Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial airliner"

wrote:

I can't get past the "controlled demolition" explanation. I've worked in
a bunch of skyscrapers. Workmen are always questioned.

In established buildings maybe. In a new building just occupied a few
weeks, a thief did wallets and purses on four floors before I asked him
WTF are you doing. "Testing power points" was the reply that satisfied
my co-workers. I ignored my boss and rang security before anything was done.

lol, it wasn't until I walked into the CEO's office (large state
govenment department) and left a note a couple of years that they
actually start to put in security systems to prevent members ofthe
public justdoing the same.

but that doesn't alter your point.

And planting explosives secretly amongst tens of thousands of
bored busybodies seems like a difficult task to me.

Weekend work?
Pillar safety check?

That work is done by specialty firms. Lots
and lots of manhours would be needed for two giant buildigs. It seems
unlikely to me that the work could have been carried out in secret.

Agreed,

On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:42:46 +0000 (UTC),
wrote:

In misc.survivalism wrote:

I also have questions about how the explosives for the controlled
demolition were placed without tens of thousands of office workers knowing
that it was being done, but that can wait for another day.

To believe this crap, you'd have to
believe in the most complex and bizarre conspiracy imaginable.

I can't get past the "controlled demolition" explanation. I've worked in
a bunch of skyscrapers. Workmen are always questioned. And planting
explosives secretly amongst tens of thousands of bored busybodies seems
like a difficult task to me. That work is done by specialty firms. Lots
and lots of manhours would be needed for two giant buildigs. It seems
unlikely to me that the work could have been carried out in secret.

Setting up explosives for controlled demolition of two tall buildings is
even more complicated than most people realize. Miles of cables need to be
run across office space in order to pull the beams in the right direction.
Also, those support beams have to be cut nearly all the way through in
order to help the bombs do their jobs. Again, the bombs have to be planted
in the right spots and some would be in plain sight. They just can't be
lobbed in hidden crawl spaces when everyone goes home. You would also need
to hide giant spools of wiring that would be needed to wire all the bombs.
Finally, bombs are not stable. The intense heat caused by those
"distracting" planes hitting the towers would have exploded the bombs out
of sequence and/or destroyed the connecting wires.

--
Deja Vu: The feeling that somehow, somewhere, you've been kicked in the
head like this before.


9/13/2007 10:26:36 PM

On Sep 13, 9:01 pm, "SGT. Major" wrote:
wrote in message

oups.com...

So, I suppose you think Wikipedia, CNN, Pakistan, etc is part of a big
conspiracy too? Or are you just an American bashing skunk who likes
to lie and support terrorists who kill women and children?

Idiot. Now try to find all Georgie's past on the net, including when he was
governor in Texas. What do you think happened to it all? You parrot what
you are told to. You don't think Wikipedia can be changed? You're a bigger
doofus than I originally said. I can go in and change Wikipedia. Wikipedia
is run by kids, that's right kids.

American bashing? This American would like to cave your thick skull in.

You support a wet dream. You have shown your true colors, "yellow".

Support terrorists? Your ilk makes me sick. You parrot your Limpballs idol,
and think because you can hide behind a screen, it makes you big. I'll bet
your ass is bigger than Limpballs.

Who's killing women and children? Your chicken hawk ilk has killed more
children, than any "terrorists" ever have.

I fought to give your kind the right to type what you want, and your
chicken **** president wants to invade and see what you write. And, you
stand there cheering on the sidelines. You're as UN-American as they come.

I know you're all for stomping constitutional rights. I'm all for stomping
your kind into the ground.

Go ahead and laugh on true Americans graves. That's what makes you feel
good.



Yep, just as I thought. No credible facts to support your assertions
that grow wilder and more absurd with each post. Just raw
emotion, hatred and baseless conspiracy theories that give aid and
comfort to the terrorists who killed 3000 Americans and are still
trying to kill us all.

wrote:
Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:

"That was no American Airlines jet"

"It was a military plane"

"It was definitely no airliner"

Watch:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY


What a crock!
American Airlines is headquartered here, and you can bet the people here
KNOW you are nuts. Their friends were on those planes!
Stop spreading terrorist nonsense.

On Sep 13, 7:38 pm, Rocinante wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:42:46 +0000 (UTC),
wrote:

In misc.survivalism wrote:

I also have questions about how the explosives for the controlled
demolition were placed without tens of thousands of office workers knowing
that it was being done, but that can wait for another day.

To believe this crap, you'd have to
believe in the most complex and bizarre conspiracy imaginable.

I can't get past the "controlled demolition" explanation. I've worked in
a bunch of skyscrapers. Workmen are always questioned. And planting
explosives secretly amongst tens of thousands of bored busybodies seems
like a difficult task to me. That work is done by specialty firms. Lots
and lots of manhours would be needed for two giant buildigs. It seems
unlikely to me that the work could have been carried out in secret.

Setting up explosives for controlled demolition of two tall buildings is
even more complicated than most people realize. Miles of cables need to be
run across office space in order to pull the beams in the right direction.
Also, those support beams have to be cut nearly all the way through in
order to help the bombs do their jobs. Again, the bombs have to be planted
in the right spots and some would be in plain sight. They just can't be
lobbed in hidden crawl spaces when everyone goes home. You would also need
to hide giant spools of wiring that would be needed to wire all the bombs.
Finally, bombs are not stable. The intense heat caused by those
"distracting" planes hitting the towers would have exploded the bombs out
of sequence and/or destroyed the connecting wires.

--
Deja Vu: The feeling that somehow, somewhere, you've been kicked in the
head like this before.


9/13/2007 10:26:36 PM

Of course there is the uncomfortable fact that that work takes a lot
of people a loooonnnnggg time to do. Also stripping away walls and
column coverings making one HUGE mess. Winding up with miles of det
cord strung everywhere.

Of course in kookville, none of that would have been noticed.

Harry K

In article .com,
Jim34 wrote:
On Sep 13, 8:14 pm, wrote:

I also have questions about how the explosives for the controlled
demolition were placed without tens of thousands of office workers knowing
that it was being done, but that can wait for another day.

http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/3...tshaftsut3.jpg

Mechanical Engineer explains how demolitions charges were place on the
welded joints on the WTC beams that ran up the center of the towers.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...66025292753615



Each and every beam was examined by at least one civil engineer before
it was shipped to China. A couple thousands were kept for analysis.
1,300 are in storage here;

http://www.amny.com/entertainment/ne...allery?index=1
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...63656282270164


There is no eyewitness or audio/video record of explosions of size and
placement and timing consistent with the collapse of any of the towers
on 9/11.

In 1993, a 1000 pound bomb in the basement of a tower was loud enough
to be heard for blocks around and powerful enough to destroy several
floors of reinforced concrete yet it was nowhere close to weakening
the tower's structure. In 2001, any bomb would have to be as bigger
and louder to have any effect.





There is no eyewitness or audio/video record of explosions of size and
placement and timing consistant with the collapse of any of the towers
on 9/11.

In 1993, a 1000 pound bomb in the basement of a tower was loud enough
to be heard for blocks around and powerful enough to destroy several
floors of re-inforced concrete yet it nome nowhere close to weakening
the tower's strucuture. In 2001, any bomb would bave to be as bigger
and louder to have any effect.



--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore. A Proud signature since 2001

On 9/13/07 4:56 PM, in article
t, "Jonathan"
wrote:

Paul Heslop wrote:
wrote:

Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:

"That was no American Airlines jet"

"It was a military plane"

"It was definitely no airliner"

sod off you nutter

Wahahaha........You sure are one stupid one. This is all you have? 12 Arabs
that never flew a jumbo jet learned from a video game and this is what you
think is the "truth". Wahhahaha.....What a loon...........


It is nothing to fly once in the air. These motherf--kers didn't *want* to
know how to take off or land according to FL flight instructors.
YOU are the goon ey bird in here.

On 9/13/07 5:27 PM, in article , "Paul
Heslop" wrote:

Jonathan wrote:

Paul Heslop wrote:
wrote:

Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:

"That was no American Airlines jet"

"It was a military plane"

"It was definitely no airliner"

sod off you nutter

Wahahaha........You sure are one stupid one. This is all you have? 12 Arabs
that never flew a jumbo jet learned from a video game and this is what you
think is the "truth". Wahhahaha.....What a loon...........

Do you use your right hand or your left hand for that Jonathan?

DAMN! I snorted coffee on that one!

George Kerby wrote:

Do you use your right hand or your left hand for that Jonathan?

DAMN! I snorted coffee on that one!

:O) Nice to know it happens to other people too

--
Paul (We won't die of devotion)
-------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/

On 9/13/07 6:13 PM, in article
, "Not Disclosed"
wrote:

wrote:
Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:

"That was no American Airlines jet"

"It was a military plane"

"It was definitely no airliner"

Watch:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY


Hmmmm, why would people on the ground at the time of the crashes say;

"That was no American Airlines jet"

Because some k00k remastered the video, the aicraft was definately a
Boeing 757.

Not to mention the doctored audio loop that a Dalmatian could detect.