If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
So, Why FF ?
Seems to me that FF is all about connectng back to the old 35 mm film
format, and very little else, since smaller sensors with the same pixcel count in conjunction with shorter lenses could do the same thing, BUT smaller and lighter. What part have I got wrong ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
So, Why FF ?
In article ,
wrote: Seems to me that FF is all about connectng back to the old 35 mm film format, and very little else, since smaller sensors with the same pixcel count in conjunction with shorter lenses could do the same thing, BUT smaller and lighter. What part have I got wrong ? just about everything. full frame sensors produce images with higher image quality, lower noise, wider dynamic range and/or higher resolution, and the lenses aren't necessarily bigger. so no, a crop sensor can't 'do the same thing'. some people might not notice or care, but that's something else entirely. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
So, Why FF ?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
So, Why FF ?
just about everything. full frame sensors produce images with higher image quality But why ? lower noise That might be, but why ? wider dynamic range and/or higher resolution If the pixcel numbers are the same and the aspect ratios are the same, then the resolutions are equal. My question assumes shorter lenses to yield the same image. Nothing cropped. and the lenses aren't necessarily bigger. Not true, under the above premise. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
So, Why FF ?
Good info, thanks.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
So, Why FF ?
In article ,
wrote: just about everything. full frame sensors produce images with higher image quality But why ? physics. lower noise That might be, but why ? it is, and again, physics. bigger sensors collect more light, thus lower noise. wider dynamic range and/or higher resolution If the pixcel numbers are the same and the aspect ratios are the same, then the resolutions are equal. for the same number of pixels, a larger sensor will have larger individual pixels, resulting in lower noise and higher image quality. if the pixels are the same size on both sensors, then a larger sensor will have more pixels. either way, full frame wins. My question assumes shorter lenses to yield the same image. Nothing cropped. and the lenses aren't necessarily bigger. Not true, under the above premise. there are many variables, most of which people ignore. for the same image quality, a micro 4/3rds sensor lens must be two stops faster than its full frame counterpart, making it bigger and more expensive, and in some cases, physically impossible. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
So, Why FF ?
In article ,
RichA wrote: FF does produce slightly better images than APS, more than slightly. ff is 1 stop better than aps, aotbe. it also typically gets the latest sensor technologies first. mostly it shows where noise might be an issue. But it's a much bigger commitment in-terms of lens cost, not necessarily. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
So, Why FF ?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
So, Why FF ?
In article , Neil
wrote: Seems to me that FF is all about connectng back to the old 35 mm film format, and very little else, since smaller sensors with the same pixcel count in conjunction with shorter lenses could do the same thing, BUT smaller and lighter. What part have I got wrong ? I think it's connecting back to the 35mm lenses that people have and like that part is true. but are compromised when used with smaller sensors. that part is not. there is no compromise in using a full frame lens on a smaller sensor. it's actually *better*. Although the larger sensor cell area has a better signal to noise ratio, most prints won't expose those differences if the pixel counts are the same. some do, and prints aren't the only output medium. hdr displays come to mind. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
So, Why FF ?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|