If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
infinity focus
infinity focus
whats the opinion here of it? I suppose those single-use 35mm cameras have infinity focus as there is no focusing mechanism. Set to it, the camera doesnt focus, thereby using less battery power. But is it worth it? Are the pics focused and properly exposed? I really do hate to pre-focus and hold the shutter button half-way and wait for the subject to be where I want it. Also, if using f/8, it takes longer to focus, thus the moment is gone by the time you take the pic. Also, center vs. multipoint focusing. Most pics taken using center focus are out of focus. Whats it used for anyway? I see no point in MF in P&S cameras as well. It time consuming and tedious. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
infinity focus
In article . com,
"Mr.Bolshoyhuy" wrote: infinity focus whats the opinion here of it? I suppose those single-use 35mm cameras have infinity focus as there is no focusing mechanism. Set to it, the camera doesnt focus, thereby using less battery power. But is it worth it? Are the pics focused and properly exposed? I really do hate to pre-focus and hold the shutter button half-way and wait for the subject to be where I want it. Also, if using f/8, it takes longer to focus, thus the moment is gone by the time you take the pic. No-focus cameras have the focus set a moderate distance out. With a tiny enough aperture and a low enough resolution, infinity is within the depth of field. A good DSLR camera with a bright lens will eliminate focus lag. Once you have a fast DSLR you'll never go back to pokey point'n'shoots. Also, center vs. multipoint focusing. Most pics taken using center focus are out of focus. Whats it used for anyway? I see no point in MF in P&S cameras as well. It time consuming and tedious. Center focusing is what I mostly use. I aim at what I want to be in focus, half-press, compose, and shoot. Multi-point is no good if you're opening the aperture to intentionally blur an ugly background. I finally figured out why you'd want to meter from a single point off-center - races. You can set a far edge focus point so you can get a focus lock before you're tracking the racer. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
infinity focus
On Apr 7, 8:02 pm, "Mr.Bolshoyhuy" wrote:
I really do hate to pre-focus and hold the shutter button half-way and wait for the subject to be where I want it. Also, if using f/8, it takes longer to focus, thus the moment is gone by the time you take the pic. can't you just use set focus, aperture, and shutter in manual mode? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
infinity focus
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 00:08:33 -0700, Bucky wrote:
can't you just use set focus, aperture, and shutter in manual mode? He can't. He has to learn how to. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
infinity focus
"Mr.Bolshoyhuy" wrote in message
ups.com... infinity focus whats the opinion here of it? It's particularly useful if you're photographing scenery through a window, to ensure that the camera doesn't mistakenly try to focus on reflections in the window. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
infinity focus
On Apr 8, 3:54 am, Neil Ellwood
wrote: On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 00:08:33 -0700, Bucky wrote: can't you just use set focus, aperture, and shutter in manual mode? He can't. He has to learn how to. funny. I was referring to P&S cameras. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
infinity focus
On 8 Apr 2007 09:16:53 -0700, "Mr.Bolshoyhuy"
wrote: On Apr 8, 3:54 am, Neil Ellwood wrote: On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 00:08:33 -0700, Bucky wrote: can't you just use set focus, aperture, and shutter in manual mode? He can't. He has to learn how to. funny. I was referring to P&S cameras. Owning a P&S camera does not automatically limit the user to no control. But, to answer your question, these cameras aren't limited or set to "infinity". The aperture and focus are set such that infinity is included in the DOF. How close the focus will go to is up to the designers. -- THIS IS A SIG LINE; NOT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY! The White House gave John Kerry's campaign nemesis Sam Fox, who funded the Swift Boat Veterans, a recess appointment to Belgium on Wednesday. Nothing ever changes. John Kerry insisted he was for the appointment before he was against the appointment. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
infinity focus
Kevin McMurtrie wrote:
snip No-focus cameras have the focus set a moderate distance out. With a tiny enough aperture and a low enough resolution, infinity is within the depth of field. Many years ago there was a term for the point at which a set focus would yield an acceptable sharpness for an object at "infinity" and also provide that same acceptable sharpness (circle of confusion) at the nearest point, for any given focal-length/f-stop combination. I have wracked my brain trying to remember that term, with no success; does anyone recall it? It _might_ have been "Hyperfocal distance". Allen |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
infinity focus
Allen wrote:
[] Many years ago there was a term for the point at which a set focus would yield an acceptable sharpness for an object at "infinity" and also provide that same acceptable sharpness (circle of confusion) at the nearest point, for any given focal-length/f-stop combination. I have wracked my brain trying to remember that term, with no success; does anyone recall it? It _might_ have been "Hyperfocal distance". Allen Correct. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperfocal_distance They give an example of focussing a 50mm lens working at f/16 to 5.2m, when everything from 2.6m to infinity is then "in focus". David |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
infinity focus
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:33:04 GMT, David J Taylor wrote:
Many years ago there was a term for the point at which a set focus would yield an acceptable sharpness for an object at "infinity" and also provide that same acceptable sharpness (circle of confusion) at the nearest point, for any given focal-length/f-stop combination. I have wracked my brain trying to remember that term, with no success; does anyone recall it? It _might_ have been "Hyperfocal distance". Allen Correct. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperfocal_distance They give an example of focussing a 50mm lens working at f/16 to 5.2m, when everything from 2.6m to infinity is then "in focus". That's probably a useful definition for 4"x6" snapshooters, but maybe not so good for others that occasionally make larger prints. Maybe a better way to put it with that example would be that for a specific print size, focus would be best at 5.2m, but at infinity and 2.6m, sharpness would still be pretty good, but noticeably inferior with closer than normal examination, or not very sharp in larger size prints. For larger print sizes where a "smaller circle of confusion" would be needed, the hyperfocal distance would move slightly closer to infinity from 5.2m, and the DOF would also decrease slightly with the "near" DOF border moving slightly closer to infinity from 2.6m (by 1/2 the change in the h.d.) and the "far" border remaining at infinity. And of course if you give pictures to one of our professed pixel peepers whose places his proboscis against the prints for perusal, all bets are off. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Q: Infinity focus being nothing of the sort | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 11 | July 4th 06 12:40 PM |
FinePix E900: how to focus to infinity | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | June 11th 06 08:10 PM |
How to determine infinity focus distance? | My View | Digital Photography | 8 | January 1st 05 05:46 PM |
How to determine infinity focus distance? | My View | Digital Photography | 0 | December 31st 04 08:09 PM |
Why "infinity focus" mode? | Roland Karlsson | Digital Photography | 25 | December 12th 04 06:02 PM |