If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Good news for high volume data backup
In article ,
wrote: I gave up on that a while ago. I prefer to use two usb drives which I rotate, keeping one in my desk at work. Prior to this I kept DVDs at work. But given how inexpensive these disks are these days and how much quicker they are than burning DVDs, it's not a hard choice to make. i used to do the cd/dvd route too. what a royal pain in the butt that was. now, i have all my images on a single drive (backed up of course) and any image is easily accessible at any time, even when i travel. that would be impossible with dvds. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Good news for high volume data backup
"Alfred Molon" wrote in message ... http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsr...700383,00.html Warner chose to support only the higher capacity Blue Ray format (50GB per disk for Blue Ray vs. 30GB per disk for HD DVD). This could mean the death of the lower capacity HD DVD format and lower costs for Blue Ray disks due to their mass use (economies of scale). Of course on the downside for Blue Ray is that Sony is on their side. How can one argue with a company whose line of "successes" include: 1) Betamax 2) MD 3) 8mm video 4) Hi-8 video 5) Digital-8 video 6) Memory Stick and Memory Stick Pro 7) SACD 8) Li-Ion batteries used in Dell and other PCs (you remember, that enormous recall...) I've probably even missed some! Good news for all photographers who have to backup Gigabytes and Gigabytes of images :-) -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Good news for high volume data backup
Alfred Molon wrote:
In article , david- says... .. and I think I would prefer to copy one 250GB disk to the next 2TB (or whatever) rather than have to copy 60 DVDs. You can still do that. But you should keep backups on DVD just in case. I do agree with you, but then I ask, why? What is to say that a cheap-and-nasty DVD-R (the sort you can buy in the local shops) written on the cheapest DVD writer (the sort fitted to most PCs), is going to be more reliable? I'm proposing that my processed photos will be on 4 HDs, two 3.5-inch "live" disks, and two 2.5-inch portable backup HDs, one kept off-site. Cheers, David |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Good news for high volume data backup
In article ,
Alfred Molon wrote: In article , david- says... I'm considering whether I really want wallets and wallets of DVDs for backup - DVDs which may not be readable in a few years time. Instead, I'm thinking of a couple of portable 250GB 2.5-inch HDs...... A highly risky approach. One head crash and you lose everything. You need multiple backup copies no matter what the backup media is. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Good news for high volume data backup
On 5 Jan, 11:35, Alfred Molon wrote:
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsr...700383,00.html Warner chose to support only the higher capacity Blue Ray format (50GB per disk for Blue Ray vs. 30GB per disk for HD DVD). This could mean the death of the lower capacity HD DVD format and lower costs for Blue Ray disks due to their mass use (economies of scale). Good news for all photographers who have to backup Gigabytes and Gigabytes of images :-) -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum athttp://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/http://myolympus.org/photo sharing site did you ever consider compressing the files first ?? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Good news for high volume data backup
Alfred Molon wrote:
http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsr...700383,00.html Warner chose to support only the higher capacity Blue Ray format (50GB per disk for Blue Ray vs. 30GB per disk for HD DVD). This could mean the death of the lower capacity HD DVD format and lower costs for Blue Ray disks due to their mass use (economies of scale). Good news for all photographers who have to backup Gigabytes and Gigabytes of images :-) Well, it will sell more players... I am still not convinced that optical media is reliable enough for my backups. I have rented entirely too many unplayable DVDs. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Good news for high volume data backup
Bolshoi wrote:
On 5 Jan, 11:35, Alfred Molon wrote: http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsr...700383,00.html Warner chose to support only the higher capacity Blue Ray format (50GB per disk for Blue Ray vs. 30GB per disk for HD DVD). This could mean the death of the lower capacity HD DVD format and lower costs for Blue Ray disks due to their mass use (economies of scale). Good news for all photographers who have to backup Gigabytes and Gigabytes of images :-) -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum athttp://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/http://myolympus.org/photo sharing site did you ever consider compressing the files first ?? Did you every try compressing JPEGs? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Good news for high volume data backup
Bolshoi wrote:
did you ever consider compressing the files first ?? JPEG is already a compressed format. Even much more elaborate (read: much more expensive) compression algorithms won't be able to squeeze them more than a very few percentage points tighter. If you are talking about RAW then that's a different animal, of course. jue -- "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Good news for high volume data backup
In article , says...
did you ever consider compressing the files first ?? JPEGs are already compressed. Compressing the RAW files would reduce their size to a bit over half, but it's not that practical (you have to decompress the files to be able to use them and this takes time). Besides, should there be some data damage to individual bytes, with an uncompressed file only one pixel or also its neighbours are affected, while if it's a compressed file the damage is much greater. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 50X0, 8080, E3X0, E4X0, E5X0 and E3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Good news | jolitani | Digital Photography | 0 | December 24th 07 08:19 PM |
CHDK NEWS: High-Speed Photography Breaks New Records! | Dave G | Digital Photography | 3 | December 3rd 07 10:18 AM |
CHDK NEWS: High-Speed Photography Breaks New Records! | Dave G | Digital ZLR Cameras | 0 | December 2nd 07 12:19 AM |
Good backup camera? | jmc | Digital Photography | 12 | February 18th 07 05:42 PM |
More on Canon Rebel XT noise at high ISO - 2 main new data points | All Things Mopar | Digital SLR Cameras | 139 | January 16th 06 08:10 AM |