You aren't going to pull that game with me, Mike

Mike Easter
Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:09:11 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

David wrote:
To review later

Consider the 'psychology' of googling someone whose persona
someone (ie BD/DB) has only casually encountered online.

Some would consider that malicious stalking and so brand BD/DB w/
intense criticism.

DB would consider it 'just fine' and 'flourish' his googling here;
or maybe accept it as an insignificant 'nosy parker' trait of his.

DB's friends here would also consider it 'just fine' or 'just
David being David' or even consider the findings of his 'person
google' to be fodder for discussion here.

To me, it is a negative trait and behavior that should NOT be
flourished; but, not /usually/ as 'evil' as others consider it,
until DB 'goes nuts' and weaponizes whatever he has found to make
others unhappy in the form of mean and hateful doxxing exposure.

It seems to me like DB treating some other persona like some kind
of 'bug' to be put on a pin in his little glass entomology case.
I don't think that most people want to be treated that way by
someone, particularly certain someones.

That 'going nuts' business is another matter.


Your efforts to save face after writing the horse **** you did
defending david aren't working as well as you're hoping. I don't have
a short memory, and I doubt many of the other regulars here do
either, Mike.

I'm not sure if it was you writing horse **** defending him, multiple
times, or completely unable/unwilling to even defend what you wrote,
multiple times that makes me call you out for the two faced, pos you
are these days. Ayep, piece of ****, hypocritical, joke.. Who's now
trying to put spin on what he previously wrote, defending david and
the bull**** david has been pulling for nearly two decades now.

You aren't going to pull that game with me, Mike. You falsely claimed
I'd bullied him, AND he wasn't a stalker, debating the ****ing
dictionary usage of the word, which incidently, confirmed HE IS A
STALKER. You and Apt both tried that bull**** routine. I wouldn't let
him slide on it either, and I damn sure won't let you.

Continue at the rate you're going with this and you'll be right up
there with snit for credibility value. It's probably just as well,
you've been off center for awhile now.



--
I'm not loafing. I work so fast I'm always finishedPath: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Diesel
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Search result
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 21:48:09 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 59
Message-ID: vBvQ471401MuKVecjzqKm2TVKxnZ2s1YK9
References:
Injection-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 21:48:09 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="35a863138dce3659993f802cc87457b6";
logging-data="27573"; "; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19qPf8PFUKTi4r+Y7HvefK6TGnBo1Bkl Aw="
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3wuiL2TnJDt/vKoBKckClAtdeEk=
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org alt.computer.workshop:42191

Mike Easter
Thu, 16 Apr 2020 13:09:11 GMT
in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

David wrote:
To review later

Consider the 'psychology' of googling someone whose persona
someone (ie BD/DB) has only casually encountered online.

Some would consider that malicious stalking and so brand BD/DB w/
intense criticism.

DB would consider it 'just fine' and 'flourish' his googling here;
or maybe accept it as an insignificant 'nosy parker' trait of his.

DB's friends here would also consider it 'just fine' or 'just
David being David' or even consider the findings of his 'person
google' to be fodder for discussion here.

To me, it is a negative trait and behavior that should NOT be
flourished; but, not /usually/ as 'evil' as others consider it,
until DB 'goes nuts' and weaponizes whatever he has found to make
others unhappy in the form of mean and hateful doxxing exposure.

It seems to me like DB treating some other persona like some kind
of 'bug' to be put on a pin in his little glass entomology case.
I don't think that most people want to be treated that way by
someone, particularly certain someones.

That 'going nuts' business is another matter.


Your efforts to save face after writing the horse **** you did
defending david aren't working as well as you're hoping. I don't have
a short memory, and I doubt many of the other regulars here do
either, Mike.

I'm not sure if it was you writing horse **** defending him, multiple
times, or completely unable/unwilling to even defend what you wrote,
multiple times that makes me call you out for the two faced, pos you
are these days. Ayep, piece of ****, hypocritical, joke.. Who's now
trying to put spin on what he previously wrote, defending david and
the bull**** david has been pulling for nearly two decades now.

You aren't going to pull that game with me, Mike. You falsely claimed
I'd bullied him, AND he wasn't a stalker, debating the ****ing
dictionary usage of the word, which incidently, confirmed HE IS A
STALKER. You and Apt both tried that bull**** routine. I wouldn't let
him slide on it either, and I damn sure won't let you.

Continue at the rate you're going with this and you'll be right up
there with snit for credibility value. It's probably just as well,
you've been off center for awhile now.
--
I'm not loafing. I work so fast I'm always finished
*************
Original post archived Sat, 18 Apr 2020 at:
http://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=ms...xnZ 2s1YK9%3E
or
https://urlzs.com/pGXjx