shortener.

I could have given you

http://savinghomeownerstips.com/hdfx...867-4163-8000-


000000000000__vpid..127cd000-e7b3-11e5-8a7b-00d7011a844c__caid..fde875f8-c7f8-


4632-8b86-f43367148810__rt..R__lid..a629195e-eb97-4f2e-a80f-
c752f23ed8bc__oid1

..09271f50-c98c-4792-b467-
c37aac5aba51__var1..hdfx1__rd..news\.\yahoo\.\com __a
id..__sid..&s4=hdfx1

you link redirects to a page at the following site:
http://savinghomeownerstips.com/

That's strange. Both the TinyURL and the full address that I have just
given you take me directly to where I intended you to go. I think the
problem is at your end.

Nope! The problem is you are posting a URL to a spam, and email harvesting
site, using bots. Safe browsers and search sites such as Google will use the
“Robots exclusion protocol” and not permit the crawler injected by your
site to access vulnerable date on the computer of the individual attempting
to open the URL.

I get the same result as nospam, a blank, and so does Google who has this to
say:
"A description for this result is not available because of this
site'srobots.txt(http://lifestylesresearchinfo.com/robots.txt)”
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6062608?hl=en&rd=1


the link came up blank but that's probably due to spam-blocking at my
end.

the main page at that site has *nothing* to do with photography.

As you will see, it's not the main page we are after.

As you will see we want nothing to do with that site, main page or any other.

I don't know what is really going on. I opened that site with one of
my working links and copied the line of text "We set our design goals
to make these lenses the finest in the world, bar none". I entered
this in the Google search engine and came up with the web address
"https://hdfx360.com/pre/us/index.html which when I opened it took me
straight to the web site I intended. I would be interested to know
what happens when you try it.
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens