Britain moves even further towards control of all people, allactivities

On 5/22/2012 7:38 PM, MC wrote:
RichA wrote:


http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk...-update-friday

It is technically private property so the "owners" can dictate what
they like. It is the same with any privately owned properties,
shopping malls, restaurants, office blocks, other public transport
buildings. They can all make whatever rules they like with regards
photography and quite often do, whereever you may be in the world.
However, this does not mean these countries are moving towards further
"control" because it has always been the same and these
companies/property owners are just being idiots.

Many times there is good reason. Why did Kodak ban photography on it's
factory tours.



You sensationalise too much.


The poor soul s bored.


--
Peter

On 5/28/2012 8:05 AM, Grimly Curmudgeon wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2012 10:42:53 -0400, PeterN
wrote:

Many times there is good reason. Why did Kodak ban photography on it's
factory tours.

Yeah, because Glasgow Underground is such a hotbed of design
innovation and nothing short of a sheer patent factory - everybody
know that and the industrial spies would be all over it if they could.

facepalm

Honestly, I've not read a bigger load of sheer ****e on here for weeks
and that's saying something.


Please read my comment. "Many times" has a specific meaning.

--
Peter

On 5/28/2012 11:23 AM, Mxsmanic wrote:
PeterN writes:

Please read my comment. "Many times" has a specific meaning.

To which specific number does it correspond?

Troll question not worthy of answer.


--
Peter