If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon to focus on digital
Scott Schuckert wrote:
In article , Mark Roberts wrote: Still (in the U.S. at least) nothing that you agree to in a contract is binding if it contravenes statute law. The same law professor told us about companies that make employees sign "non-compete agreements" that prohibit them from working competing business within six months or a year after leaving. Pennsylvania is a "right to work" state, which means these agreements are illegal. He always happily signed the contract and then had them it out of court when he left and the employer tried to enforce it. Since this is a state, not federal, law, he wouldn't have been able to do this everywhere in the U.S. i've had this exact experience, more than once, in Pennsylvania. In the computer business, they ALWAYS have some kind of draconian non-compete clause, and they always lose when they try to enforce it. I've been pretty sucessful in just ignoring them; though some associates of mine have spent big bucks getting them tossed out. "Right to Work" is Federal Law; Taft-Hartley Act of 1947. |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon to focus on digital
no_name wrote:
Scott Schuckert wrote: In article , Mark Roberts wrote: Still (in the U.S. at least) nothing that you agree to in a contract is binding if it contravenes statute law. The same law professor told us about companies that make employees sign "non-compete agreements" that prohibit them from working competing business within six months or a year after leaving. Pennsylvania is a "right to work" state, which means these agreements are illegal. He always happily signed the contract and then had them it out of court when he left and the employer tried to enforce it. Since this is a state, not federal, law, he wouldn't have been able to do this everywhere in the U.S. i've had this exact experience, more than once, in Pennsylvania. In the computer business, they ALWAYS have some kind of draconian non-compete clause, and they always lose when they try to enforce it. I've been pretty sucessful in just ignoring them; though some associates of mine have spent big bucks getting them tossed out. "Right to Work" is Federal Law; Taft-Hartley Act of 1947. Not really. "Right to Work" refers to whether a *state* allows a closed union shop or not. It is *enabled* by the Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, in that prior to that the pertinent Federal law was the National Labor Relations Act, which allows a company and a union to agree that membership in the union is a condition of employment. Taft-Hartley made that a function of state law rather than Federal law. The difference in practice is whether a union is a bargaining organization or a social club. In states with a "Right To Work" law unions are virtually a social entity with very little ability to actually negotiate wages for members. In particular if one looks at a list of the states with "Right To Work" laws, they are all at the bottom of the list for average hourly wages; however, it is unknown which is cause and which is affect. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Nikon to focus on digital
USA:
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/mi...E=Jan+11,+2006 "The measures that Nikon will adopt include discontinuing production of all large format Nikkor lenses and enlarging lenses, as well as several of our film camera bodies, manual focus Nikkor interchangeable lenses and related accessories. Sales of these products will cease as supplies are depleted. Importantly, Nikon's film camera business will continue with our flagship model F6(TM) and with the FM10(TM), allowing the Nikon brand to continue serving the two strongest segments of the 35mm film camera market. Both professionals and dedicated amateurs who continue to view film as their preferred format along with students in need of an economical camera to learn the fundamentals of photography will have ideal Nikon products from which to choose. Additionally, Nikon will continue to produce the manual focus 85mm f/2.8D PC Micro-Nikkor(R). With the interests of its customers in mind, Nikon will offer continued post-sale service for products whose production has ceased for a period of 10 (ten) years from Nikon Inc.'s last date of sale. This shift in business strategy and in the utilization of resources will allow Nikon to further its storied history and reputation as a leader in the ever-growing digital market and continue to offer groundbreaking new products and technology for photographers of all skill levels." Michael Benveniste wrote: http://www.nikon.co.uk/press_room/re...w.aspx?rid=201 -- So long, all film cameras except the F6 (and FM10). -- Fare thee well, Large Format Nikkors. -- Happy trails, 105mm f/2.5 and other classic manual focus Nikkors. -- Adios, El-Nikkors. Not terribly surprising, but still (IMO) a sad day. -- Michael Benveniste -- Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $419. Use this email address only to submit mail for evaluation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Nature's Best" contest and film vs digital | Bill Hilton | Photographing Nature | 15 | December 7th 05 11:03 PM |
"Nature's Best" contest and film vs digital | Bill Hilton | Digital Photography | 1 | November 28th 05 07:44 PM |
FS: 8 Nikon lenses including 80-200 Nikkor 2.8 zoom and accessories | Henry Peña | General Equipment For Sale | 2 | November 12th 03 02:56 PM |
FS: 8 Nikon lenses including 80-200 Nikkor 2.8 zoom and accessories | Henry Peña | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | November 11th 03 06:20 PM |
FS: 8 Nikon lenses including 80-200 Nikkor 2.8 zoom and accessories | Henry Peña | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | November 11th 03 06:20 PM |