Will it break the $3,000 mark?

[x-post added to rec.photo.digital, rec.photo.digital.slr-systems]

Andrey Tarasevich wrote:

Mark" wrote:

So please show a couple of instances where responsible folks complain
about *properly* x-posted material. I don't think you'll find them.

Many people screen crossposted material in an attempt to weed out spammers,
as I'm sure you're aware.
...

Rita's post is spam, no discussion about it. Moreover, it is that typical
scam-ish variety of spam, when it mentions 'it' but doesn't say what 'it' is.

Seeing that she took additional steps in order to prevent it doesn't make it
look better.

Rita also is *not* participating in this discussion (on r.p.e.35mm) or
the one on r.p..d.slr. That's the classic mark of an
improperly-multiposted message.

In fact, I'll crosspost this, and everyone's newsreaders will wonder
what's going on. Whee. How rude of me.