If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a digital camera with wide angle lens (equivalent of 28mm on a film camera)...
I have a Canon G2 which is about 28mm on the wide end. But my experience with interiors is that you need WIDE, as in as wide as you can get without fisheye effects. You can get many P&S types that will let you put an adapter that you take a quality hit, plus the cost you might as well invest in a dslr. ... for shooting interiors (for real estate webpage) I know this can be done with a digital SLR, but would prefer not having to go to that expense. Are there any other options?? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a digital camera with wide angle lens (equivalent of 28mm on a film camera)...
"Doghouse Riley" wrote in message ... ... for shooting interiors (for real estate webpage) I know this can be done with a digital SLR, but would prefer not having to go to that expense. Are there any other options?? 28mm is NOT wide enough for a large percentage of interior shots. Also...If you want to create images for ads that really show off the size of the room...then the wider the better. If you change your mind about SOME additional expense, then I would recommend you consider spending about $1500. --This would get you the Canon Digital Rebel, and the excellent 17-40mm f4 L lens. This combination would be ideal for your needs in my opinion. It would also be worth purchasing the 420EX shoe-mounted flash. Built-in flash will simply not present interiors well. Bottom line: While it may be a slightly large outlay in the short term, the long term RESULTS of presenting high quality, appropriately wide angled shots that truly show off your properties will TRULY repay the cost many times. In the real estate shopping world, pictures are everything in terms of actually getting people to visit the property. Crummy pictures mean very short lists of visitors or potential buyers. Invest. You won't be sorry. Canon Digital Rebel: $799 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=297500&is=REG Canon 17-40 f4 L lens: $689 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=279582&is=USA Canon 420EX flash: $179 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=206436&is=USA Total cost (no flash): $1489.90 With flash: 1669.85 Mark M |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a digital camera with wide angle lens (equivalent of 28mm on a film camera)...
A cheap good working way would be the
Canon A300 or A310 small 3.2mg camera with a very wide angle lens. Excellent for just web pages, and cheap too. "Doghouse Riley" wrote in message ... ... for shooting interiors (for real estate webpage) I know this can be done with a digital SLR, but would prefer not having to go to that expense. Are there any other options?? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a digital camera with wide angle lens (equivalent of 28mm on a film camera)...
A cheap good working way would be the
Canon A300 or A310 small 3.2mg camera with a very wide angle lens. Excellent for just web pages, and cheap too. "Doghouse Riley" wrote in message ... ... for shooting interiors (for real estate webpage) I know this can be done with a digital SLR, but would prefer not having to go to that expense. Are there any other options?? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a digital camera with wide angle lens (equivalent of 28mm on a film camera)...
Mark your suggestion argues with itself!
28mm is NOT wide enough for a large percentage of interior shots the Canon Digital Rebel with a 17-40mm f4 L is equal to a 28mm wide angle at 17mm "Mark M" wrote in message news:6jERc.26443$Oi.14559@fed1read04... "Doghouse Riley" wrote in message ... ... for shooting interiors (for real estate webpage) I know this can be done with a digital SLR, but would prefer not having to go to that expense. Are there any other options?? 28mm is NOT wide enough for a large percentage of interior shots. Also...If you want to create images for ads that really show off the size of the room...then the wider the better. If you change your mind about SOME additional expense, then I would recommend you consider spending about $1500. --This would get you the Canon Digital Rebel, and the excellent 17-40mm f4 L lens. This combination would be ideal for your needs in my opinion. It would also be worth purchasing the 420EX shoe-mounted flash. Built-in flash will simply not present interiors well. Bottom line: While it may be a slightly large outlay in the short term, the long term RESULTS of presenting high quality, appropriately wide angled shots that truly show off your properties will TRULY repay the cost many times. In the real estate shopping world, pictures are everything in terms of actually getting people to visit the property. Crummy pictures mean very short lists of visitors or potential buyers. Invest. You won't be sorry. Canon Digital Rebel: $799 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=297500&is=REG Canon 17-40 f4 L lens: $689 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=279582&is=USA Canon 420EX flash: $179 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...tails&Q=&sku=2 06436&is=USA Total cost (no flash): $1489.90 With flash: 1669.85 Mark M |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a digital camera with wide angle lens (equivalent of 28mm on a film camera)...
Mark your suggestion argues with itself!
28mm is NOT wide enough for a large percentage of interior shots the Canon Digital Rebel with a 17-40mm f4 L is equal to a 28mm wide angle at 17mm "Mark M" wrote in message news:6jERc.26443$Oi.14559@fed1read04... "Doghouse Riley" wrote in message ... ... for shooting interiors (for real estate webpage) I know this can be done with a digital SLR, but would prefer not having to go to that expense. Are there any other options?? 28mm is NOT wide enough for a large percentage of interior shots. Also...If you want to create images for ads that really show off the size of the room...then the wider the better. If you change your mind about SOME additional expense, then I would recommend you consider spending about $1500. --This would get you the Canon Digital Rebel, and the excellent 17-40mm f4 L lens. This combination would be ideal for your needs in my opinion. It would also be worth purchasing the 420EX shoe-mounted flash. Built-in flash will simply not present interiors well. Bottom line: While it may be a slightly large outlay in the short term, the long term RESULTS of presenting high quality, appropriately wide angled shots that truly show off your properties will TRULY repay the cost many times. In the real estate shopping world, pictures are everything in terms of actually getting people to visit the property. Crummy pictures mean very short lists of visitors or potential buyers. Invest. You won't be sorry. Canon Digital Rebel: $799 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=297500&is=REG Canon 17-40 f4 L lens: $689 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...=279582&is=USA Canon 420EX flash: $179 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...tails&Q=&sku=2 06436&is=USA Total cost (no flash): $1489.90 With flash: 1669.85 Mark M |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a digital camera with wide angle lens (equivalent of 28mm on a film camera)...
"YoYo" your.business.com wrote in news:10hemhkno4q8l68
@corp.supernews.com: A cheap good working way would be the Canon A300 or A310 small 3.2mg camera with a very wide angle lens. Excellent for just web pages, and cheap too. Those are 33 mm equivalent. Not so wide. No - for interiors for a real estate page you will need more than that. If you have time you could do some stitching, i.e. taking several picturs and combine them. Rather hard work for interiors though. Almost for free if you have the time. But time is money Now - real estate? Is that not very expensive in US? Would not a more expensive solution be well worth it? /Roland |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a digital camera with wide angle lens (equivalent of 28mm on a film camera)...
"YoYo" your.business.com wrote in news:10hemhkno4q8l68
@corp.supernews.com: A cheap good working way would be the Canon A300 or A310 small 3.2mg camera with a very wide angle lens. Excellent for just web pages, and cheap too. Those are 33 mm equivalent. Not so wide. No - for interiors for a real estate page you will need more than that. If you have time you could do some stitching, i.e. taking several picturs and combine them. Rather hard work for interiors though. Almost for free if you have the time. But time is money Now - real estate? Is that not very expensive in US? Would not a more expensive solution be well worth it? /Roland |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Looking for a digital camera with wide angle lens (equivalent of 28mm on a film camera)...
"Mark M" wrote in message news:6jERc.26443$Oi.14559@fed1read04... erm... first you say..... 28mm is NOT wide enough for a large percentage of interior shots. then you suggest... recommend you consider spending about $1500. --This would get you the Canon Digital Rebel, and the excellent 17-40mm f4 L lens. This combination would be ideal for your needs in my opinion. but the 17mm lens on the eos300d is equivalent to 27.2mm - very close to 28mm. I'd suggest a far cheaper alternative would be a Nikon 5400 (28mm), one of the little ricoh's (28mm), or even get pretty much any small digital with a wide angle adapter - saw a generic .45x wide adapter the other day which would take most digitals out to about 15mm. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark M" wrote in message news:6jERc.26443$Oi.14559@fed1read04... erm... first you say..... 28mm is NOT wide enough for a large percentage of interior shots. then you suggest... recommend you consider spending about $1500. --This would get you the Canon Digital Rebel, and the excellent 17-40mm f4 L lens. This combination would be ideal for your needs in my opinion. but the 17mm lens on the eos300d is equivalent to 27.2mm - very close to 28mm. I'd suggest a far cheaper alternative would be a Nikon 5400 (28mm), one of the little ricoh's (28mm), or even get pretty much any small digital with a wide angle adapter - saw a generic .45x wide adapter the other day which would take most digitals out to about 15mm. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another nail in the view camera coffin? | Robert Feinman | Large Format Photography Equipment | 108 | August 4th 04 03:37 PM |
Nikon D70 Standard Lens Versus 35-70 f2.8 Also wide angle question | Randall Smith | Digital Photography | 6 | July 5th 04 09:54 AM |
Will digital photography ever stabilize? | Alfred Molon | Digital Photography | 37 | June 30th 04 08:11 PM |
Wide Angle Lens vs Slim Camera | Steve Almond | Digital Photography | 2 | June 24th 04 09:47 AM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |