If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
"Q.G. de Bakker" wrote:
Lassi Hippeläinen wrote: Twice the 35mm frame, but it seems that some people still believe even in 35mm: http://www.zeiss.de/C1256A770030BCE0...2F41D05AB4C125 6F1C002E544A?OpenDocument A new rangefinder system from Zeiss, and it is called Zeiss Ikon, not Contax! Not made by Kyocera? Cosina. Cosina already makes rangefinders. Zeiss only needs to make lenses. And they do so in Leica mount. ;-) An initeresting detail: "Long-time Carl Zeiss partner, Victor Hasselblad AB (Sweden), will take over worldwide (except Japan) distribution for the Zeiss Ikon camera system." "Except Japan"??? Why do the letters F, U, J, and I float in my mind? C. O. S. I. N. A. ? ;-) Some lenses will be made by the Voigtländer division of Cosina, though those same lenses will not be offered as Cosina, nor as Voigtländer. Anyone who has actually handled or used a modern Voigtländer lens should have absolutely no problem with the quality of construction. I do think it is a little funny that Zeiss once owned the Voigtländer name, got rid of it, and now is collaborating with a company licensing the name. Fuji Optical Industries is currently the anticipated distributor of the upcoming Zeiss Ikon system in Japan. The thought is that it would sell alongside the TX-1 and the Fuji version of the H1 Hasselblad. In other words, it would appear much like a Hasselblad display anywhere else in the world. Shriro is listed directly as the Zeiss Ikon distributor in many countries. It seems that Shriro is more behind the Zeiss Ikon and Hasselblad distribution idea, than some historical significance of past Hasselblad practices. Again, I think that can only enhance the appeal of all these camera systems. While I think this helps the Hasselblad brand recognition, I think it is a little sad that the V series is all that really remains of true Hasselblad cameras. The Xpan and H1 are Fuji products, though they are quite good systems. I really wonder if we will see anything new come out of Sweden. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
"Q.G. de Bakker" wrote:
Lassi Hippeläinen wrote: Twice the 35mm frame, but it seems that some people still believe even in 35mm: http://www.zeiss.de/C1256A770030BCE0...2F41D05AB4C125 6F1C002E544A?OpenDocument A new rangefinder system from Zeiss, and it is called Zeiss Ikon, not Contax! Not made by Kyocera? Cosina. Cosina already makes rangefinders. Zeiss only needs to make lenses. And they do so in Leica mount. ;-) An initeresting detail: "Long-time Carl Zeiss partner, Victor Hasselblad AB (Sweden), will take over worldwide (except Japan) distribution for the Zeiss Ikon camera system." "Except Japan"??? Why do the letters F, U, J, and I float in my mind? C. O. S. I. N. A. ? ;-) Some lenses will be made by the Voigtländer division of Cosina, though those same lenses will not be offered as Cosina, nor as Voigtländer. Anyone who has actually handled or used a modern Voigtländer lens should have absolutely no problem with the quality of construction. I do think it is a little funny that Zeiss once owned the Voigtländer name, got rid of it, and now is collaborating with a company licensing the name. Fuji Optical Industries is currently the anticipated distributor of the upcoming Zeiss Ikon system in Japan. The thought is that it would sell alongside the TX-1 and the Fuji version of the H1 Hasselblad. In other words, it would appear much like a Hasselblad display anywhere else in the world. Shriro is listed directly as the Zeiss Ikon distributor in many countries. It seems that Shriro is more behind the Zeiss Ikon and Hasselblad distribution idea, than some historical significance of past Hasselblad practices. Again, I think that can only enhance the appeal of all these camera systems. While I think this helps the Hasselblad brand recognition, I think it is a little sad that the V series is all that really remains of true Hasselblad cameras. The Xpan and H1 are Fuji products, though they are quite good systems. I really wonder if we will see anything new come out of Sweden. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Gordon Moat wrote:
While I think this helps the Hasselblad brand recognition, I think it is a little sad that the V series is all that really remains of true Hasselblad cameras. The Xpan and H1 are Fuji products, though they are quite good systems. I really wonder if we will see anything new come out of Sweden. I still wonder where you guys got the idea that the H1 was a Fuji product. Contact Hasselblad, and do ask how much of it is a Swedish product. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Gordon Moat wrote:
While I think this helps the Hasselblad brand recognition, I think it is a little sad that the V series is all that really remains of true Hasselblad cameras. The Xpan and H1 are Fuji products, though they are quite good systems. I really wonder if we will see anything new come out of Sweden. I still wonder where you guys got the idea that the H1 was a Fuji product. Contact Hasselblad, and do ask how much of it is a Swedish product. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Film is dead! | John Llort | 35mm Photo Equipment | 39 | September 28th 04 10:41 PM |
Who's left in the E6 biz? | [email protected] | In The Darkroom | 49 | September 22nd 04 07:23 AM |
Advice please, which film to use... | Graham Fountain | 35mm Photo Equipment | 5 | September 13th 04 09:15 PM |
The first film of the Digital Revolution is here.... | Todd Bailey | Film & Labs | 0 | May 27th 04 08:12 AM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |