When you respond to Jolly Roger, please quote the ENTIRE POST from Jolly Roger (because he hides behind archival tricks).

When you respond to Jolly Roger, please quote the ENTIRE POST from Jolly
Roger (because he hides behind google-groups non-archival tricks).

*Jolly Roger is, apparently, embarrassed by what he writes on Usenet.*
o He's apparently _afraid_ of his own posts being found, & quoted.

Why does Jolly Roger cowardly hide behind such non-archival tricks?
o I don't know why.

I suspect Jolly Roger has been proven so often to brazenly lie about iOS
functionality (e.g., he of all people on this planet, was the ONLY ONE who
knew EXACTLY what Apple was doing, at the time they did it, regarding the
secret-to-everyone-but-Jolly Roger-battery throttling software).

Jolly Roger often brazenly fabricates not only imaginary functionality, but
he and nospam incessantly fabricate imaginary CONVERSATIONS that never
happened.

Why?
I don't know why.

I think it's perhaps because apologists have no adult response to facts.

Nonetheless, my advice to others is to quote, in full, whenever responding
to the apologist who goes by the nym, "Jolly Roger".

Note: Normal Usenet etiquette is to quote only that which you directly
respond to.

--
These apologists are literally afraid of what they, themselves, post
because almost every post from them proves they own the mind of a child.

In article , Arlen Holder
wrote:


Nonetheless, my advice to others is to quote, in full, whenever responding

you routinely snip and selectively quote to take things out of context,
so you're not one to be giving such advice.



Note: Normal Usenet etiquette is to quote only that which you directly
respond to.

which contradicts your supposed advice to 'quote in full'