If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Does a good lens help focusing?
I have an Olympus E500 which is fairly good,
but I want better focusing - if possible. Does a more expensive, or prime lens, give a better sharp focus generally? If so, what are the parameters I should look for in such a lens? pj |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Does a good lens help focusing?
On 2008-03-31 19:20:09 -0400, "Peter Jason" said:
I have an Olympus E500 which is fairly good, but I want better focusing - if possible. Does a more expensive, or prime lens, give a better sharp focus generally? If so, what are the parameters I should look for in such a lens? pj Yes. Hold all else equal, a faster (ie. Wider aperature) better quality lens will improve both the ability of your eyes and the AF system to focus quciker and faster. I stress all else being equal. Take the SLR or DSLR of your choice and put on a variety of lenses. Aperature has the largest effect. An F2.8 lens is easier to focuse than and F4.5 lens. The better and faster lenses will focus more quickly in a given light situaton. Now, you can not go comparing cameras. On the manual side, view finder quality has a lot to do with the your ability to focus. On AF systems the lens, the sensors, the motors, the processor and the focusing algorithms all have an effect. So, you can not say with an accuracy that a superb canon lens will focuse faster than an equal focal length Nikon or vice versa, as the cameras are different and introduce many factors. You need to pick a couple of camera/lens combinations for what you want to do and try them. -- jen ... not.. home...//// yahoo... com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Does a good lens help focusing?
Jim Nason wrote:
On 2008-03-31 19:20:09 -0400, "Peter Jason" said: I have an Olympus E500 which is fairly good, but I want better focusing - if possible. Does a more expensive, or prime lens, give a better sharp focus generally? If so, what are the parameters I should look for in such a lens? pj Yes. Hold all else equal, a faster (ie. Wider aperature) better quality lens will improve both the ability of your eyes and the AF system to focus quciker and faster. I stress all else being equal. Take the SLR or DSLR of your choice and put on a variety of lenses. Aperature has the largest effect. An F2.8 lens is easier to focuse than and F4.5 lens. The better and faster lenses will focus more quickly in a given light situaton. Now, you can not go comparing cameras. On the manual side, view finder quality has a lot to do with the your ability to focus. On AF systems the lens, the sensors, the motors, the processor and the focusing algorithms all have an effect. So, you can not say with an accuracy that a superb canon lens will focuse faster than an equal focal length Nikon or vice versa, as the cameras are different and introduce many factors. You need to pick a couple of camera/lens combinations for what you want to do and try them. This is not entirely true. Unless the sensor is specially designed, the way the focusing lenses on the AF module work will automatically make all lenses appear to be a fixed aperture - typically f6.3. No matter how much wider the lens is, the sensor can only 'see' f6.3 (rather like a viewfinder with a clear screen). Special sensors which can see f2.8 are added (example, my Sony A700 has one central sensor able to benefit from f2.8 lenses, the rest effectively reduce all lenses to f6.3). The Olympus E-500, I think, does not have any wide aperture sensors. I may be wrong, the specs need to be looked up, but I'm pretty sure it uses 'standard' sensors which may be f5.6 effective aperture limitation on the 4/3rds system. David -- Icon Publications Ltd, Maxwell Place, Maxwell Lane, Kelso TD5 7BB Company Registered in England No 2122711. Registered Office 12 Exchange St, Retford, Notts DN22 6BL VAT Reg No GB458101463 Trading as Icon Publications Ltd, Photoworld Club and Troubadour.uk.com www.iconpublications.com - www.troubadour.uk.com - www.f2photo.co.uk - www.photoclubalpha.com - www.minoltaclub.co.uk Tel +44 1573 226032 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Does a good lens help focusing?
All other things being equal, a lens with a maximum aperture of f1.4 will allow the autofocus to focus faster (and maybe more
precisely) than a lens with a maximum aperture of, say, f4 or less. That doesn't mean the pictures will be any sharper though. In fact, 'fast' lenses tend to be less sharp overall than 'slow' lenses of the same kind (ie prime or zoom), even when both are stopped down to the same aperture. One thing not to overlook if you're after better viewfinder clarity is making sure that the viewfinder diopter adjuster (if your camera has one) is correctly set for *your* eyes. That alone can make vastly more difference than changing lenses. Cheers -- cmyk "Peter Jason" wrote in message ... I have an Olympus E500 which is fairly good, but I want better focusing - if possible. Does a more expensive, or prime lens, give a better sharp focus generally? If so, what are the parameters I should look for in such a lens? pj |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Does a good lens help focusing?
David Kilpatrick wrote:
the way the focusing lenses on the AF module work will automatically make all lenses appear to be a fixed aperture - typically f6.3. No matter how much wider the lens is, the sensor can only 'see' f6.3 (rather like a viewfinder with a clear screen). I never heard of that, thanks. Here's a similar scenario: David Ruether talked about the viewfinder system's limitations. As I understand the viewfinder's ground glass allows some direct transmission to your eye (aerial image) and some of the image is captured on the ground glass freezing the aperture as the sensor will see it given it's size. What the eye sees directly is different though because the eye is a small sensor camera with much more depth of field, more like a pocket sized point & shoot camera. The part that gets locked into the ground glass shows translucently through the sharp eye image so you really have two apertures overlaid but it ends up looking more like about f/2.8 so for practical purposes. Theoretically an f/1.2 lens is no easier to focus than an f/2.8 lens manually although perhaps the partial ground glass image helps somewhat. I had thought maybe the dimensions of the mirror box limit apparent aperture in the viewfinder but the explanation of the translucent overlay makes more sense. Special sensors which can see f2.8 are added (example, my Sony A700 has one central sensor able to benefit from f2.8 lenses, the rest effectively reduce all lenses to f6.3). The Olympus E-500, I think, does not have any wide aperture sensors. I may be wrong, the specs need to be looked up, but I'm pretty sure it uses 'standard' sensors which may be f5.6 effective aperture limitation on the 4/3rds system. David |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Does a good lens help focusing?
"Peter Jason" wrote in message
... I have an Olympus E500 which is fairly good, but I want better focusing - if possible. Does a more expensive, or prime lens, give a better sharp focus generally? If so, what are the parameters I should look for in such a lens? http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tut...-autofocus.htm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Does a good lens help focusing?
Paul Furman wrote:
David Kilpatrick wrote: the way the focusing lenses on the AF module work will automatically make all lenses appear to be a fixed aperture - typically f6.3. No matter how much wider the lens is, the sensor can only 'see' f6.3 (rather like a viewfinder with a clear screen). I never heard of that, thanks. Here's a similar scenario: David Ruether talked about the viewfinder system's limitations. As I understand the viewfinder's ground glass allows some direct transmission to your eye (aerial image) and some of the image is captured on the ground glass freezing the aperture as the sensor will see it given it's size. I did a visual explanation of this using the Canon f1.2 85mm and compared an actual shot through the viewfinder, with live view: http://www.dphotoexpert.com/2007/09/...lr-viewfinder/ It shows exactly how much the translucency factor of the focusing screen affects apparent depth of field. The terminology used by makers for AF modules is confusing - they refer to special sensors which will work at 'f2.8 or greater'. Of course all the sensors work at f2.8 or greater, they just don't show any benefit. The special wide aperture sensors benefit from the wider aperture. David -- Icon Publications Ltd, Maxwell Place, Maxwell Lane, Kelso TD5 7BB Company Registered in England No 2122711. Registered Office 12 Exchange St, Retford, Notts DN22 6BL VAT Reg No GB458101463 Trading as Icon Publications Ltd, Photoworld Club and Troubadour.uk.com www.iconpublications.com - www.troubadour.uk.com - www.f2photo.co.uk - www.photoclubalpha.com - www.minoltaclub.co.uk Tel +44 1573 226032 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Does a good lens help focusing?
Thank you for all replies.
Peter |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: Large Zenza Bronica Lens-Focusing Ring & handle | [email protected] | Medium Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | August 7th 06 02:03 AM |
iris and focusing lens on flash | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 12 | January 11th 06 10:08 PM |
I have been told that only lens with auto focusing can be used with the Rebel body | John A. | Digital SLR Cameras | 6 | September 19th 05 07:55 PM |
Stiff-Focusing Canon Zoom Lens FD | Don Noble | 35mm Photo Equipment | 3 | August 12th 04 11:06 PM |
FS Nikon Nikkor-P 800mm f8.0 Super Telephoto lens with Focusing Adapter Great for Surfing Photography | Eugene | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | November 13th 03 10:12 PM |