If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak to reduce work force by 20%
Today's papers report that Kodak is about to reduce its work force worldwide
by 20%. People just aren't buying film the way they used to... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak to reduce work force by 20%
In article ,
"Michael A. Covington" wrote: Today's papers report that Kodak is about to reduce its work force worldwide by 20%. People just aren't buying film the way they used to... Maybe, but I am sure the reason goes way beyond that. -- LF website http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak to reduce work force by 20%
Today's papers report that Kodak is about to reduce its work force worldwide by 20%. People just aren't buying film the way they used to... I think Kodak's problems have more to do with poor organization than with people abandoning film... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak to reduce work force by 20%
Today's papers report that Kodak is about to reduce its work force
worldwide by 20%. People just aren't buying film the way they used to... I think Kodak's problems have more to do with poor organization than with people abandoning film... Really? Film sales in the US were down 10% in 2002. When the 2003 results are in, I bet they show another 15% decline. They can't keep suffering declines like that, which will likely accelerate. Amateurs are flocking to digital in droves. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak to reduce work force by 20%
Today's papers report that Kodak is about to reduce its work force
worldwide by 20%. People just aren't buying film the way they used to... Maybe, but I am sure the reason goes way beyond that. -- Really? Film sales in the US were down 10% in 2002. When the 2003 results are in, I bet they show another 15% decline. They can't keep suffering declines like that, which will likely accelerate. Amateurs are flocking to digital in droves. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak to reduce work force by 20%
"Mark A" wrote in message ...
Today's papers report that Kodak is about to reduce its work force worldwide by 20%. People just aren't buying film the way they used to... I think Kodak's problems have more to do with poor organization than with people abandoning film... Really? Film sales in the US were down 10% in 2002. When the 2003 results are in, I bet they show another 15% decline. They can't keep suffering declines like that, which will likely accelerate. Amateurs are flocking to digital in droves. Kodak repoerted an 8% drop from last year. Of course, this is still more than it was in 1990! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak to reduce work force by 20%
I think Kodak's problems have more to do with poor organization than with people abandoning film... The precipitous decline in their major marketplace is issue #1, Kodak's poor management is right behind at #2. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak to reduce work force by 20%
In article ,
"Mark A" wrote: Today's papers report that Kodak is about to reduce its work force worldwide by 20%. People just aren't buying film the way they used to... Maybe, but I am sure the reason goes way beyond that. -- Really? Film sales in the US were down 10% in 2002. When the 2003 results are in, I bet they show another 15% decline. They can't keep suffering declines like that, which will likely accelerate. Amateurs are flocking to digital in droves. Really. Is that you pat answer for everything. -- LF website http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak to reduce work force by 20%
Today's papers report that Kodak is about to reduce its work force
worldwide by 20%. People just aren't buying film the way they used to... Maybe, but I am sure the reason goes way beyond that. -- Really? Film sales in the US were down 10% in 2002. When the 2003 results are in, I bet they show another 15% decline. They can't keep suffering declines like that, which will likely accelerate. Amateurs are flocking to digital in droves. Really. Is that you pat answer for everything. -- No, only when the two different people make the identical incorrect observation. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Kodak to reduce work force by 20%
In article ,
"Mark A" wrote: No, only when the two different people make the identical incorrect observation. And of course you are never wrong. -- LF website http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kodak CX6200 vs. Old NiMH batteries | Roger Stone | Digital Photography | 6 | June 28th 04 03:39 PM |
Add Kodak Brown to KRST? | Mike | In The Darkroom | 12 | May 5th 04 09:33 AM |
I'm guessing that Kodak will kill Kodachrome within the next 24 months | John Horner | Film & Labs | 17 | December 22nd 03 02:59 PM |
Kodak shifts focus (WSJ article) | David Foy | Film & Labs | 2 | October 1st 03 11:26 PM |