If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
More fun with the Leica M8
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... : Too bad, the M6 and prior Leica's were favoured by combat correspondents : and photogs for their reliability, simplicity, compactness not to : mention image quality. Indeed. All Leica were trying to do was try and maintain the qualities for which they've always been renowed, in the face of the totally different demands being made on the familiar body shape by digital reproduction. It's not particularly edyifying to watch people jumpimg up and down in glee over their failure, in what's turned out to be a difficult if not impossible task. Yes it cost far too much, yes it turned out to be a pile of crap, yes Leica were the Nazis camera of choice, but it was a noble enterprise neverthless IMO. michael adams .... -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
More fun with the Leica M8
ransley wrote:
snip For a camera maker that has been proven for over 80 years to make the best equipment to put out a crap product with several stupid defects, the weak body and lack of proper filter makes one wonder what kind of drunk cheap idiot tested and approved their design. The mistakes were so obvious. Nobody is jumping for glee but rather are happy they didnt mortgage their house for what should have been a great camera, to last their lifetime. Everybody wants one, few can afford one. What is so difficult about making and testing a piece of equipment when that is your business, there are millions of tough little good cameras made every year by many companies. Leica should go out of business for rebadging Panasonics at double the price, the failure of the M8 and Leicas lack of customer support of the issues. At the outragous prices people shelled out these issues should have been fixed free. I am happy I will now never want or consider a Leica body. It makes one wonder if the people who created Windows Vista have bought Leitz. Allen |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
More fun with the Leica M8
"Allen" wrote in message ... ransley wrote: snip For a camera maker that has been proven for over 80 years to make the best equipment to put out a crap product with several stupid defects, the weak body and lack of proper filter makes one wonder what kind of drunk cheap idiot tested and approved their design. The mistakes were so obvious. Nobody is jumping for glee but rather are happy they didnt mortgage their house for what should have been a great camera, to last their lifetime. Everybody wants one, few can afford one. What is so difficult about making and testing a piece of equipment when that is your business, there are millions of tough little good cameras made every year by many companies. Leica should go out of business for rebadging Panasonics at double the price, the failure of the M8 and Leicas lack of customer support of the issues. At the outragous prices people shelled out these issues should have been fixed free. I am happy I will now never want or consider a Leica body. It makes one wonder if the people who created Windows Vista have bought Leitz. Allen And here's the worst part: I have Vista 64 loaded on three machines, none of them have ever failed. All run perfectly. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
More fun with the Leica M8
Bõwser wrote:
"Allen" wrote in message [] It makes one wonder if the people who created Windows Vista have bought Leitz. Allen And here's the worst part: I have Vista 64 loaded on three machines, none of them have ever failed. All run perfectly. Strange that - I had just the same experience with Vista 32 here. Must be something in the mains! David |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
More fun with the Leica M8
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:54:15 GMT, "David J Taylor"
wrote: Bõwser wrote: "Allen" wrote in message [] It makes one wonder if the people who created Windows Vista have bought Leitz. Allen And here's the worst part: I have Vista 64 loaded on three machines, none of them have ever failed. All run perfectly. Strange that - I had just the same experience with Vista 32 here. Must be something in the mains! The most common complaint I hear/see about Vista is not about the stability of the OS, but about compatibility of older programs with this OS. Many of us have older ("older" in the computer sense of being purchased one year or more ago) programs that we don't want to upgrade to fit a new OS. If I was concerned only with the stability/functional aspects of an OS, I'd have no problem buying a new computer with Vista. It's the integration with my extant programs that concern me. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
More fun with the Leica M8
tony cooper wrote:
[] The most common complaint I hear/see about Vista is not about the stability of the OS, but about compatibility of older programs with this OS. Many of us have older ("older" in the computer sense of being purchased one year or more ago) programs that we don't want to upgrade to fit a new OS. If I was concerned only with the stability/functional aspects of an OS, I'd have no problem buying a new computer with Vista. It's the integration with my extant programs that concern me. I can appreciate that, Tony, but so far I haven't found any modern software (say from year 2000 onwards, intended for Windows 2000 or XP) which won't run. I understand that 16-bit software won't work (but perhaps it might under a virtual machine), but the only 16-bit software I still have is from 1999 and would not be transferred to a new PC in any case as it runs on its own dedicated machine. I have seen some software which has a 16-bit installer, but even that software worked if the files were simply copied from another PC. A note to the author quickly resulted in a 32-bit installer version! I do hear that some hardware manufacturers have been rather late in producing drivers for their hardware, and I may be about to encounter that problem myself with a new PC install for someone else shortly. Cheers, David |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
More fun with the Leica M8
michael adams wrote:
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... : Too bad, the M6 and prior Leica's were favoured by combat correspondents : and photogs for their reliability, simplicity, compactness not to : mention image quality. Indeed. All Leica were trying to do was try and maintain the qualities for which they've always been renowed, in the face of the totally different demands being made on the familiar body shape by digital reproduction. It's not particularly edyifying to watch people jumpimg up and down in glee over their failure, in what's turned out to be a difficult if not impossible task. Don't count me as 'gleeful'. It's always a benefit to the industry to have companies dedicated to excellence. (OTOH: it is a bucket of cooling water for those blinded by faith). Leica, from the linked report, did not do enough design engineering, user consultation and user testing before release. They were under very high pressure to get their camera into the market as film camera sales were all but dead. Leica, although posting rare earnings in the last two years after 5 or more of losses (and forecasting a loss this year and 'maybe' break even next year) made the error of rushing the M8 to market before it was really ready for photographers. Yes it cost far too much, yes it turned out to be a pile of crap, yes Leica were the Nazis camera of choice, but it was a noble enterprise neverthless IMO. Americans, Brits and many others (military and other agencies) did not throw out their extensive inventory of Zeiss and Leica (and other) equipment in the war; but used same to good measure (Likewise Browning in Utah used to send the "HP" pistol to Germany complete to engraved eagle and swastika before the war...) -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
More fun with the Leica M8
"tony cooper" wrote in message ... On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:54:15 GMT, "David J Taylor" wrote: Bõwser wrote: "Allen" wrote in message [] It makes one wonder if the people who created Windows Vista have bought Leitz. Allen And here's the worst part: I have Vista 64 loaded on three machines, none of them have ever failed. All run perfectly. Strange that - I had just the same experience with Vista 32 here. Must be something in the mains! The most common complaint I hear/see about Vista is not about the stability of the OS, but about compatibility of older programs with this OS. Many of us have older ("older" in the computer sense of being purchased one year or more ago) programs that we don't want to upgrade to fit a new OS. True that... Where I work, we have two enterprise apps that need to be updated, which means pushing a new app or two out to 80,000 seats. But the IT Security folks want to make the move to Vista sooner, not later, so away we go... If I was concerned only with the stability/functional aspects of an OS, I'd have no problem buying a new computer with Vista. It's the integration with my extant programs that concern me. -- Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
More fun with the Leica M8
"Alan Browne" wrote in message ... michael adams wrote: "Alan Browne" wrote in message ... : Too bad, the M6 and prior Leica's were favoured by combat correspondents : and photogs for their reliability, simplicity, compactness not to : mention image quality. Indeed. All Leica were trying to do was try and maintain the qualities for which they've always been renowed, in the face of the totally different demands being made on the familiar body shape by digital reproduction. It's not particularly edyifying to watch people jumpimg up and down in glee over their failure, in what's turned out to be a difficult if not impossible task. Don't count me as 'gleeful'. It's always a benefit to the industry to have companies dedicated to excellence. (OTOH: it is a bucket of cooling water for those blinded by faith). Leica, from the linked report, did not do enough design engineering, user consultation and user testing before release. They were under very high pressure to get their camera into the market as film camera sales were all but dead. Leica, although posting rare earnings in the last two years after 5 or more of losses (and forecasting a loss this year and 'maybe' break even next year) made the error of rushing the M8 to market before it was really ready for photographers. Yes it cost far too much, yes it turned out to be a pile of crap, yes Leica were the Nazis camera of choice, but it was a noble enterprise neverthless IMO. Americans, Brits and many others (military and other agencies) did not throw out their extensive inventory of Zeiss and Leica (and other) equipment in the war; but used same to good measure (Likewise Browning in Utah used to send the "HP" pistol to Germany complete to engraved eagle and swastika before the war...) I was possibly a bit over-hasty there. While Leicas with Eagles and Swastikas are well known, and prized as collectors' items, apparently some members of the Leitz family were instrumental (no pun intended) in helping Jews escape their otherwise inevitable fate. Although there were rumours that it was at Eishenhower's request as a pre-war Leica owner, that the factories be spared in bombing raids, in fact they were already earmarked as being useful in helping in post-war German reconstruction. I discoverd all this 5 minutes after making the rather glib Nazi remark. They also like Becks beer in the U-Boats as confirmed by many photographs - Leica presumably in "U-Boot Krieg". It would have been nice to think that that classic shape of rangefinder camera could have survived into the digital age, nevertheless. michael adams .... -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
More fun with the Leica M8
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:51:11 -0400, Böwser wrote:
OK, I think it's time to nominate the Leica M8 as "Turkey of the Decade." http://photo.net/leica-rangefinders-forum/00QTrU Aparently, if you mount this thing on a tripod and shoot vertically, it falls apart. Yes, really. My sympathies to any of you who shelled out $5K for this trash. From: http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-...tml#post632457 I inserted some missing currency conversions. =============================== "Quoted today repair estimate... Well, I got the reply from Leica about my camera with broken bottom plate. Talked to the importer today, and they quoted Leica HQ's repair estimate at NOK 6,726 plus VAT = NOK 8,407.50 ( equivalent to USD 1,553.11) Quite a bill... Includes labour NOK 5,636 (USD $1,041.40), material NOK 840 (USD $155.21), shipping NOK 250 (USD $46.17) plus VAT (25%). Comments were "Impact damage. A piece of the camera housing is broken off." Also got the same on the snail mail today. I knew it would be frustrating when the 'repair charge' would be quoted, since the 'impact damage' all happened while the camera was swiveling on the tripod, and I consider this to be of normal use. The camera was never dropped so the body shell is scratch free. My Norwegian importer says this was 'the first such case' they have seen. Well, I tried to be as impartial as possible on my reporting to the forum of what happened. So there. Think need to cool off my head. oslo terry" =========================== Total cost for the body alone is now well in excess of $6,500, and it still takes crappy photos worse than any $100 P&S camera. That's true for 100% of all M8s, the cracking body only happens to some, so far. After that repair cost it still has the body defect that will crack again if you put it on a tripod in portrait orientation, which Leica conveniently calls abnormal use / abuse of the camera. Four forum participants have so far reported the same problem (a fraction of a percent of all M8 owners), and also reported to Leica who claim they've never heard of this happening before. 7,080 hits if you do a Google search with: leica m8 (baseplate OR base-plate OR latch OR shell OR cover) (cracked OR broken OR failure) This is the sign of a company trying to undermine itself and call it quits. The CEOs must be transferring funds into something more lucrative today, like their pockets. Anyone getting their M8 repaired only brings to mind that saying about a fool throwing their good money after bad. A repaired cracked body isn't going to fix those useless images that it creates. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses? | TJ[_2_] | Digital Photography | 13 | December 23rd 07 10:46 PM |
What is best (non-Leica) digital slr back for Leica R lenses? | TJ[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 12 | December 23rd 07 10:46 PM |
Is Lumix Leica real Leica? | John Navas[_2_] | Digital Photography | 1 | November 18th 07 09:16 AM |
Ebay for x-mas, Leica M2, Lecia R3, five leica lenses | Eddie | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | December 14th 05 05:25 AM |
FS: Leica Adapter to Use Nikkor SLR Lenses on your M Series Leica | Don Whipple | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | September 24th 03 04:05 AM |