If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is 50 ISO even real?
Or is it just "cut the voltage" in order to allow slower shutter
speeds, wider lens openings, etc? Most cameras show no improvement going from 100 to 50 and a couple I've read about actually produce worse output at 50 than 100. So is 50 ISO simply an electronic "neutral density filter" in most cases?? -Rich |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is 50 ISO even real?
It was on my Olympus C8080 as well, but Nikon DSLRs started at 200 and
some cameras now don't go below 100 so I assumed that was the "base" sensitivity of those sensors and that 50 ISO was merely a reduction in signal of some kind and not a true sense "floor." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is 50 ISO even real?
Rich wrote:
Or is it just "cut the voltage" in order to allow slower shutter speeds, wider lens openings, etc? Most cameras show no improvement going from 100 to 50 and a couple I've read about actually produce worse output at 50 than 100. So is 50 ISO simply an electronic "neutral density filter" in most cases?? Way too complex a question to be asked seriously by a chap who posts only to create threads. If you really want to know, "Rich", you could Google this very newsgroup. It was covered ad nauseum within the last few months. -- John McWilliams |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is 50 ISO even real?
All sensitivities work like that.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is 50 ISO even real?
Rich wrote:
Or is it just "cut the voltage" in order to allow slower shutter speeds, wider lens openings, etc? Most cameras show no improvement going from 100 to 50 and a couple I've read about actually produce worse output at 50 than 100. So is 50 ISO simply an electronic "neutral density filter" in most cases?? -Rich It is real on the 1D Mark II, although not quite. At ISO 100 the sensor max is 53,300 electrons. So at ISO 50, one would expect 106,000 electrons, but the sensor saturates at 79,900 electrons. So really the lowest ISO is 67 (100 * 53300/80000). http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/evaluation-1d2 On smaller pixel cameras, which collect fewer photons, ISOs below 100 are reasonable. It all depends on the % active area, full well and quantum efficiency. The Nikon DSLRs with a CCD sensor appear to have a slightly higher quantum efficiency, thus the higher minimum ISO. I'm analyzing a D50 now and will have results soon. Roger |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is 50 ISO even real?
Isn't hindsight wonderful? Makes you feel really....superior.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is 50 ISO even real?
"Rich" wrote in message oups.com... Isn't hindsight wonderful? Makes you feel really....superior. Not difficult with you buster. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: ends 8 hrs - BIG Lot Old Real Photos Men Women ARMY Navy AIRFORCE + | AVP | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | November 23rd 05 06:22 PM |
Real World 5D with wide angle lens performance | Ray Fischer | Digital Photography | 0 | October 15th 05 06:56 AM |
First real weekend shooting Pentax DS digital body | Cheesehead | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | June 21st 05 02:37 PM |
Oxyride batteries - a real advance? | Steve | Digital Photography | 0 | April 9th 05 05:20 PM |
Looking for real neutral tone w/ fiber paper | Nicolas C. | In The Darkroom | 4 | February 28th 04 10:51 PM |