A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » Medium Format Photography Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ultimate digital vs film: 1gp digital vs SR71 reconnaissance cameras



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old December 8th 04, 05:08 PM
columbotrek
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The film used in the SR71 looks like a large format roll film. Plus the
huge diameter lens is truly impressive looking. There must be a good
reason for wanting lots of film area when resolution is of prime importance.
  #12  
Old December 8th 04, 07:37 PM
Hemi4268
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The film used in the SR71 looks like a large format roll film. Plus the
huge diameter lens is truly impressive looking. There must be a good
reason for wanting lots of film area when resolution is of prime importance.


Actually there were lots of cameras aboard. They ranged from 35mm to 9.5
inches. The main camera was the 5 inch film size scan or OBC. The side
looking TOC's were 9.5 inch units.

Actually the whole system really didn't work all that well in a true
operational mode. Although the plane sure looked great.

Larry
  #13  
Old December 8th 04, 07:37 PM
Hemi4268
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The film used in the SR71 looks like a large format roll film. Plus the
huge diameter lens is truly impressive looking. There must be a good
reason for wanting lots of film area when resolution is of prime importance.


Actually there were lots of cameras aboard. They ranged from 35mm to 9.5
inches. The main camera was the 5 inch film size scan or OBC. The side
looking TOC's were 9.5 inch units.

Actually the whole system really didn't work all that well in a true
operational mode. Although the plane sure looked great.

Larry
  #14  
Old December 8th 04, 07:40 PM
Hemi4268
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't forget the advantages of having those optics in a vacuum and the path
from subject to optic is influenced by an ever decreasing proportion of
atmospheric interference.


Actually the vacuum caused more problems then in air. One of the big problems
is outgasing. Sort of like eating too many bakebeans.

Larry
  #15  
Old December 8th 04, 07:40 PM
Hemi4268
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Don't forget the advantages of having those optics in a vacuum and the path
from subject to optic is influenced by an ever decreasing proportion of
atmospheric interference.


Actually the vacuum caused more problems then in air. One of the big problems
is outgasing. Sort of like eating too many bakebeans.

Larry
  #16  
Old December 8th 04, 10:29 PM
Paul Friday
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Hemi4268
writes
Actually the whole system really didn't work all that well in a true
operational mode. Although the plane sure looked great.


Didn't it have the biggest radar signature ever seen?
A bit like the opposite of stealth, but too fast to catch anyway.
--
----------------------------
Paul Friday
  #17  
Old December 8th 04, 10:29 PM
Paul Friday
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Hemi4268
writes
Actually the whole system really didn't work all that well in a true
operational mode. Although the plane sure looked great.


Didn't it have the biggest radar signature ever seen?
A bit like the opposite of stealth, but too fast to catch anyway.
--
----------------------------
Paul Friday
  #18  
Old December 9th 04, 09:21 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

columbotrek writes:

The film used in the SR71 looks like a large format roll film. Plus
the huge diameter lens is truly impressive looking. There must be a
good reason for wanting lots of film area when resolution is of prime
importance.


Yeah, like about 11"x3000'.... Roll alright.

--
Paul Repacholi 1 Crescent Rd.,
+61 (08) 9257-1001 Kalamunda.
West Australia 6076
comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot
Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked.
EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be.
  #19  
Old December 9th 04, 09:21 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

columbotrek writes:

The film used in the SR71 looks like a large format roll film. Plus
the huge diameter lens is truly impressive looking. There must be a
good reason for wanting lots of film area when resolution is of prime
importance.


Yeah, like about 11"x3000'.... Roll alright.

--
Paul Repacholi 1 Crescent Rd.,
+61 (08) 9257-1001 Kalamunda.
West Australia 6076
comp.os.vms,- The Older, Grumpier Slashdot
Raw, Cooked or Well-done, it's all half baked.
EPIC, The Architecture of the future, always has been, always will be.
  #20  
Old December 17th 04, 12:08 AM
metchikabool
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Check out this Link

http://www.cliffordross.com/R1/R1.html


On 7 Dec 2004 08:12:00 -0800, "daveyp225" wrote:


jjs wrote:
"Judson McClendon" wrote in message
...

Take those declassified documents with a grain of salt.


I saw declassified satellite images around 1960 where you could
read the logo on the side of a truck. [...]


Mind if I Laugh Out Loud? If they (whomever 'they' are) said those

were
satellite images, then it was pure misinformation and served its

purpose in
that regard: you were fooled, and it may have frightened the Soviets

into
further spending themselves to oblivion.



I believe him. Have you ever heard of teraserver? It is a satelite
available to the public which can basically see your backyard. If such
tech is available to regular citizens now, dont you think the military
has at least that back then? I wouldn't be surprised if the military
can get your shirt size from satelites now.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ultimate digital vs film: 1gp digital vs SR71 reconnaissance cameras daveyp225 Large Format Photography Equipment 12 December 18th 04 10:01 PM
What will happen to classic film cameras? Mike Henley 35mm Photo Equipment 15 July 6th 04 06:24 PM
below $1000 film vs digital Mike Henley Medium Format Photography Equipment 182 June 25th 04 03:37 AM
Digital Imaging vs. (Digital and Film) Photography Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 9 June 19th 04 05:48 PM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.