Canon EOS 1Ds MkII Preview

"Brian C. Baird" wrote:

In article , says...
And where are these images? I tried to find them. For example http://www.luminous-landscape.com/new/ just wrote "Canon has *not
provided* review samples yet, but I expect to have one for field
testing shortly..."

They're on the Canon Japan website. dPreview.com has a link under their
1Ds Mk II preview.

I must be doing something wrong... I just went again
through all 4 pages of dpreview preview, I can not
find it :-(

Stop: all back, there it is:

DATE 21/Sep/04, 0730 GMT: Sample images
Canon has just posted a small gallery of four sample images (click here)
http://www.canon.co.jp/Imaging/eos1d..._sample-e.html

Thomas

--
http://www.pbase.com/bcbaird/

"Brian C. Baird" wrote in message
.. .
In article , ternet
says...
Woohoo. More pixels. Whatever did we do before now.

Have you even looked at the sample images?

Yup. Boring as hell.

Couple hundred extra horizontal/vertical pixels doesn't help that in the
slightest.

--
Martin Francis http://www.sixbysix.co.uk
"Go not to Usenet for counsel, for it will say both no, and yes, and
no, and yes...."

"Brian C. Baird" wrote in message
.. .
In article , ternet
says...
Woohoo. More pixels. Whatever did we do before now.

Have you even looked at the sample images?

Yup. Boring as hell.

Couple hundred extra horizontal/vertical pixels doesn't help that in the
slightest.

--
Martin Francis http://www.sixbysix.co.uk
"Go not to Usenet for counsel, for it will say both no, and yes, and
no, and yes...."

Martin Francis wrote:
Woohoo. More pixels. Whatever did we do before now.

Grump about there not being enough pixels.

--
-- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource:
-- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--

Martin Francis wrote:
Woohoo. More pixels. Whatever did we do before now.

Grump about there not being enough pixels.

--
-- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource:
-- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--

Martin Francis wrote:
Woohoo. More pixels. Whatever did we do before now.

Grump about there not being enough pixels.

--
-- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource:
-- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--

ThomasH wrote:

TP wrote:

Deryck Lant wrote:


http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos1dsmkii/

Obviously the excitement created by Nikon had to be diverted a little before
Photokina.

At last, a DSLR to rival 35mm film for most applications - and I say
that having carefully studied all four of Canon's sample images.


And where are these images? I tried to find them. For example http://www.luminous-landscape.com/new/ just wrote "Canon has *not
provided* review samples yet, but I expect to have one for field
testing shortly..."

Screw luminous-landscapes ... go to the source:

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos1dsmkii/ which leads to:

http://www.canon.co.jp/Imaging/eos1d..._sample-e.html

Cheers,
Alan


--
-- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource:
-- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--

ThomasH wrote:

TP wrote:

Deryck Lant wrote:


http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos1dsmkii/

Obviously the excitement created by Nikon had to be diverted a little before
Photokina.

At last, a DSLR to rival 35mm film for most applications - and I say
that having carefully studied all four of Canon's sample images.


And where are these images? I tried to find them. For example http://www.luminous-landscape.com/new/ just wrote "Canon has *not
provided* review samples yet, but I expect to have one for field
testing shortly..."

Screw luminous-landscapes ... go to the source:

http://www.dpreview.com/articles/canoneos1dsmkii/ which leads to:

http://www.canon.co.jp/Imaging/eos1d..._sample-e.html

Cheers,
Alan


--
-- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource:
-- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--

"Dallas" posted:
"...
My lab has started charging extra for having to convert TIFF
files to JPEG
so that they can print them on the Frontier.
...."

That's strange ... several web sites for independent
professional labs, and Fuji's own web site, say that the
Frontier likes 300 dpi TIFF files ... and *ONLY* 300 dpi
TIFF files.

Are you sure that "your lab" hasn't just found a way to
charge you more-and-more $$$ ?

"Dallas" posted:
"...
My lab has started charging extra for having to convert TIFF
files to JPEG
so that they can print them on the Frontier.
...."

That's strange ... several web sites for independent
professional labs, and Fuji's own web site, say that the
Frontier likes 300 dpi TIFF files ... and *ONLY* 300 dpi
TIFF files.

Are you sure that "your lab" hasn't just found a way to
charge you more-and-more $$$ ?