If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Funky IR Artefact
In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote: Mirrorless cameras have the ability to AF IR light without focusing issues found in DSLRs. Typically with IR converted DSLRs camera/lens combos have to be calibrated, not so with mirrorless. That is ONLY true if ONLY IR light is falling on the sensor. it's true no matter what light type of light is. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Funky IR Artefact
On Apr 27, 2018, Whisky-dave wrote
(in ): On Friday, 27 April 2018 15:23:32 UTC+1, Savageduck wrote: On Apr 27, 2018, Whisky-dave wrote (in ): Gone right over yuor head hasn;t it, why do they but IR markings on lenes and this gose back well before mirrorless are yuo really climing that IR light focussess differntly for mirrorless cameras ? Yes. So you're saying that all light focuses at the same point through a lens irrespective of it's wavelengh ? Amazing isn’t it. What we are saying is DSLRs and mirrorless cameras go about focusing for full spectrum light, including IR very differently. Mirrorless cameras have the ability to AF IR light without focusing issues found in DSLRs. Typically with IR converted DSLRs camera/lens combos have to be calibrated, not so with mirrorless. That is ONLY true if ONLY IR light is falling on the sensor. Strangely enough with mirrorless cameras all light, including IR, passing through the lens falls on the sensor. With mirrorless cameras AF happens via the sensor, and you get a realtime preview of the image before capture in either the EVF and on LCD. SO tell me why andriods IR picture is so OOF . Beats me! You would have to check with android on that. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/...22%2311638.jpg I still DO NOT believe this is an IR image. It is an image captured with an IR filter on the lens he used. Here is one photographer's experience. https://neilvn.com/tangents/mirrorle...d-photography/ So to Lifepixel.com (the premier IR conversion service) all micro four thirds lenses will focus perfectly with infrared light, and that has been my experience as well. They actually recommend mirco four thirds cameras as the best choice for infrared Actually they say that mirrorless cameras, M4/3, APS-C, or FF will be a better choice for IR than a DSLR, and they reccommend a full spectrum conversion to use together with appropriate filters. so what's special about mirco four thirds ? Nothing. then there's this "Note that most IR conversion services will require a lens to calibrate the focus." That is in reference to DSLRs. However, in some cases such as with the Nikon D70 + old Nikkor 18-70mm it is not necessary due to dumb luck. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Funky IR Artefact
On 2018-04-27 14:54:49 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
SO tell me why andriods IR picture is so OOF . It was that file in a series that contained that special artefact. I was testing settings and focus was a non issue. We have now established that the artefact was photonic lemmings so lets move on... -- teleportation kills |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Funky IR Artefact
On 2018-04-27 14:54:49 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
SO tell me why andriods IR picture is so OOF . It was that file in a series that contained that special artefact. I was testing exposure settings and focus was a non issue. We have now established that the artefact was photonic lemmings so lets move on... -- teleportation kills |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Funky IR Artefact
On Apr 27, 2018, Whisky-dave wrote
(in ): On Friday, 27 April 2018 15:57:36 UTC+1, nospam wrote: In , Whisky-dave wrote: Mirrorless cameras have the ability to AF IR light without focusing issues found in DSLRs. Typically with IR converted DSLRs camera/lens combos have to be calibrated, not so with mirrorless. That is ONLY true if ONLY IR light is falling on the sensor. it's true no matter what light type of light is. IR is NOT falling on his sensor because he has a filter over it ! The filter he is using excludes all light other than IR. So IR is hitting his sensor. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Funky IR Artefact
In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote: Focusing with a mirrorless Cameras don't use the mirrors to focus the image, slrs have a secondary mirror behind the main mirror for the autofocus system to work, which has its own sensor. mirrorless focus using the main sensor. Really, when I focus my M3 I use the focusing ring on the lens for manual focus. whooooooosh. Gone right over yuor head hasn;t it, why do they but IR markings on lenes and this gose back well before mirrorless are yuo really climing that IR light focussess differntly for mirrorless cameras ? whoooooosh even higher. plus, modern lenses don't have ir markers anymore. So WTF has that got to do with it. IR works in the same way it has done since the big bang whether or not lenes have a mark on them is irrelivant. what you fail to understand is that a mirrorless camera focuses off the actual sensor, while slr has a *separate* focus module. what you have failed to notice is that he still hads the IR filter over the sensor so there is very little IR getting to the sensor to focus on. The sensor will focus on whatever light is shown on it, but NOT if teh IR filter filers out the IR then the lens won;t focus on the IR. whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Funky IR Artefact
On 2018-04-27 16:00:51 +0000, Savageduck said:
On Apr 27, 2018, Whisky-dave wrote (in ): On Friday, 27 April 2018 15:57:36 UTC+1, nospam wrote: In , Whisky-dave wrote: Mirrorless cameras have the ability to AF IR light without focusing issues found in DSLRs. Typically with IR converted DSLRs camera/lens combos have to be calibrated, not so with mirrorless. That is ONLY true if ONLY IR light is falling on the sensor. it's true no matter what light type of light is. IR is NOT falling on his sensor because he has a filter over it ! The filter he is using excludes all light other than IR. So IR is hitting his sensor. A QND from the archives: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/pccrx8oy5yelhac/i150626%236264.png -- teleportation kills |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Funky IR Artefact
On Apr 27, 2018, Whisky-dave wrote
(in ): On Friday, 27 April 2018 16:27:29 UTC+1, Savageduck wrote: Snip or dumb users or those that don;t care. would you say IR focussing matters on a lens of focal lenght 22mmm on a APSC sensor I wouldn't worry until I was apporaching 100mm then someone that knew what they wwre doing might notice. Sigh... To illustrate my point, here is a shot taken a few minutes ago with my X-T2 + XF35mm f/1.4 and a Hoya Infrared [R72] filter. ISO200, 1.9sec @ f/5.8. No calibration involved, scene was visible (though very red) in EVF and on LCD, focusing was not a problem. Processed quite quickly in LR Classic CC. https://www.dropbox.com/s/nb80vab1s6ptbqx/screenshot_301.png -- Regards, Savageduck |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Funky IR Artefact
On Apr 27, 2018, Savageduck wrote
(in iganews.com): On Apr 27, 2018, Whisky-dave wrote (in ): On Friday, 27 April 2018 16:27:29 UTC+1, Savageduck wrote: Snip or dumb users or those that don;t care. would you say IR focussing matters on a lens of focal lenght 22mmm on a APSC sensor I wouldn't worry until I was apporaching 100mm then someone that knew what they wwre doing might notice. Sigh... To illustrate my point, here is a shot taken a few minutes ago with my X-T2 + XF35mm f/1.4 and a Hoya Infrared [R72] filter. ISO200, 1.9sec @ f/5.8. No calibration involved, scene was visible (though very red) in EVF and on LCD, focusing was not a problem. Processed quite quickly in LR Classic CC. https://www.dropbox.com/s/nb80vab1s6ptbqx/screenshot_301.png Here is the shot without the comparison: https://www.dropbox.com/s/0ravrkd3sg9mcsp/_DSF6260.jpg -- Regards, Savageduck |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Funky IR Artefact
On 2018-04-27 23:05:30 +0000, Savageduck said:
On Apr 27, 2018, Savageduck wrote (in iganews.com): On Apr 27, 2018, Whisky-dave wrote (in ): On Friday, 27 April 2018 16:27:29 UTC+1, Savageduck wrote: Snip or dumb users or those that don;t care. would you say IR focussing matters on a lens of focal lenght 22mmm on a APSC sensor I wouldn't worry until I was apporaching 100mm then someone that knew what they wwre doing might notice. Sigh... To illustrate my point, here is a shot taken a few minutes ago with my X-T2 + XF35mm f/1.4 and a Hoya Infrared [R72] filter. ISO200, 1.9sec @ f/5.8. No calibration involved, scene was visible (though very red) in EVF and on LCD, focusing was not a problem. Processed quite quickly in LR Classic CC. https://www.dropbox.com/s/nb80vab1s6ptbqx/screenshot_301.png Here is the shot without the comparison: https://www.dropbox.com/s/0ravrkd3sg9mcsp/_DSF6260.jpg Youpp. The tell tale chlorophylian highlights are there. Good job! Now if you could bother with straighten up the horizon a tad. To be frank: It looks like the shoot was taken during one of your world famous earth shakes... -- teleportation kills |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon Coolpix L3 funky snapshot delay | John Doe | Digital Photography | 1 | January 8th 09 07:20 PM |
Tested lens, got funky stripes in sky... | baker1 | Digital Photography | 11 | February 5th 06 05:54 AM |
FS Olympus digital camera, printer NIB plus funky old rangefinders! | Isaac Crawford | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 0 | October 17th 04 06:53 AM |