If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lens perspective distortion and DSLR crop factor
Hi all,
I attended the Rocky Mountain School of Photography last week and their equipment guru made a claim that is inconsistent with my earlier understanding of an issue related to Crop Sensor DSLRs. Maybe someone out there could clarify for me. I have always been under the understanding that if I took a Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 zoom and took photos with the following two bodies, the resulting images would be exactly the same if we were to ignore pixel density and quality differences of the zoom at different focal lengths: Canon 30D @ 31.25mm focal length, 5 feet from subject Canon 5D @ 50mm focal length, 5 feet from subject According to the individual at Rocky Mountain, the lens (perspective) distortion normally associated with wide-angle shots (traditional 35mm film) would be evident on the 30D example above because this perspective distortion is inherent to the wide angle lens. My understanding was that this was false and that the distortion is a result of distance to subject. Could somebody please clarify this issue for me? Regards, Paul |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lens perspective distortion and DSLR crop factor
wrote in message
oups.com... Hi all, I attended the Rocky Mountain School of Photography last week and their equipment guru made a claim that is inconsistent with my earlier understanding of an issue related to Crop Sensor DSLRs. Maybe someone out there could clarify for me. I have always been under the understanding that if I took a Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 zoom and took photos with the following two bodies, the resulting images would be exactly the same if we were to ignore pixel density and quality differences of the zoom at different focal lengths: Canon 30D @ 31.25mm focal length, 5 feet from subject Canon 5D @ 50mm focal length, 5 feet from subject According to the individual at Rocky Mountain, the lens (perspective) distortion normally associated with wide-angle shots (traditional 35mm film) would be evident on the 30D example above because this perspective distortion is inherent to the wide angle lens. My understanding was that this was false and that the distortion is a result of distance to subject. Could somebody please clarify this issue for me? You're correct - wide angle distortion is a function of distance to subject only, and the zoom settings you describe should perfectly cancel out the 1.6 crop factor, modulo lens distortion and shifting of the nodal point. This is a very common misconception, similar to the belief that DOF is less for a telephoto than a wide angle. -- Mike Russell www.curvemeister.com/forum/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Lens perspective distortion and DSLR crop factor
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lens perspective distortion and DSLR crop factor
On May 13, 7:08 pm, wrote:
Hi all, I attended the Rocky Mountain School of Photography last week and their equipment guru made a claim that is inconsistent with my earlier understanding of an issue related to Crop Sensor DSLRs. Maybe someone out there could clarify for me. I have always been under the understanding that if I took a Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 zoom and took photos with the following two bodies, the resulting images would be exactly the same if we were to ignore pixel density and quality differences of the zoom at different focal lengths: Canon 30D @ 31.25mm focal length, 5 feet from subject Canon 5D @ 50mm focal length, 5 feet from subject According to the individual at Rocky Mountain, the lens (perspective) distortion normally associated with wide-angle shots (traditional 35mm film) would be evident on the 30D example above because this perspective distortion is inherent to the wide angle lens. My understanding was that this was false and that the distortion is a result of distance to subject. Could somebody please clarify this issue for me? You are right, he is wrong. There might be some small differences in the amount of pincushion distortion, but this is not the same as perspective. Scott Scott |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lens perspective distortion and DSLR crop factor
On May 14, 12:08 am, wrote:
Hi all, I attended the Rocky Mountain School of Photography last week and their equipment guru made a claim that is inconsistent with my earlier understanding of an issue related to Crop Sensor DSLRs. Maybe someone out there could clarify for me. I have always been under the understanding that if I took a Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 zoom and took photos with the following two bodies, the resulting images would be exactly the same if we were to ignore pixel density and quality differences of the zoom at different focal lengths: Canon 30D @ 31.25mm focal length, 5 feet from subject Canon 5D @ 50mm focal length, 5 feet from subject According to the individual at Rocky Mountain, the lens (perspective) distortion normally associated with wide-angle shots (traditional 35mm film) would be evident on the 30D example above because this perspective distortion is inherent to the wide angle lens. My understanding was that this was false and that the distortion is a result of distance to subject. Could somebody please clarify this issue for me? Regards, Paul Ah, the problem may be that there are TWO definitions of distortion. To an optical engineer and lens designer, distortion means that the field angle to any point in the image is not exactly the same as the field angle of the input point. This kind of distortion IS reduced by reducing the format used by a lens, and hence by the cropping done by digicams. That is, the distortion increases with distance from the optical axis, which intersects the image plane at the center of the image for most cameras. Thus cropping does not use the wide field angles and does reduce this form of distortion. Perspective distortion is another issue. This is the APPARENT distortion of perspective caused by viewing an image from a different effective vantage point than what it was taken at. This is especially due to the fact that wide angle prints would require viewing from a distance closer to the print than our eyes can focus at. This type of distortion is ONLY a function of the taking and viewing distances, and has no dependence on focal length of lens. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Lens perspective distortion and DSLR crop factor
Don Stauffer in Minnesota writes:
Canon 30D @ 31.25mm focal length, 5 feet from subject Canon 5D @ 50mm focal length, 5 feet from subject Ah, the problem may be that there are TWO definitions of distortion. To an optical engineer and lens designer, distortion means that the field angle to any point in the image is not exactly the same as the field angle of the input point. This kind of distortion IS reduced by reducing the format used by a lens, and hence by the cropping done by digicams. That is, the distortion increases with distance from the optical axis, which intersects the image plane at the center of the image for most cameras. Thus cropping does not use the wide field angles and does reduce this form of distortion. That would be pretty much always true if both cameras were using the same lens, but the 30D was using less of the image circle than the 5D. However, that's not the case here. The two cameras are using different focal length lenses in order to match the field of view, and so the field angles at the corner of the image are exactly the same for both of the proposed cases. So either camera could see slightly more distortion than the other, depending on the distortion performance of the two lens designs. Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Lens perspective distortion and DSLR crop factor
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Lens perspective distortion and DSLR crop factor
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Lens perspective distortion and DSLR crop factor
wrote in message
oups.com... I attended the Rocky Mountain School of Photography last week and their equipment guru made a claim that is inconsistent with my earlier understanding of an issue related to Crop Sensor DSLRs. Maybe someone out there could clarify for me. I have always been under the understanding that if I took a Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 zoom and took photos with the following two bodies, the resulting images would be exactly the same if we were to ignore pixel density and quality differences of the zoom at different focal lengths: Canon 30D @ 31.25mm focal length, 5 feet from subject Canon 5D @ 50mm focal length, 5 feet from subject Yes, with two qualifications: 1) The lens might have different rectilinear distortion characteristics at different zoom settings. So, for example, it might have some barrel distortion at 31.25mm that it does not have at 50mm. 2) To get the same depth of field, you would have to adjust the aperture to compensate for the difference in focal length. Since subject-camera distance is the same, you would need the absolute size of the aperture to be the same. So, for example, if the 31.25mm setting was at f/4, then the aperture would be 7.8125mm in diameter. To obtain the same diameter at a 50mm setting, you would need f/6.4. According to the individual at Rocky Mountain, the lens (perspective) distortion normally associated with wide-angle shots (traditional 35mm film) would be evident on the 30D example above because this perspective distortion is inherent to the wide angle lens. Well, now you know one instructor not to believe. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to Correct Perspective Distortion in Photoshop | Blair | Digital SLR Cameras | 30 | March 15th 07 07:34 AM |
How to Correct Perspective Distortion in Photoshop | Blair Howard | Digital Photography | 6 | March 13th 07 11:52 PM |
How to calculate the change of angle of view when to crop factor of the DSLR is known when using full frame lans | Mulperi | Digital Photography | 3 | September 18th 06 08:25 PM |
Crop factor and lens resolution | Erick | Digital SLR Cameras | 12 | December 4th 05 12:30 AM |
EOS 20D...1.6x Crop Factor...Do you actually see it while shooting? | Jay Beckman | Digital SLR Cameras | 42 | January 5th 05 10:57 AM |