If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot that drone down - last nail
On 2016-06-02 19:54, nospam wrote:
In article , Alan Browne wrote: There is 0 conjecture. Prove otherwise. This isn't an argument that can have any productive end, and I'm not going to on about it, but you need to step back, objectively reread your posts, and then decide if you can reasonably claim *zero* conjecture. I personally see nearly 100%. Some yes. But the physical reality of the system he claims to have cannot work in the differential mode he claims w/o a transponder and encoder near by. Even if he had such, it likely would not work as there would be no radar pulses received (from ATC) to trigger it to reply. completely wrong. Dingbat, I've already conceded that the device you claim to have does what you say. I wrote the above before seeing your other message. Really, you are the master of over-write. -- She hummed to herself because she was an unrivaled botcher of lyrics. -Nick (Gone Girl), Gillian Flynn. |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot that drone down - last nail
On 2016-06-02 19:54, nospam wrote:
In article , Alan Browne wrote: i don't have an atd-300. i never said i had an atd-300. go read the specs of the two units i said i *do* have, and if you'd been paying *any* attention, you'd know which ones they are, as it's been mentioned several times. i'm intentionally not saying it again. Okay then, you're on the path to victory here, and I'll admit that - once I see your video of it working with proof that it's your unit. So make the video, get a "catch". Move that camera around. Say something specific and clearly linked to this group. Don't do anything to the video. i'm not on any 'path to victory' nor is this some sort of game i'm trying to 'win'. what i wrote is absolutely correct. end of story. i don't give a **** if you believe it or not. i own what i said i own, the specs are as i said they are and they work the way i said they do. Prove it. See below. Your soft photo (from such a photo expert) doesn't cut it at all. if you actually *used* one rather than *guess* how they work (getting almost all of it wrong), you'd see that *everything* i've said is correct. As I say above, you're right about the spec of the device you *claim* to have used. Let's see the video proof that you have one and not some poor quality photo that's been "colour corrected". Post a full resolution, uncorrected video of the device in operation and showing one aircraft's altitude (relative or otherwise). Voice it over with "Alan Browne is a complete ****ing idiot and knows nothing about these devices!" or whatever gets your fancy. Include the piece of paper from the other day. -- She hummed to herself because she was an unrivaled botcher of lyrics. -Nick (Gone Girl), Gillian Flynn. |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot that drone down - last nail
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 09:36:37 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote: On 2016-06-02 19:54, nospam wrote: In article , Alan Browne wrote: There is 0 conjecture. Prove otherwise. This isn't an argument that can have any productive end, and I'm not going to on about it, but you need to step back, objectively reread your posts, and then decide if you can reasonably claim *zero* conjecture. I personally see nearly 100%. Some yes. But the physical reality of the system he claims to have cannot work in the differential mode he claims w/o a transponder and encoder near by. Even if he had such, it likely would not work as there would be no radar pulses received (from ATC) to trigger it to reply. completely wrong. Dingbat, I've already conceded that the device you claim to have does what you say. I wrote the above before seeing your other message. Really, you are the master of over-write. I've never seen anyone accuse nospam of that before! -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot that drone down - last nail
In article , Alan Browne
wrote: There is 0 conjecture. Prove otherwise. This isn't an argument that can have any productive end, and I'm not going to on about it, but you need to step back, objectively reread your posts, and then decide if you can reasonably claim *zero* conjecture. I personally see nearly 100%. Some yes. But the physical reality of the system he claims to have cannot work in the differential mode he claims w/o a transponder and encoder near by. Even if he had such, it likely would not work as there would be no radar pulses received (from ATC) to trigger it to reply. completely wrong. Dingbat, I've already conceded that the device you claim to have does what you say. I wrote the above before seeing your other message. Really, you are the master of over-write. you know now, but when i wrote that you didn't. at least you concede that i was right all along. |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot that drone down - last nail
On 2016-06-05 15:46, nospam wrote:
In article , Alan Browne wrote: There is 0 conjecture. Prove otherwise. This isn't an argument that can have any productive end, and I'm not going to on about it, but you need to step back, objectively reread your posts, and then decide if you can reasonably claim *zero* conjecture. I personally see nearly 100%. Some yes. But the physical reality of the system he claims to have cannot work in the differential mode he claims w/o a transponder and encoder near by. Even if he had such, it likely would not work as there would be no radar pulses received (from ATC) to trigger it to reply. completely wrong. Dingbat, I've already conceded that the device you claim to have does what you say. I wrote the above before seeing your other message. Really, you are the master of over-write. you know now, but when i wrote that you didn't. at least you concede that i was right all along. About such devices, sure. Still waiting on the proof (video of yours working) that you actually have one as claimed. Your "fuzzy" photo (from a photographer) that was "colour corrected (how convenient) at far less than resolution than an ordinary iPhone is very unconvincing. -- She hummed to herself because she was an unrivaled botcher of lyrics. -Nick (Gone Girl), Gillian Flynn. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Shoot that drone down - last nail
On 6/10/2016 3:59 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2016-06-05 15:46, nospam wrote: In article , Alan Browne wrote: There is 0 conjecture. Prove otherwise. This isn't an argument that can have any productive end, and I'm not going to on about it, but you need to step back, objectively reread your posts, and then decide if you can reasonably claim *zero* conjecture. I personally see nearly 100%. Some yes. But the physical reality of the system he claims to have cannot work in the differential mode he claims w/o a transponder and encoder near by. Even if he had such, it likely would not work as there would be no radar pulses received (from ATC) to trigger it to reply. completely wrong. Dingbat, I've already conceded that the device you claim to have does what you say. I wrote the above before seeing your other message. Really, you are the master of over-write. you know now, but when i wrote that you didn't. at least you concede that i was right all along. About such devices, sure. Still waiting on the proof (video of yours working) that you actually have one as claimed. Your "fuzzy" photo (from a photographer) that was "colour corrected (how convenient) at far less than resolution than an ordinary iPhone is very unconvincing. You will have a long wait. -- PeterN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Shoot that drone down | newshound | Digital Photography | 0 | May 28th 16 12:40 PM |
One of the hazards of drone-photography. | Eric Stevens | Digital Photography | 3 | October 28th 15 08:27 PM |
More drone issues | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 7 | July 1st 14 05:48 PM |
The 1st FAA Prosecution of a Civilian Drone UAV | Eric Stevens | Digital Photography | 8 | November 2nd 13 11:27 PM |
Drone helicopter with 1.8G camera | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 1 | December 30th 11 03:14 PM |