Why Drones should be registred...

Apparently some terrorists need their bootcamps...

http://tinyurl.com/jm6yx4h

https://fstoppers.com/news/drone-cra...lalom-nearly-h
itting-skier-105276
--
teleportation kills

On Dec 22, 2015, android wrote
(in article ):

Apparently some terrorists need their bootcamps...

http://tinyurl.com/jm6yx4h

https://fstoppers.com/news/drone-cra...lalom-nearly-h
itting-skier-105276

That was close!

Just wait, soon we will have some clown at an F1 race trying to get a
bird’s eye view. Judging by their inability to keep strolling fans off the
track I am betting on Singapore.
https://youtu.be/xIEiVfw-9fE

--

Regards,
Savageduck

On Dec 23, 2015, RichA wrote
(in ):

On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 23:30:49 UTC-5, android wrote:
Apparently some terrorists need their bootcamps...

http://tinyurl.com/jm6yx4h

https://fstoppers.com/news/drone-cra...lalom-nearly-h
itting-skier-105276
--
teleportation kills

Wow. You mean there is RISK to using some new technologies? Who'd have
thought. Lets control it. Lets BAN it. Americans once didn't think that way,
back when the U.S. was the greatest, most innovative country on Earth.

I think the air must be getting to you up there North of the border.

--

Regards,
Savageduck

In article
RichA wrote:

On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 23:30:49 UTC-5, android wrote:
Apparently some terrorists need their bootcamps...

http://tinyurl.com/jm6yx4h

https://fstoppers.com/news/drone-cra...lalom-nearly-h
itting-skier-105276
--
teleportation kills

Wow. You mean there is RISK to using some new technologies? Who'd
have thought. Lets control it. Lets BAN it. Americans once didn't
think that way, back when the U.S. was the greatest, most innovative
country on Earth.

Haven't you heard of the many instances where drones have gotten
way too close to air liners that were taking off or landing?

In article s, Jack
Ryan wrote:

Haven't you heard of the many instances where drones have gotten
way too close to air liners that were taking off or landing?

which instances are those? there have been some drone sightings by
pilots but none close enough to cause a problem.

On 2015-12-28 07:57:55 +0000, RichA said:

On Wednesday, 23 December 2015 19:40:12 UTC-5, Savageduck wrote:
On Dec 23, 2015, RichA wrote
(in ):

On Tuesday, 22 December 2015 23:30:49 UTC-5, android wrote:
Apparently some terrorists need their bootcamps...

http://tinyurl.com/jm6yx4h

https://fstoppers.com/news/drone-cra...lalom-nearly-h
itting-skier-105276
--
teleportation kills

Wow. You mean there is RISK to using some new technologies? Who'd have
thought. Lets control it. Lets BAN it. Americans once didn't think that way,
back when the U.S. was the greatest, most innovative country on Earth.

I think the air must be getting to you up there North of the border.


There are a lot of inventions that wouldn't have emerged as fast as
they did if the nanny state existed back when they were developed.

Lawn darts.

--
Regards,

Savageduck

RichA wrote:

There are a lot of inventions that wouldn't have emerged
as fast as they did if the nanny state existed back
when they were developed.

You mean the way that red flag laws impeded the development of
the automobile?

There have been "nanny state" laws of one sort or another for
a very long time.

Peter.
--

"nospam" wrote in message
...
In article s, Jack
Ryan wrote:

Haven't you heard of the many instances where drones have gotten
way too close to air liners that were taking off or landing?

which instances are those? there have been some drone sightings by
pilots but none close enough to cause a problem.

Chopper at DFW took one in the pilot's windshield and had to be landed by
the co-pilot.

It's only a matter of time before one gets ingested in an engine or a
cockpit window.

In article , NotMe wrote:

Haven't you heard of the many instances where drones have gotten
way too close to air liners that were taking off or landing?

which instances are those? there have been some drone sightings by
pilots but none close enough to cause a problem.

Chopper at DFW took one in the pilot's windshield and had to be landed by
the co-pilot.

one instance? that's it?

now tally up how many plane crashes have there been for other reasons,
such as pilot error, maintenance issues, atc mistakes and intentional
acts.

It's only a matter of time before one gets ingested in an engine or a
cockpit window.

birds pose a much greater danger.

In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:


It's only a matter of time before one gets ingested in an engine or a
cockpit window.

birds pose a much greater danger.

How many times are you going to bring up the obvious? No one's
disputing that birds pose a much greater danger.

yet they keep focusing on drones which pose almost no danger.

Those who support registration feel that one instance is one too many
if it can be prevented. Those who support registration feel that it's
a step to preventing a problem.

those people don't understand risk management.

they also don't understand that registration is a voluntary program
with no enforcement which won't stop someone intent on causing
problems.

I don't think it's an effective step, but my head isn't spinning
around like yours about it.

my head isn't spinning at all.