A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » 35mm Photo Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

[SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #15  
Old September 17th 13, 07:49 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital
PeterN[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,246
Default [SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"

On 9/17/2013 1:40 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:41:57 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2013-09-17 08:23:10 -0700, George Kerby said:




On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article ,
"Bowser" wrote:

On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote:
On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote:
On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote:

Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013.

I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture
of the Capitol or the White House.

They sold out a long time ago.

True. But it's on ongoing sale.

Confirmed then: they are prostitutes.

Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over
politicians any day.


Is there a difference?


Have you ever been satisfied with any encounter with a politician?
With a prostitute there is always the promise of some sort of
satisfaction, however fleeting that might be.


Actually, I've had one experience in dealing with a politician, and no
experience at all dealing with a prostitute. My US Representative did
meet with me, and did take care of a problem for me. He was quite
efficient.


that was one politician that help.
When over 90% of the people surveyed want to ban gun ownership to people
with mental problems, whey hasn't backround check legislation passed.
http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm

Why does Congress refuse to allow Medicare to negotiate the price of
drugs., etc.


--
PeterN
  #16  
Old September 17th 13, 08:04 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default [SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"

On 2013-09-17 10:40:26 -0700, Tony Cooper said:

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:41:57 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2013-09-17 08:23:10 -0700, George Kerby said:




On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article ,
"Bowser" wrote:

On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote:
On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote:
On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote:

Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013.

I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture
of the Capitol or the White House.

They sold out a long time ago.

True. But it's on ongoing sale.

Confirmed then: they are prostitutes.

Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over
politicians any day.


Is there a difference?


Have you ever been satisfied with any encounter with a politician?
With a prostitute there is always the promise of some sort of
satisfaction, however fleeting that might be.


Actually, I've had one experience in dealing with a politician, and no
experience at all dealing with a prostitute. My US Representative did
meet with me, and did take care of a problem for me. He was quite
efficient.


Come to think of it I also had one such experience when I needed some
help with the State Department regarding my "step-daughter from
Hell"(she like her mother was a UK citizen). Senator Alan Cranston was
instrumental in having his office provide the assistance I needed.

....and I am still waiting for that prostitute provided satisfaction. ;-)
--
Regards,

Savageduck

  #17  
Old September 17th 13, 10:37 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital
J. Clarke[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,273
Default [SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"

In article , tonycooper214
@gmail.com says...

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:49:31 -0400, PeterN
wrote:

On 9/17/2013 1:40 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:41:57 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2013-09-17 08:23:10 -0700, George Kerby said:




On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article ,
"Bowser" wrote:

On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote:
On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote:
On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote:

Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013.

I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture
of the Capitol or the White House.

They sold out a long time ago.

True. But it's on ongoing sale.

Confirmed then: they are prostitutes.

Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over
politicians any day.


Is there a difference?

Have you ever been satisfied with any encounter with a politician?
With a prostitute there is always the promise of some sort of
satisfaction, however fleeting that might be.

Actually, I've had one experience in dealing with a politician, and no
experience at all dealing with a prostitute. My US Representative did
meet with me, and did take care of a problem for me. He was quite
efficient.


that was one politician that help.


Well, I asked one to help and he did so.

When over 90% of the people surveyed want to ban gun ownership to people
with mental problems, whey hasn't backround check legislation passed.
http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm


That isn't an example of a experience with a politician. While I
agree with you on the need - although I would take it further and have
much more stringent gun controls - you brought up comparing a personal
experience with a politician vs a personal experience with a
prostitute.


Besides, background check legislation was enacted 20 years ago, so the
politicians can be forgiven for not passing the same law again.

  #18  
Old September 18th 13, 12:46 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital
Eric Stevens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,611
Default [SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:37:17 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article , tonycooper214
says...

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:49:31 -0400, PeterN
wrote:

On 9/17/2013 1:40 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:41:57 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2013-09-17 08:23:10 -0700, George Kerby said:




On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article ,
"Bowser" wrote:

On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote:
On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote:
On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote:

Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013.

I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture
of the Capitol or the White House.

They sold out a long time ago.

True. But it's on ongoing sale.

Confirmed then: they are prostitutes.

Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over
politicians any day.


Is there a difference?

Have you ever been satisfied with any encounter with a politician?
With a prostitute there is always the promise of some sort of
satisfaction, however fleeting that might be.

Actually, I've had one experience in dealing with a politician, and no
experience at all dealing with a prostitute. My US Representative did
meet with me, and did take care of a problem for me. He was quite
efficient.


that was one politician that help.


Well, I asked one to help and he did so.

When over 90% of the people surveyed want to ban gun ownership to people
with mental problems, whey hasn't backround check legislation passed.
http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm


That isn't an example of a experience with a politician. While I
agree with you on the need - although I would take it further and have
much more stringent gun controls - you brought up comparing a personal
experience with a politician vs a personal experience with a
prostitute.


Besides, background check legislation was enacted 20 years ago, so the
politicians can be forgiven for not passing the same law again.


Tell them in Washington. :-(
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens
  #19  
Old September 18th 13, 02:38 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital
J. Clarke[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,273
Default [SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"

In article , tonycooper214
@gmail.com says...

On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:46:24 +1200, Eric Stevens
wrote:

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:37:17 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote:

In article , tonycooper214
says...

On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:49:31 -0400, PeterN
wrote:

On 9/17/2013 1:40 PM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:41:57 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2013-09-17 08:23:10 -0700, George Kerby said:




On 9/16/13 9:33 AM, in article ,
"Bowser" wrote:

On Sat, 07 Sep 2013 10:25:25 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:

On 2013.09.06 22:13 , PeterN wrote:
On 9/6/2013 4:45 PM, Alan Browne wrote:
On 2013.09.05 22:25 , Michael Benveniste wrote:
On 9/5/2013 1:21 PM, Bowser wrote:

Let's see what you've got. For Sale is due October 6th, 2013.

I won't be in Washington D.C. this month, so I can't submit a picture
of the Capitol or the White House.

They sold out a long time ago.

True. But it's on ongoing sale.

Confirmed then: they are prostitutes.

Now, now, there's no need to insult prostitutes. I'll take them over
politicians any day.


Is there a difference?

Have you ever been satisfied with any encounter with a politician?
With a prostitute there is always the promise of some sort of
satisfaction, however fleeting that might be.

Actually, I've had one experience in dealing with a politician, and no
experience at all dealing with a prostitute. My US Representative did
meet with me, and did take care of a problem for me. He was quite
efficient.


that was one politician that help.

Well, I asked one to help and he did so.

When over 90% of the people surveyed want to ban gun ownership to people
with mental problems, whey hasn't backround check legislation passed.
http://www.pollingreport.com/guns.htm

That isn't an example of a experience with a politician. While I
agree with you on the need - although I would take it further and have
much more stringent gun controls - you brought up comparing a personal
experience with a politician vs a personal experience with a
prostitute.

Besides, background check legislation was enacted 20 years ago, so the
politicians can be forgiven for not passing the same law again.


Tell them in Washington. :-(


Stores that sell guns in Florida are required to conduct background
checks. Not to worry, though, if you don't think you will pass. Just
go to a flea market and buy a gun. Don't want to wait until the
weekend for the flea market? Look on Craigslist and buy one today.
No background checks required by either seller.


Which is the general exception for private sales, which is a nod to the
reality that there is no practical way to police private sales of
firearms. When Grandpa kicks it and Grandma wants to get rid of his
guns, she's not going to consult a lawyer to find out that she has to do
background checks. That's the reality that Congress was dealing with,
and making a criminal out of Grandma is a political non-starter.
  #20  
Old September 18th 13, 02:52 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital
Savageduck[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,487
Default [SI] New Mandate: "For Sale"

On 2013-09-17 18:38:55 -0700, "J. Clarke" said:

In article , tonycooper214
@gmail.com says...


Stores that sell guns in Florida are required to conduct background
checks. Not to worry, though, if you don't think you will pass. Just
go to a flea market and buy a gun. Don't want to wait until the
weekend for the flea market? Look on Craigslist and buy one today.
No background checks required by either seller.


Which is the general exception for private sales, which is a nod to the
reality that there is no practical way to police private sales of
firearms. When Grandpa kicks it and Grandma wants to get rid of his
guns, she's not going to consult a lawyer to find out that she has to do
background checks. That's the reality that Congress was dealing with,
and making a criminal out of Grandma is a political non-starter.


In California all firearms transactions have to be conducted through a
dealer. Private sales must be facilitated by a dealer, the ten day
waiting period and background check is mandatory.
"In California, only licensed California firearms dealers who possess a
valid Certificate of Eligibility (COE) are authorized to engage in
retail sales of firearms. These retail sales require the purchaser to
provide personal identifier information for the Dealer Record of Sale
(DROS) document that the firearms dealer must submit to the DOJ. There
is a mandatory 10-day waiting period before the firearms dealer can
deliver the firearm to the purchaser. During this 10-day waiting
period, the DOJ conducts a firearms eligibility background check to
ensure the purchaser is not prohibited from lawfully possessing
firearms. Although there are exceptions, generally all firearms
purchasers must be at least 18 years of age to purchase a long gun
(rifle or shotgun) and 21 years of age to purchase a handgun (pistol or
revolver). Additionally, purchasers must be California residents with a
valid driver’s license or identification card issued by the California
Department of Motor Vehicles.
Generally, it is illegal for any person who is not a California
licensed firearms dealer (private party) to sell or transfer a firearm
to another non-licensed person (private party) unless the sale is
completed through a licensed California firearms dealer. A “Private
Party Transfer” (PPT) can be conducted at any licensed California
firearms dealership that sells handguns. The buyer and seller must
complete the required DROS document in person at the licensed firearms
dealership and deliver the firearm to the dealer who will retain
possession of the firearm during the mandatory 10-day waiting period.
In addition to the applicable state fees, the firearms dealer may
charge a fee not to exceed $10 per firearm for conducting the PPT.
The infrequent transfer of firearms between immediate family members is
exempt from the law requiring PPTs to be conducted through a licensed
firearms dealer. For purposes of this exemption, “immediate family
member” means parent and child, and grandparent and grandchild but does
not include brothers or sisters. (Pen. Code, § 16720.) Please note that
if the firearm being transferred is a handgun, the transferee must
comply with the Handgun Safety Certificate requirement described below,
prior to taking possession of the firearm. Within
30 days of the transfer, the transferee must also submit a report of
the transaction to the DOJ. To obtain the required report form (Report
of Operation of Law or Intra-Familial Handgun Transaction BOF 4544A),
either contact the DOJ Bureau of Firearms at (916) 227-7527 or download
the form from the DOJ’s website at http://oag.ca.gov/firearms/forms.
The reclaiming of a pawned firearm is subject to the DROS and 10-day
waiting period requirements."


--
Regards,

Savageduck

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SI] New Mandate - The letters "F", "G" and "S" Bowser 35mm Photo Equipment 0 August 27th 12 12:22 PM
[SI] New Mandate - The letters "F", "G" and "S" [email protected] Digital Photography 3 August 26th 12 02:20 PM
"Corset-Boi" Bob "Lionel Lauer" Larter has grown a "pair" and returned to AUK................ \The Great One\ Digital Photography 0 July 14th 09 12:04 AM
[SI] Weekly Reminder. The current mandate ("open") is due 2008.08.31 Alan Browne Digital SLR Cameras 9 August 18th 08 02:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.