If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Macro question and calculation
Do you know a equations on how to calculate magnicication with the focal
length and subject distance for macro and non-macro lenses (or a good softwar to do that)? I would like to know something. With a sigma 180mm macro, if my subject is at 0,46 m (the minimal working distance), the magnification will be 1:1. If the distance between my lense and the subject increase, the magnification will decrease. I would like to know how to calculate the distance between the subject and the lense to get a magnification of 1:2, 1:3, etc or at a give distance, which magnification will I have... I have the Canon EF 70-300 IS USM and if I remember, the maximum magnification is 0,25X at 1,5 m of working distance and 300mm of focal lenght. At which distance of the subect, the Canon EF 70-300 begin to have a higher magnification ?? At 1,5 meter, will I have a greater magnification with the Sigma 180 mm than with the Canon 70-300 ?? at 10 meters ?? Well... I suppose it is not simple ! I will be very glad if someone can help me ! Thank you very much for your time ! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Macro question and calculation
"Jonathan Sylvestre" wrote in message . .. Do you know a equations on how to calculate magnicication with the focal length and subject distance for macro and non-macro lenses (or a good softwar to do that)? I would like to know something. With a sigma 180mm macro, if my subject is at 0,46 m (the minimal working distance), the magnification will be 1:1. If the distance between my lense and the subject increase, the magnification will decrease. I would like to know how to calculate the distance between the subject and the lense to get a magnification of 1:2, 1:3, etc or at a give distance, which magnification will I have... I have the Canon EF 70-300 IS USM and if I remember, the maximum magnification is 0,25X at 1,5 m of working distance and 300mm of focal lenght. At which distance of the subect, the Canon EF 70-300 begin to have a higher magnification ?? At 1,5 meter, will I have a greater magnification with the Sigma 180 mm than with the Canon 70-300 ?? at 10 meters ?? Well... I suppose it is not simple ! I will be very glad if someone can help me ! Thank you very much for your time ! Here is a web site with a magnifaction calculator: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...lenseq.html#c1 However there is a problem with using a formula like this in that it is difficult to determine the object distance with real lenses. The formula used is the "thin lens" formula which assumes that the lens is infinetly thin, whereas in real life the lens is not. For long subject distances this can be neglected, but for closer up it is significant. Some prime (non-zoom)lenses have a mark on the lens barrel which indicates the "thin lens" equivalent. Also some lenses come with a table that shows magnification at various focus distances. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Macro question and calculation
Jonathan Sylvestre wrote: Do you know a equations on how to calculate magnicication with the focal length and subject distance for macro and non-macro lenses (or a good softwar to do that)? I would like to know something. With a sigma 180mm macro, if my subject is at 0,46 m (the minimal working distance), the magnification will be 1:1. If the distance between my lense and the subject increase, the magnification will decrease. I would like to know how to calculate the distance between the subject and the lense to get a magnification of 1:2, 1:3, etc or at a give distance, which magnification will I have... I have the Canon EF 70-300 IS USM and if I remember, the maximum magnification is 0,25X at 1,5 m of working distance and 300mm of focal lenght. At which distance of the subect, the Canon EF 70-300 begin to have a higher magnification ?? At 1,5 meter, will I have a greater magnification with the Sigma 180 mm than with the Canon 70-300 ?? at 10 meters ?? Well... I suppose it is not simple ! I will be very glad if someone can help me ! Thank you very much for your time ! In a "pure" lens formula the distace from the subject to the nodal point of the lens should be the same as the focal length of the lens. So this formula is dashed immedeately with the distance of .46m for a 180mm lens. You may just have to test this out, the lens does have magnification markings. The distance at 1:2 should be 2x of 1:1. But with macros for 35mm or dslrs manufacturers seem to have a sliding scale, or focal length changes as the lens expands. I know on my view camera at 1:1 my 120 macro lens is 120mm from the subject, and the distance to trhe film plane is 240mm, at 1:2 the distance to the subject is 240mm and the lens to film plane is 180mm. The lens at infinity is 120mm from lens to film plane. The constraints of making lenses for DSLRs makes these calculations difficult. Testing is the best way to handle it. Tom |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Macro question and calculation
Jonathan Sylvestre wrote:
Do you know a equations on how to calculate magnicication with the focal length and subject distance for macro and non-macro lenses (or a good softwar to do that)? I would like to know something. With a sigma 180mm macro, if my subject is at 0,46 m (the minimal working distance), the magnification will be 1:1. If the distance between my lense and the subject increase, the magnification will decrease. I would like to know how to calculate the distance between the subject and the lense to get a magnification of 1:2, 1:3, etc or at a give distance, which magnification will I have... I have the Canon EF 70-300 IS USM and if I remember, the maximum magnification is 0,25X at 1,5 m of working distance and 300mm of focal lenght. At which distance of the subect, the Canon EF 70-300 begin to have a higher magnification ?? At 1,5 meter, will I have a greater magnification with the Sigma 180 mm than with the Canon 70-300 ?? at 10 meters ?? Well... I suppose it is not simple ! I will be very glad if someone can help me ! Thank you very much for your time ! Try this web site it may help. http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Macro question and calculation
tomm42 wrote:
lenses for DSLRs makes these calculations difficult. Testing is the best way to handle it. Yes, photograph a ruler. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Macro question and calculation | Jonathan Sylvestre | Photographing Nature | 4 | May 13th 06 04:53 PM |