|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
July 23rd 08, 04:40 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?
Rich wrote:
Sick of the idiocy of the ultrazoom, itty-bitty sensored junk that they sell as P&S's today? Maybe this one will be different. An f2 lens! Shades of 2001 and the Olympus C-3040!! A conservative zoom range and a larger sensor. http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08...clx3.asp#specs It has no viewfinder. Russell 
|
|
#2
July 23rd 08, 05:51 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?
Russell D. wrote:
Rich wrote: Sick of the idiocy of the ultrazoom, itty-bitty sensored junk that they sell as P&S's today? Maybe this one will be different. An f2 lens! Shades of 2001 and the Olympus C-3040!! A conservative zoom range and a larger sensor. http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08...clx3.asp#specs It has no viewfinder. Scroll down for the optional rangefinder attachment.
|
|
#3
July 23rd 08, 06:14 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?
Matt Ion wrote in news:g66d1n$3ug$2
@registered.motzarella.org: Put a 0.3mm focal length on it, and you don't need a viewfinder - just point it in the general direction of your subject, and crop it later  Now your sensor is *really* small. -- John P Sheehy
|
|
#4
July 23rd 08, 08:37 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?
Russell D. wrote:
Rich wrote: Sick of the idiocy of the ultrazoom, itty-bitty sensored junk that they sell as P&S's today? Maybe this one will be different. An f2 lens! Shades of 2001 and the Olympus C-3040!! A conservative zoom range and a larger sensor. http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08...clx3.asp#specs It has no viewfinder. Russell That and the 2.5X optical zoom would disqualify it for me.
|
|
#5
July 23rd 08, 11:32 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?
On 2008-07-23, Paul Furman wrote:
Russell D. wrote: Rich wrote: Sick of the idiocy of the ultrazoom, itty-bitty sensored junk that they sell as P&S's today? Maybe this one will be different. An f2 lens! Shades of 2001 and the Olympus C-3040!! A conservative zoom range and a larger sensor. http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08...clx3.asp#specs It has no viewfinder. Scroll down for the optional rangefinder attachment. Without coming over all Harrington, it's a viewfinder. It is quite an interesting camera for what it is. -- savvo orig. invib. man
|
|
#6
July 23rd 08, 01:15 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?
Shawn Hirn wrote:
[] Yup. No viewfinder is a deal breaker for me. [] Shawn, It has an optical viewfinder, but it is an add-on purchase. It has quite large sensor for a compact zoom camera. David
|
|
#7
July 23rd 08, 10:23 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:15:18 GMT, David J Taylor wrote:
Shawn Hirn wrote: [] Yup. No viewfinder is a deal breaker for me. [] Shawn, It has an optical viewfinder, but it is an add-on purchase. It has quite large sensor for a compact zoom camera. David Is the add-on viewfinder coupled to the camera's electronics? -- --- 7/23/2008 2:23:21 PM
|
|
#8
July 24th 08, 12:54 PM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|||
|
|||
|
First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?
"Russell D." wrote in message ... Rich wrote: Sick of the idiocy of the ultrazoom, itty-bitty sensored junk that they sell as P&S's today? Maybe this one will be different. An f2 lens! Shades of 2001 and the Olympus C-3040!! A conservative zoom range and a larger sensor. http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08...clx3.asp#specs It has no viewfinder. That was my first thought too. All that money and no optical viewfinder. So it's a nifty camera that you can't use in bright sunlight. Great. Neil
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap? | /dev/null/ | Digital Photography | 1 | July 23rd 08 12:56 PM |
| Finally a P&S that isn't a piece of crap? | Rich | Digital Photography | 34 | March 16th 08 09:02 PM |
| Album 26 Special "January 2008-3" "Lumières d'Opale" | Lumières d'Opale | Digital Photography | 0 | February 7th 08 12:30 PM |
| How to insert the "modified time" attribute in "date taken" attrib in batch mode | ashjas | Digital Photography | 4 | November 8th 06 09:00 PM |
Linear Mode
