If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Photographying a church
I have been asked to photograph the families of my church parish for a
photo directory. I was asked because I do family portraits on the side. I have 99% of all the equipment, I own the lights, possible backgrounds, and I shoot medium format. My problem is that I have never shot a family in such a sterile environment before. Normally I am photographing families outside. How do I position a Mom, Dad, and four kids? Do I simply need stools of different heights? Should I have some standing and other sitting? Any and all tips are more then welcome. Sam -- http://www.miltonstreet.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Photographying a church
How do I position a Mom, Dad, and four kids? Do I simply need stools of
different heights? Should I have some standing and other sitting? Any and all tips are more then welcome. If you're asking that question, maybe you shouldn't be doing the job. I think it was Clint Eastwood who said it best - "A man's got to know hos limitations.' |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Photographying a church
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 at 15:55 GMT, Randall Ainsworth wrote:
How do I position a Mom, Dad, and four kids? Do I simply need stools of different heights? Should I have some standing and other sitting? Any and all tips are more then welcome. If you're asking that question, maybe you shouldn't be doing the job. I think it was Clint Eastwood who said it best - "A man's got to know hos limitations.' Based on the view point you put forth, one should never try something new. Did you ever stop to think that I might have ideas as to how to do it, but was looking for insight from people that have done this type of thing before? I just realized that I might have interpreted what you wrote incorrectly. Maybe that was your way of saying that doing a job like this is nothing more then a simplified version shooting one family's pictures. From experience, failed experience at that, I know that doing "production" work like a church shoot is VERY different from the way I, personally, do family/individual photos. Have you ever done production work like this before to backup view point? Did you posting rub me the wrong way, yea. But then I can also see where my initial posting was not the best phrased, either. My objective is simple: gather information from creditable sources, if you are a creditable source of knowledge on this subject, you might have a point! Sam |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Photographying a church
Relax Sam, what's the big deal? You're making more of this then you need to. Just make sure your focus is on the money. I have put people in a fake church setting using Photo Shop and nobody knew except the client. And they loved it! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Photographying a church
focus on the money = in focus.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Photographying a church
Based on the view point you put forth, one should never try something
new. Did you ever stop to think that I might have ideas as to how to do it, but was looking for insight from people that have done this type of thing before? If you don't understand the basic principles of portraiture, you're starting off in the minus column. I just realized that I might have interpreted what you wrote incorrectly. Maybe that was your way of saying that doing a job like this is nothing more then a simplified version shooting one family's pictures. From experience, failed experience at that, I know that doing "production" work like a church shoot is VERY different from the way I, personally, do family/individual photos. Have you ever done production work like this before to backup view point? I haven't done church directory work (I don't want the hassle) but I had a studio for 16+ years and have done photography in many forms since 1966. Did you posting rub me the wrong way, yea. But then I can also see where my initial posting was not the best phrased, either. My objective is simple: gather information from creditable sources, if you are a creditable source of knowledge on this subject, you might have a point! Understanding principles is important. Learning by doing when you're charging people money is not a good way to learn. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Photographying a church
I have to agree with the above respondents. If you have to ask then don't
do it. Rather practice in ones own time and expense, the quickest way to learn. To show I'm not totally angst, just bear in mind that most dark wooden churches suck up an awful lot of light. Posing and modelling is as per any other scenario. Upon rereading your post, you ask how to jazz up a church local. _Don't_. If that's what they want, that's what they want. Church folk tend often to be happy with the banal. Some gums, some teeth, what else matters. They often aren't art connoisseurs. Never-the-less a sunny day in the church gardens will offer lighting, ambience, and a general bonhomie that will auger well with the spirit of the occasion. You no doubt will be doing this for next to nothing so this may offer the most expedient solution. -- Otzi "Randall Ainsworth" wrote in message ... Based on the view point you put forth, one should never try something new. Did you ever stop to think that I might have ideas as to how to do it, but was looking for insight from people that have done this type of thing before? If you don't understand the basic principles of portraiture, you're starting off in the minus column. I just realized that I might have interpreted what you wrote incorrectly. Maybe that was your way of saying that doing a job like this is nothing more then a simplified version shooting one family's pictures. From experience, failed experience at that, I know that doing "production" work like a church shoot is VERY different from the way I, personally, do family/individual photos. Have you ever done production work like this before to backup view point? I haven't done church directory work (I don't want the hassle) but I had a studio for 16+ years and have done photography in many forms since 1966. Did you posting rub me the wrong way, yea. But then I can also see where my initial posting was not the best phrased, either. My objective is simple: gather information from creditable sources, if you are a creditable source of knowledge on this subject, you might have a point! Understanding principles is important. Learning by doing when you're charging people money is not a good way to learn. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Photographying a church
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 at 00:16 GMT, otzi wrote:
Upon rereading your post, you ask how to jazz up a church local. _Don't_. Man, oh man am I bad at explaining myself, let me try again... I have done plenty of individual and family portraits. I have shot individual portraits both on location and in my make shift studio, I own three White-Lightening strobes and a couple of back drops. I have only shot family portraits on location, never in my make shift studio because the lack of space to be creative. For this church shoot, I plain to keep things as sterile as possible: two lights, one 45 degrees of to the left as main and the second 10 degrees off to the right at one and a half stops under as fill. All the pictures will be head and shoulder shots. I know exactly how to post one and two people, I can manage three, but how does one post a family of six? Lets say I have a father 6'4", mother 5"6', and four kids ranging from 2"6' to 5"10', do I have them all sitting, some sitting and some standing? Keep in mind the final objective is a photo directory, so I want as little variant in each image as possible. What equipment should I have? Do I only need to have a fair number of stools for folks to sit on, or should I also have boxes for folks to stand on? Is there a formula folks have used to help insure that all the images look pretty much the same? I guess my point is that I know all the basics; I have not done something like this before and am hoping that there is someone out there that has which could provide some insight on does and don't as to make it run smoothly. Sam |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Photographying a church
For this church shoot, I plain to keep things as sterile as possible:
two lights, one 45 degrees of to the left as main and the second 10 degrees off to the right at one and a half stops under as fill. All the pictures will be head and shoulder shots. I know exactly how to post one and two people, I can manage three, but how does one post a family of six? You need to learn about lighting. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Photographying a church
I have been asked to photograph the families of my church parish for a
photo directory. I was asked because I do family portraits on the side. I have 99% of all the equipment, I own the lights, possible backgrounds, and I shoot medium format. My problem is that I have never shot a family in such a sterile environment before. Normally I am photographing families outside. How do I position a Mom, Dad, and four kids? Do I simply need stools of different heights? Should I have some standing and other sitting? Any and all tips are more then welcome. You want a weeks worth portrait workshop training in a usenet post? The good news is that you are bound to be better than 99% of the church directory shooters out there, whenever I see some god awful example of clueless lighting and graceless posing its a church photog, so by asking at least you show some hope of stepping up. Its not a matter of simply different heights, people are different heights and a group arrangement tends to be better when the heads are placed in compositionally appropriate positions. The classic is the pyramid. Dad (typically the alpha) at the peak. Even if dad is some wilty milk toast and mom is a mountainous weight lifter six inches taller social convention expects him to be Mr Familyman at the top of the heap. dad mom kid baby kid kid Ideally you don't want any two heads on the same level. Certainly not two heads of the same level NEXT to each other. For close ups of the parents, kids together etc, the taller one's mouth is usually at the level of the second's eyes. Ideally you want everybody the same distance from the camera. I know several photogs that will string from the tripod to the forehead of each person in a group. string is pulled out to the first posed person's forehead and pinched, then when he poses the next he holds the string out and has the person skooch or lean closer. This prevents distortions in head size, especially when some of these goofs are using a zoom lens at less than telephoto position, then they have a kid in back between the folks, and a line of kids in front and the babies and toddlers on the laps, four deep and you can see that the ones in front have heads a quarter or more larger than the kid in back. adjustable stools are great cause they allow you to possition the seat height for the height of the person, an inch or two difference makes a major difference in how the body fits, most of the time the seat is a bit to high, we are used to that so we don't really notice it, put someone in a seat too low and you see how they don't look right, (just came from a neighborhood meeting at the local elementary school...) bad seat height hurts far more than good seat height can help, but its the best place to start. go find some scrap lumber, two by wide, wider, widest. you will need some chunks to place stools on, or feet on, or butts on cause you want to position two things, each person for themselves, then each person in relation to the ones next to them. If things get confusing, in a group shot the more important thing is how each person position relates to the others. phone books, planks, catalogs, and for Mr and Mrs Jack Sprat, a huge soup pot might come in handy. Place the first folks at 45' angle to the camera, especially mom and dad. I usually 'prom' pose them or spoon them, mom in front of dad, baby on her lap, toddler on dad'd knee between him and ma, older kid perhaps standing by dad with hand on his arm. the kids I try to pose 45' the other way. babies, you will probably have lots of them. (and churchy families tend to have lots of them and they are radioactive, like heavy metals, close proximity of a 2 and a 3 quickly hits critical mass, and never EVER agree to photographing a 3 yo's birthday...) hold your hand out, palm up and thumb out. place the babies bottom there with the thumb between the legs. the other hand grabs the clothing between the shoulder blades, I try to get the mom to use her three lower fingers while the thumb and forefinger cradle the infants neck. She now has full control of the child, can tilt him up without fear of dropping him, and without horrid hunches in her back and shoulders. NO more Quassimodo mommies, please. Now that we've cleared that all up, please tell me that you will NOT place your umbrellas on either side of the camera like it seems they oughta be, please, (all the regulars on this list are now reaching for their delete or next button cause they fear I'll dredge up my usual sermon from my cultish Temple of the One True Light) This message is echoed to the z-prophoto mailing list at yahoogroups where you might find a lot of help in the archives... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
photograph church wedding without flash | Andrew Liu | General Photography Techniques | 9 | February 24th 04 12:58 AM |