If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Some more Chrome comments
Hi there, only a few lines for each picture, as if I try to write
longer comments may be I never send them. And I think I prefer more comments than longer ones if I have to choose. Only saying that I've been out of the Shootin for quite a long time and that after shooting for chrome and reading the comments I'm happy I found it for the first time and happy for being round here again, I learn and enjoy a lot with this :-) Doug Payne: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586623 This wins for me. That soft ligth, the well polished metal and the straight and curved lines make a great balanced image. It makes you think about having that Pontiac in the garage and just sit there for hours staring at it Rich Pos: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586656 Unexpected. I thought we were all sending motorcycle exaust tubes and you send a head... I'm not sure if I like it or not, so I guess I do like it somehow :-) Jim Kramer: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586663 Nice eyes, amazing sharpness in them, but may be a little more depth of field would be better too much blur all around for me. Did you first saw the fly and thought about the Chrome mandate or you found it later when viewing the pictures at home? Mardon Erbland: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586924 Chrome's mission in life is to reflect things, so being yourself reflected is a great opportunity to say "Look! I was there!!" Good idea with the bolts, I couldn't find any chormed like those. I think that showing only one or two of those would have made a stronger image and telling the same story as they are easy to identify. Quercus: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586931 Man, next time use that little wheel and get a lower f-number, so you'll get lower depth of field and a more blurred background (the one you got isn't that bad anyway ;-) Duncan Chesley: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586959 It's a pity that Godot isn't polished, as Bobby seems to be staring at it thinking "what the hell is Duncan doing?". Nice shot. Bowser: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67589560 As I said to Mardon, I like photographers being reflected in things. And I know you chose that red t-shirt to look fine besides that truck :-) The yellow light is disturbing there, as others said, but probably it would be hard to get it out of the frame and keeping the "horn" so you can imagine the air flow that makes it sound, that I do like. So... :-? Ken Nadvornick: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67594765 Definitely, there is chrome here A bit too simmetrical for me, I would have tried a closer approach not to show the whole thing at once (and probably screwing the picture ;-) Nice exposure and sharpness anyway. Well done. Katarina Pantelic: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67664144 Same feeling as with Jim's picture, nice colors and nice sharpness, but too narrow DOF for me. Background seems to be far enough so you don't need such a blur in the corners and leaves. May be I just like macro pictures that way. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Some more Chrome comments
On 4 Oct 2006 09:48:37 -0700, "Quercus" wrote:
Duncan Chesley: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586959 It's a pity that Godot isn't polished, as Bobby seems to be staring at it thinking "what the hell is Duncan doing?". Nice shot. For some reason Bobby is always looking at me like that. Or maybe it's just me... Thanks, Q. Cheers, DuncanC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Some more Chrome comments
"Quercus" wrote in message oups.com... Hi there, only a few lines for each picture, as if I try to write longer comments may be I never send them. And I think I prefer more comments than longer ones if I have to choose. Only saying that I've been out of the Shootin for quite a long time and that after shooting for chrome and reading the comments I'm happy I found it for the first time and happy for being round here again, I learn and enjoy a lot with this :-) Bowser: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67589560 As I said to Mardon, I like photographers being reflected in things. And I know you chose that red t-shirt to look fine besides that truck :-) The yellow light is disturbing there, as others said, but probably it would be hard to get it out of the frame and keeping the "horn" so you can imagine the air flow that makes it sound, that I do like. So... :-? Well, I think you like my shot more than I do. You are correct, I was unable to frame and eliminate the damned yellow light, and I don't PS my images except for levels and resizing, so it stayed. It was a pretty nice truck, though. Loud, too. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Some more Chrome comments
Katarina Pantelic:
http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67664144 Same feeling as with Jim's picture, nice colors and nice sharpness, but too narrow DOF for me. Background seems to be far enough so you don't need such a blur in the corners and leaves. May be I just like macro pictures that way. hi Q, to tell you the truth, they were running away from each other, I had to grab what I could. but it always surprise me how nature can come up with such a crazy metalic colours... quite weird, don't you think? greetZ Cat |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
[SI] Some more Chrome comments
"Quercus" wrote:
Mardon Erbland: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586924 Chrome's mission in life is to reflect things, so being yourself reflected is a great opportunity to say "Look! I was there!!" Good idea with the bolts, I couldn't find any chormed like those. I think that showing only one or two of those would have made a stronger image and telling the same story as they are easy to identify. Thanks for the comments. Good to have you back at SI. It's interesting that you say a single nut might look better. That was exactly my intent when I first saw the wheel and the shots of 1 or 2 nuts, separated from the others, were the first that I took. Only after not feeling so sure of those images as seen in the viewfinder did I photograph the entire wheel as a fall-back idea. When I got to see them on my PC, I hated the images of only 1 or 2 nuts. I felt the entire wheel was much better. I'd be curious what you think. Here is a link to one of the single nut images. BTW, pretty much crop exclusively to a 3:2 aspect ratio. I know the image would look better if it were a bit more squarish but I impose the #:2 rule on almost all my images. Here's the single nut: http://www.JustPhotos.ca/transfer/021201.jpg |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Some more Chrome comments
http://www.JustPhotos.ca/transfer/021201.jpg
Much better the one with only one nut, IMHO. Due to the curved lines and other nuts round there, you can easily imagine that it is a wheel, so the idea is transmitted and you have all the picture to concentrate in the shapes and chrome thing. The reflected details in the nut, and in the wheel besides it, make a stronger image, nice DOF too. Definitely, I like this more than the one with the whole wheel -Quercus- Mardon wrote: "Quercus" wrote: Mardon Erbland: http://www.pbase.com/shootin/image/67586924 Chrome's mission in life is to reflect things, so being yourself reflected is a great opportunity to say "Look! I was there!!" Good idea with the bolts, I couldn't find any chormed like those. I think that showing only one or two of those would have made a stronger image and telling the same story as they are easy to identify. Thanks for the comments. Good to have you back at SI. It's interesting that you say a single nut might look better. That was exactly my intent when I first saw the wheel and the shots of 1 or 2 nuts, separated from the others, were the first that I took. Only after not feeling so sure of those images as seen in the viewfinder did I photograph the entire wheel as a fall-back idea. When I got to see them on my PC, I hated the images of only 1 or 2 nuts. I felt the entire wheel was much better. I'd be curious what you think. Here is a link to one of the single nut images. BTW, pretty much crop exclusively to a 3:2 aspect ratio. I know the image would look better if it were a bit more squarish but I impose the #:2 rule on almost all my images. Here's the single nut: http://www.JustPhotos.ca/transfer/021201.jpg |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Some more Chrome comments
"Quercus" wrote:
http://www.JustPhotos.ca/transfer/021201.jpg Much better the one with only one nut, IMHO. Due to the curved lines and other nuts round there, you can easily imagine that it is a wheel, so the idea is transmitted and you have all the picture to concentrate in the shapes and chrome thing. The reflected details in the nut, and in the wheel besides it, make a stronger image, nice DOF too. Definitely, I like this more than the one with the whole wheel -Quercus- Thanks for the additional feedback, Quercus. I think it's fascinating how people's taste in images can be just as diverse as their taste in foods. Once I saw the image of the single nut on my PC, I never even considered submitting it to the SI. It does absolutely nothing for me compared to the image of the full wheel. It's good that you've driven home to me the fact that my taste in images isn't always what other's like. I knew this already but an occasional reminder is good. Maybe I'll start shooting more compositions that I don't like! So --- off I go to shoot a soft focus, long shutter speed waterfall shot! LOL |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Some more Chrome comments
Mardon wrote:
"Quercus" wrote: http://www.JustPhotos.ca/transfer/021201.jpg Much better the one with only one nut, IMHO. Due to the curved lines and other nuts round there, you can easily imagine that it is a wheel, so the idea is transmitted and you have all the picture to concentrate in the shapes and chrome thing. The reflected details in the nut, and in the wheel besides it, make a stronger image, nice DOF too. Definitely, I like this more than the one with the whole wheel D -Quercus- Thanks for the additional feedback, Quercus. I think it's fascinating how people's taste in images can be just as diverse as their taste in foods. Once I saw the image of the single nut on my PC, I never even considered submitting it to the SI. It does absolutely nothing for me compared to the image of the full wheel. It's good that you've driven home to me the fact that my taste in images isn't always what other's like. I knew this already but an occasional reminder is good. Maybe I'll start shooting more compositions that I don't like! So --- off I go to shoot a soft focus, long shutter speed waterfall shot! LOL I like the whole wheel because it's more accessible: I don't have to shift up or down as many gears because it's more of a match with everyday eye-use. I like the 'single' nut because even in whole-wheel type images I almost invariably get down to that level, anyway; I'd have liked it even more if the viewpoint had been down a little and maybe a bit to the right, looking up some, so the object in the upper left could echo the main nut a little. Seems to me there'd have been enough of the wheel curve left in such a frame to evoke whole-wheelness. Any road, given the same task and surroundings I might have made the same choices, but not carried them off as well. I missed "chrome" due to lack of inspiration and fear of cliche-ness; however I _did_ photograph a (formerly) chromy thing a couple days ago: http://www.fototime.com/D9745D3AA4E9571/orig.jpg Morris (Minor?) nose embellishment. -- Frank ess |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[SI] Shoot-In, Chrome Comments | Mardon | 35mm Photo Equipment | 7 | September 30th 06 02:23 AM |
[SI} More Chrome Comments | Duncan Chesley | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | September 28th 06 04:49 PM |
[SI] Shoot-In - Repeating Shapes - Mardon's Comments | Mardon | 35mm Photo Equipment | 15 | May 19th 06 03:36 PM |
[SI] Twisted - Mardon's Comments | Mardon | 35mm Photo Equipment | 10 | May 8th 06 12:04 AM |
[SI] Not Quite Obsolete - Mardon's Comments | Mardon | 35mm Photo Equipment | 10 | April 4th 06 03:54 AM |