A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pixels per inch in PowerShot A70



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 15th 04, 11:27 PM
Bob
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Pixels per inch in PowerShot A70

I have a Canon PowerShot A70, which works just fine for me in most cases.
However, I am trying to take some photos for a book I am doing, and my
editor says they need them to be 300 pixels per inch. No matter what I do,
I can only get 72 per inch. I set resolution to Large and compression to
Superfine, but it didn't seem to make any difference. If I save the image
as TIF, rather than the default JPEG, it increases the pixel count to 96
pixels, but that's as high as I can get. Anyone have any suggestions?


  #2  
Old December 16th 04, 12:00 AM
Rodrigo C.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The "in camera" resolution doesn't change the dpi count in the picture,
that's only for printing.
you have to change the dpi in a program like photoshop.
I you have it I can tell you how:
open the pic in photoshop, go to "image" menu, then "image size", change the
resolution to 300 pixels/inch, unchek the "Resample image" option, then OK
save the image, it's ready, now you have the same picture in 300 dpi




"Bob" escribió en el mensaje
. com...
I have a Canon PowerShot A70, which works just fine for me in most cases.
However, I am trying to take some photos for a book I am doing, and my
editor says they need them to be 300 pixels per inch. No matter what I do,
I can only get 72 per inch. I set resolution to Large and compression to
Superfine, but it didn't seem to make any difference. If I save the image
as TIF, rather than the default JPEG, it increases the pixel count to 96
pixels, but that's as high as I can get. Anyone have any suggestions?



  #3  
Old December 16th 04, 12:27 AM
Bob Williams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Bob wrote:
I have a Canon PowerShot A70, which works just fine for me in most cases.
However, I am trying to take some photos for a book I am doing, and my
editor says they need them to be 300 pixels per inch. No matter what I do,
I can only get 72 per inch. I set resolution to Large and compression to
Superfine, but it didn't seem to make any difference. If I save the image
as TIF, rather than the default JPEG, it increases the pixel count to 96
pixels, but that's as high as I can get. Anyone have any suggestions?


Ignore the 72 ppi message. It means nothing. It is just a way that the
Camera/Photo Editor does its "bookkeeping".
If you have Photoshop, just set the crop tool to the dimensions you want
the image to be, e.g. 4"x6" and set the resolution to 300 ppi. Then drag
the pointer across your picture until you like the composition and click
ENTER.
PS will automatically crop your image to the exact size you specify and
will resample the image to exactly 300 ppi, in one fell swoop.
If you then go to IMAGE IMAGE SIZE, you will see that your image is
4"x6" and has a resolution of 300 ppi, just as your editor specified.
Bob Williams

  #4  
Old December 16th 04, 12:27 AM
Bob Williams
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Bob wrote:
I have a Canon PowerShot A70, which works just fine for me in most cases.
However, I am trying to take some photos for a book I am doing, and my
editor says they need them to be 300 pixels per inch. No matter what I do,
I can only get 72 per inch. I set resolution to Large and compression to
Superfine, but it didn't seem to make any difference. If I save the image
as TIF, rather than the default JPEG, it increases the pixel count to 96
pixels, but that's as high as I can get. Anyone have any suggestions?


Ignore the 72 ppi message. It means nothing. It is just a way that the
Camera/Photo Editor does its "bookkeeping".
If you have Photoshop, just set the crop tool to the dimensions you want
the image to be, e.g. 4"x6" and set the resolution to 300 ppi. Then drag
the pointer across your picture until you like the composition and click
ENTER.
PS will automatically crop your image to the exact size you specify and
will resample the image to exactly 300 ppi, in one fell swoop.
If you then go to IMAGE IMAGE SIZE, you will see that your image is
4"x6" and has a resolution of 300 ppi, just as your editor specified.
Bob Williams

  #5  
Old December 16th 04, 12:35 AM
Eric Gill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob" wrote in news:VL3wd.60065$QJ3.23355
@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com:

Anyone have any suggestions?


Get a photo editor so you can actually work with your images after they are
shot. It doesn't matter what the resolution is set to coming off the
camera. This can be changed.

  #6  
Old December 16th 04, 01:56 PM
Roland Karlsson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob" wrote in
. com:

I have a Canon PowerShot A70, which works just fine for me in most
cases. However, I am trying to take some photos for a book I am doing,
and my editor says they need them to be 300 pixels per inch. No
matter what I do, I can only get 72 per inch. I set resolution to
Large and compression to Superfine, but it didn't seem to make any
difference. If I save the image as TIF, rather than the default JPEG,
it increases the pixel count to 96 pixels, but that's as high as I can
get. Anyone have any suggestions?


This is a common misunderstanding. The actual truth is that
the PPI (sometimes called DPI) setting for your image is
(almost always) totally uninteresting. You shall ignore it.

Lets say that you want to print a 3x4 inch picture in your book.
Then this picture needs to be 900x1200 pixels, if you shall get
300 pixels per inch. That's all folks. Nothing else matters.

So - if your editor wants exactly 300 PPI, then you have to
rescale the picture in your photo editor to (in the above example)
900x1200 pixels.

But - if your eaditor really means (which is more likely) the the
image shall be 300 PPI or better, then you don't have to rescale at
all as the A70 picures probably really are large enough to print
at 300 PPI in your book.


/Roland
  #7  
Old December 16th 04, 01:56 PM
Roland Karlsson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob" wrote in
. com:

I have a Canon PowerShot A70, which works just fine for me in most
cases. However, I am trying to take some photos for a book I am doing,
and my editor says they need them to be 300 pixels per inch. No
matter what I do, I can only get 72 per inch. I set resolution to
Large and compression to Superfine, but it didn't seem to make any
difference. If I save the image as TIF, rather than the default JPEG,
it increases the pixel count to 96 pixels, but that's as high as I can
get. Anyone have any suggestions?


This is a common misunderstanding. The actual truth is that
the PPI (sometimes called DPI) setting for your image is
(almost always) totally uninteresting. You shall ignore it.

Lets say that you want to print a 3x4 inch picture in your book.
Then this picture needs to be 900x1200 pixels, if you shall get
300 pixels per inch. That's all folks. Nothing else matters.

So - if your editor wants exactly 300 PPI, then you have to
rescale the picture in your photo editor to (in the above example)
900x1200 pixels.

But - if your eaditor really means (which is more likely) the the
image shall be 300 PPI or better, then you don't have to rescale at
all as the A70 picures probably really are large enough to print
at 300 PPI in your book.


/Roland
  #8  
Old December 16th 04, 01:56 PM
Roland Karlsson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Bob" wrote in
. com:

I have a Canon PowerShot A70, which works just fine for me in most
cases. However, I am trying to take some photos for a book I am doing,
and my editor says they need them to be 300 pixels per inch. No
matter what I do, I can only get 72 per inch. I set resolution to
Large and compression to Superfine, but it didn't seem to make any
difference. If I save the image as TIF, rather than the default JPEG,
it increases the pixel count to 96 pixels, but that's as high as I can
get. Anyone have any suggestions?


This is a common misunderstanding. The actual truth is that
the PPI (sometimes called DPI) setting for your image is
(almost always) totally uninteresting. You shall ignore it.

Lets say that you want to print a 3x4 inch picture in your book.
Then this picture needs to be 900x1200 pixels, if you shall get
300 pixels per inch. That's all folks. Nothing else matters.

So - if your editor wants exactly 300 PPI, then you have to
rescale the picture in your photo editor to (in the above example)
900x1200 pixels.

But - if your eaditor really means (which is more likely) the the
image shall be 300 PPI or better, then you don't have to rescale at
all as the A70 picures probably really are large enough to print
at 300 PPI in your book.


/Roland
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pixels per inch for film? RolandRB Medium Format Photography Equipment 13 November 23rd 04 03:15 PM
Stuck pixels on a Canon PowerShot S70 Peter Digital Photography 6 October 20th 04 06:19 PM
Information needed Noname Digital Photography 3 July 15th 04 07:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.