A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

which digital to choose?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 12th 05, 11:07 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default which digital to choose?


sue crowder wrote:
Hi Everyone
I am in the process of replacing my beloved pentax SRL, that has

given me 25
years of faithful sevice with a digital camera, any thoughts on the

best
available?

Thanks
Sue



You're going to be very disppointed if you switch to digital.

  #2  
Old February 13th 05, 12:39 AM
piemanlarger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...



You're going to be very disppointed if you switch to digital.


Yes, disapointed you did not do it sooner, as was i.


Pieman


  #3  
Old February 13th 05, 01:09 AM
Dirty Harry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"piemanlarger" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...



You're going to be very disppointed if you switch to digital.


Yes, disapointed you did not do it sooner, as was i.


Pieman


No doubt, my photography has improved 100 fold since I got a digital...now I
want a second one, thinking of a 20D...currently have a 300d but want some
more speed....or just a bigger buffer really...

www.harryphotos.com


  #4  
Old February 13th 05, 01:28 AM
UC
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


piemanlarger wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...



You're going to be very disppointed if you switch to digital.


Yes, disapointed you did not do it sooner, as was i.


Pieman


No, I mean compared to film images, which are much, much, much
superior....

  #5  
Old February 13th 05, 01:32 AM
grol
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dirty Harry" wrote in message
news:jNxPd.371068$8l.141004@pd7tw1no...

"piemanlarger" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...



You're going to be very disppointed if you switch to digital.


Yes, disapointed you did not do it sooner, as was i.


Pieman


No doubt, my photography has improved 100 fold since I got a digital...now I
want a second one, thinking of a 20D...currently have a 300d but want some
more speed....or just a bigger buffer really...


Any Nikon dSLRs with ISO50 or ISO100 yet? Not sure what Canon's ISOs are at.
200ISO minimum seems silly.


  #6  
Old February 13th 05, 05:43 AM
Brian C. Baird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
says...

You're going to be very disppointed if you switch to digital.


I doubt they will be.

You will be if they switch. That I'm sure of.
--
http://www.pbase.com/bcbaird/
  #9  
Old February 13th 05, 08:33 AM
piemanlarger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Kohary" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:32:22 +1300, "grol"
wrote:

Any Nikon dSLRs with ISO50 or ISO100 yet? Not sure what Canon's ISOs are

at.
200ISO minimum seems silly.


Nikon, not that I'm aware of. Canon's minimum is 100 on the 300D and
20D.


I have a Minolta 7d which goes from ISO 100 -3200.

I have got superb quality 15x10 inch prints at ISO 800 on it, far better
than I would get with Film. I am loath to use any other ISO rating at the
mo!


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mike Kohary mike at kohary dot com http://www.kohary.com

Karma Photography: http://www.karmaphotography.com
Seahawks Historical Database: http://www.kohary.com/seahawks
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



  #10  
Old February 13th 05, 05:54 PM
Fitpix
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dirty Harry" wrote in message
news:jNxPd.371068$8l.141004@pd7tw1no...

"piemanlarger" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...



You're going to be very disppointed if you switch to digital.


Yes, disapointed you did not do it sooner, as was i.


Pieman


No doubt, my photography has improved 100 fold since I got a digital...now
I
want a second one, thinking of a 20D...currently have a 300d but want some
more speed....or just a bigger buffer really...

www.harryphotos.com



I also noticed a nice gain in contrast when I upgraded to the 20D from
10D.....fwiw


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How should I permanently store digital photographs? Bill Hilton Digital Photography 182 January 3rd 05 03:21 PM
NYT article - GPS tagging of digital photos Alan Browne Digital Photography 4 December 22nd 04 07:36 AM
Why digital is not photographic Tom Phillips In The Darkroom 35 October 16th 04 08:16 PM
Sad news for film-based photography Ronald Shu Medium Format Photography Equipment 199 October 6th 04 01:34 AM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.