If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
End of an Era
Kennedy McEwen wrote:
In article , William Graham writes I am impressed, however with these formula I cars that can hit the rails at 175 MPH, fly end over end a dozen times, completely come apart at the seams until there is nothing left of them but the cage containing the driver, which, after he unbelts himself, he walks away from without a scratch....Why can't they do that with the family sedan? To an extent, most of them are designed to deform protectively in exactly the same way - hence the presence of crush zones etc. Of course, they won't withstand a 175MPH impact with all/any passengers surviving, but the suspension doesn't fall apart when they drive over a pothole either. Drivers and passengers of the average family sedan wouldn't accept being strapped into the harness by a 3 man team (drivers cannot tighten the harness enough by themselves), wearing a HANS brace or flameproof overalls every time they get into the vehicle either or being fit enough to withstand 10g differential forces on their neck muscles before being given a license every season. There have been many technologies that have transitioned from F1 to commercial cars, seat belts, anti-lock brakes, monocoque/unibody chassis to name a few, but ultimately they are different vehicle types with vastly differing requirements. One common aspect is that if you make the car capable of going fast enough, that is as fast as some people will drive it, and I personally don't want to see someone in my rear view mirror approaching at 175MPH while I am stuck at traffic lights on my way home from work. When driving on the Autobahns, it isn't all that unusual to be passed when going at speeds approaching 200mph! Those guys DRIVE. NOte that the drivers are MUCH more responsible there than in the US. A good integral rollbar would be of great aid in preventing deaths, as would a simplified full harness, rather than the airbag. |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
End of an Era
David J. Littleboy wrote:
"Kennedy McEwen" wrote: I personally don't want to see someone in my rear view mirror approaching at 175MPH while I am stuck at traffic lights on my way home from work. The easy way to avoid that is to not own a car. (That's one of the reasons I ended up in Tokyo.) Seriously, I don't understand why more people don't decide not to own cars. The (quite rational*) decision not to own a car ought to be a possibility, right? *: Cars are dangerous and expensive (at the least; breathing gasoline fumes can't be good for one). And one can buy a lot of camera equipment for the price of a car. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan That depends on where you are. New York City, Tokyo, London, yes. Beeville, Texas, or Allen, Tx, or Henderson, Nv. not feasible. |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
End of an Era
Philip Homburg wrote:
In article , David J. Littleboy wrote: *: Cars are dangerous and expensive (at the least; breathing gasoline fumes can't be good for one). And one can buy a lot of camera equipment for the price of a car. However, often a car is the most convenient way to get all that gear to where you need it. :-) Not everyone lives in a major city with adequate public transportation, or wants to. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
End of an Era
Roger wrote:
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 20:58:03 +0900, "David J. Littleboy" wrote: "Philip Homburg" wrote: David J. Littleboy wrote: *: Cars are dangerous and expensive (at the least; breathing gasoline fumes can't be good for one). And one can buy a lot of camera equipment for the price of a car. However, often a car is the most convenient way to get all that gear to where you need it. :-) It's not only convenient, here in the states with wide open spaces it's a necessity. Howeve I have found that for trips it is cheaper to rent a car than drive your own unless your car is paid for and has a lot of miles on it. Going from Michigan to Denver is cheaper to fly my own airplane compared to driving. Coach class commercial flights are cheaper yet and by far the cheapest was to rent a car. I can hire a cab for a day for many more days than I have days to go out shooting on the money I save not having a car. (Not that I've ever done that, since public transportation here is flipping amazing, but it's on my list of things to try for rural locations.) I could also legally rent a car, but that wouldn't be a good idea (I've never driven in Japan, and only drove for a year in the US and converted my US license to a Japanese one). David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com A commercial flight, booked months in advance can be much cheaper for a long trip, say Dallas to Toronto, than driving and staying in hotels, eating at restaurants. Unless one is fond of camping out, travel by car can cost a lot more than just wear and tear on the car and gasoline. I prefer to fly, and then drive a rented car, or more lately, just go on a cruise, and leave the driving to the captain. |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
End of an Era
Rebecca Ore wrote:
In article , "David J. Littleboy" wrote: Seriously, I don't understand why more people don't decide not to own cars. The (quite rational*) decision not to own a car ought to be a possibility, right? I live in Philadelphia for that reason -- public transportation. But I may end up leaving Philadelphia for a better job. The only places where Americans can afford not to have cars are small towns with viable downtowns and a handful of cities which have good enough public transportation. Some employers (Comcast in Philadelphia for one) have moved back into the cities (over a transportation interchange in Comcast's case); a lot are still out where the trans doesn't reach. The infrastructure of the US is auto-centric. It is freedom-centric. Most US residents just want to go where they want to go, WHEN they want to go and don't want to wait on a bus, cab, or subway. I find the whole idea of using public transportation VERY restrictive, and confining. |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
End of an Era
William Graham wrote:
"Laurence Payne" lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote in message ... On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:57:15 GMT, Rebecca Ore wrote: The infrastructure of the US is auto-centric. Yeah. It's going to come as an even bigger shock to you guys. But you'll cope, as we all will have to. Yes.....I don't see any real problems, myself......Getting rid of the gas-guzzlers might be a traumatic experience for some, but I'm sure there will be a number of other alternatives on the horizon. I see us as being individually transportation orientated, but not necessarily gasoline dependent as others seem to see us. When the gas runs out, we will just take to electric vehicles or whatever we have to do. But crowding together into busses or trains just isn't in the cards, and I just don't see that it should have to be. We don't think that way, and our life style isn't designed around that sort of thing. IOW, whatever they come up with, you can be sure of one thing.....One person will be able to leave his house in it, and drive it to wherever he wants to go without having to be dependent on anyone else in order to go there. Whether it burns alcohol, or peanut shells, or runs through storage batteries, or picks up energy from the road or whatever, it will be a one man, one destination at a time vehicle.....Of that, you can be sure....... I agree, but it is a lot more fun if two can go together... Grin. Technology WILL come through when the motivation reaches the necessary level. |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
End of an Era
Rebecca Ore wrote:
In article , Laurence Payne lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote: On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 13:57:15 GMT, Rebecca Ore wrote: The infrastructure of the US is auto-centric. Yeah. It's going to come as an even bigger shock to you guys. But you'll cope, as we all will have to. I'm moving to England if I can. Otherwise, I'm staying in Philadelphia, a wonderful place separated from Pittsburgh by Northern Alabama. I visited Philly, once. Got out of town as fast as my rented car would carry me, then avoided the city when I returned to the airport. How CAN you stand the smell? |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
End of an Era
Pudentame wrote:
Philip Homburg wrote: In article , Pudentame wrote: I currently have to be at work at 3:00am. It's just over 5 miles away, slightly more than an hour walking. The nearest grocery store is halfway to where I work. Ah, so all you need is a bicycle. :-) Yeah, so the limited number of busses there are in this town could run over me. Yeah, and bicycles are SO much fun when the temperature is -3F and the wind is blowing 30mph. Toss in a little snow, and it's REALLY a ball. |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
End of an Era
"Laurence Payne" lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote in message ... They do, to an extent. Crumple zones. No one invented crumple zones, they just started saving as much car as they could without having it collapse in on itself. Using no frame at all was a master stroke. These things are so weak they created the need for flat beds for towing. Try to jack one up and then close the doors. Bob Hickey |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
End of an Era
"Laurence Payne" lpayne1NOSPAM@dslDOTpipexDOTcom wrote Got a bicycle? *I* have, and even though I'm in my 50s and pretty knocked around with kidney failure I use it a lot. I live within 5 Km of a major city (close enough to be in a 2 hour parking area) and for most trips (hospital, shops, weekend jaunts) the old 'deadly treadly' is a better option than my car, since it is free and can be parked absolutely anywhere. Doesn't rain a lot here though, I'll admit, nor does it get freezing cold, which would prevent people in many places from using a bike. Sadly, many cities do not do enough to promote cycling or provide safe routes for commuters; when oil hits $10 a litre (and it will) they will have to... Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pelican swallows pigeon | Daniel Silevitch | Digital Photography | 31 | October 31st 06 05:04 PM |
Hoya HMC CP filter | Eydz | 35mm Photo Equipment | 2 | October 22nd 06 01:21 AM |
Hoya 67mm circular polarizer + Hoya Skylight + Nikon D70 - some problems | Nicolae Fieraru | Digital Photography | 16 | April 10th 05 11:10 AM |
Hoya 67mm circular polarizer + Hoya Skylight + Nikon D70 - some problems | Nicolae Fieraru | Digital Photography | 0 | April 9th 05 06:03 AM |
Hoya Filters UV(0) OR UV(N) | ianr | Digital Photography | 0 | January 27th 05 10:31 PM |