If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HDR Photography Anyone ?
Just finished reading a Popular Science mag which a client forgot here (
Nice mag ) There was a very brief article on HDR photography where you take a series of shots, from under exposed, all the way up to over exposed and pull them into a program like Photomatix or CS3 for processing. It's not a case of sandwiching them and out pops the perfect pic. Has anyone here tried this and is it more suited to certain types of scenes. The couple of photos in the mag looked fantastic. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
HDR Photography Anyone ?
Bernard Rother wrote:
Just finished reading a Popular Science mag which a client forgot here ( Nice mag ) There was a very brief article on HDR photography where you take a series of shots, from under exposed, all the way up to over exposed and pull them into a program like Photomatix or CS3 for processing. It's not a case of sandwiching them and out pops the perfect pic. Has anyone here tried this and is it more suited to certain types of scenes. The couple of photos in the mag looked fantastic. You will want to use moderation in the settings or it looks surreal. Often better results can be had from manual blending to simulate or actually using a graduated neutral density filter. Watch out for halos. I think the one I liked was dynamicphoto-HDR. The times I want it is when I don't know I want it and then I rely on working from one raw file which is OK but not great. For moderate enhancement it's pretty good though. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
HDR Photography Anyone ?
"Bernard Rother" wrote in message ... Just finished reading a Popular Science mag which a client forgot here ( Nice mag ) There was a very brief article on HDR photography where you take a series of shots, from under exposed, all the way up to over exposed and pull them into a program like Photomatix or CS3 for processing. It's not a case of sandwiching them and out pops the perfect pic. Has anyone here tried this and is it more suited to certain types of scenes. The couple of photos in the mag looked fantastic. HDR is only for static objects. Even the high speed DSLR cameras can't take 4 or 5 identical shots of a moving target. Trying to do it with a person requires them to remain perfectly still while you take several (identically composed) shots. Just blinking will ruin it. So the technology looks promising but the application of it is quite limited. Douglas |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
HDR Photography Anyone ?
On Dec 5, 9:16 pm, Bernard Rother
wrote: Just finished reading a Popular Science mag which a client forgot here ( Nice mag ) There was a very brief article on HDR photography where you take a series of shots, from under exposed, all the way up to over exposed and pull them into a program like Photomatix or CS3 for processing. It's not a case of sandwiching them and out pops the perfect pic. Has anyone here tried this and is it more suited to certain types of scenes. The couple of photos in the mag looked fantastic. Tried it after a club presentation on how-to of HDR. It works, but it indeed requires special subjects/scenes, and have not had a chance to try it on a good scene yet. I just shot a series off of back porch that did not have enough scene dynamic range to make a good result. One popular use is inside of big cathedrals and churches, where you can make the interior shadow detail visible without blowing out windows. The technique GREATLY reduces contrast- that is the idea- so it does create a weird surrealistic look- sort of more like a painting than a normal photo. It is for static scenes that have inherently a high dynamic range. Another example is a backlit subject (not a person- they would have to sit too still. Say a sunrise over a lake, where the lit sky and the beach/landscape which is very faint can both be visible in the final print. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
HDR Photography Anyone ?
Bernard Rother wrote:
Just finished reading a Popular Science mag which a client forgot here ( Nice mag ) There was a very brief article on HDR photography where you take a series of shots, from under exposed, all the way up to over exposed and pull them into a program like Photomatix or CS3 for processing. It's not a case of sandwiching them and out pops the perfect pic. Has anyone here tried this and is it more suited to certain types of scenes. The couple of photos in the mag looked fantastic. http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne...9407711&size=l Taken with a dirt cheap (and now obselete) Canon a540. BugBear |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
HDR Photography Anyone ?
Bernard Rother wrote:
Just finished reading a Popular Science mag which a client forgot here ( Nice mag ) There was a very brief article on HDR photography where you take a series of shots, from under exposed, all the way up to over exposed and pull them into a program like Photomatix or CS3 for processing. It's not a case of sandwiching them and out pops the perfect pic. Has anyone here tried this and is it more suited to certain types of scenes. The couple of photos in the mag looked fantastic. Here are a couple of HDR shots I did of the moon: http://www.pbase.com/craigbob/image/84712903 http://www.pbase.com/craigbob/image/84712907 -- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
HDR Photography Anyone ?
"Bernard Rother" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Just finished reading a Popular Science mag which a client forgot here ( Nice mag ) There was a very brief article on HDR photography where you take a series of shots, from under exposed, all the way up to over exposed and pull them into a program like Photomatix or CS3 for processing. It's not a case of sandwiching them and out pops the perfect pic. Has anyone here tried this and is it more suited to certain types of scenes. The couple of photos in the mag looked fantastic. As others have said, you have to work with static scenes, since the information should not vary from frame to frame. I was recently up on an abandoned part of the Great Wall of China, and was shooting from inside one of the guard houses. Using HDR to blend five exposures one f stop apart (handheld! but it worked with 5 fps) I was able to get a quite natural looking result where the bricks on the inside of the (basically completely dark) guardhouse were visible and just a couple of stops darker than the outside in broad daylight. If you are interested have a look he http://www.renderosity.com/mod/galle...age_id=1384632 Toby |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
HDR Photography Anyone ?
Toby wrote:
[] If you are interested have a look he http://www.renderosity.com/mod/galle...age_id=1384632 Toby Login required. David |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
HDR Photography Anyone ?
Toby wrote:
"Bernard Rother" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... Just finished reading a Popular Science mag which a client forgot here ( Nice mag ) There was a very brief article on HDR photography where you take a series of shots, from under exposed, all the way up to over exposed and pull them into a program like Photomatix or CS3 for processing. It's not a case of sandwiching them and out pops the perfect pic. Has anyone here tried this and is it more suited to certain types of scenes. The couple of photos in the mag looked fantastic. As others have said, you have to work with static scenes, since the information should not vary from frame to frame. It's even possible (but hard) to push that limitation, via alignment softwa http://www.luxal.eu/resources/hdr/hd...tutorial.shtml BugBear |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
HDR Photography Anyone ?
Bernard Rother wrote:
Just finished reading a Popular Science mag which a client forgot here ( Nice mag ) There was a very brief article on HDR photography where you take a series of shots, from under exposed, all the way up to over exposed and pull them into a program like Photomatix or CS3 for processing. It's not a case of sandwiching them and out pops the perfect pic. Has anyone here tried this and is it more suited to certain types of scenes. The couple of photos in the mag looked fantastic. I agree with others that HDR needs to be toned down a bit or else it can look cartoonish. Landscape, static scenes can look quite good though, if the settings are right: http://www.pbase.com/newbert/image/88088960/large If you want to try Photomatix, you can download a free trial nad make an unlimited number of images. However, the trial version will put watermarks all over them. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: One-Day-Left: 4 PHOTOGRAPHY BOOKS - SLR, Pentax, Lighting, New Joy of Photography, plus little bonus | Andy | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | August 31st 05 12:22 PM |
FA: 1-Day-Left: 6 Books - PHOTOGRAPHY - Photography Children - Existing Light - Kodak - Etc | Brad | General Equipment For Sale | 1 | June 15th 05 03:28 AM |
FA: 1-Day-Left: 6 Books - PHOTOGRAPHY - Photography Children - Existing Light - Kodak - Etc | Brad | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 1 | June 15th 05 03:28 AM |
FA: 1-Day-Left: 6 Books - PHOTOGRAPHY - Photography Children - Existing Light - Kodak - Etc | Brad | Darkroom Equipment For Sale | 1 | June 15th 05 03:28 AM |
FA: 1-Day-Left: 6 Books - PHOTOGRAPHY - Photography Children - Existing Light - Kodak - Etc | Brad | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 1 | June 15th 05 03:28 AM |