If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best format question
Hello. I am going to ask what is probably an incredibly basic question,
so please be gentle with me. I have been keen on photography all my life, from my first Kodak Box Brownie in 1952, through to my grand old SLR. Then I discovered digital, with which I am still very much a beginner. I have a liffle Fuji FinePix A340 that only saves in JPG. For about three years I have happily shot away and built up a collection in this format. Recently I discovered that this format is prone to progressive quality loss over successive saves. One or two of my images show this, as they have been extensively worked on. I just love fiddling with them on the computer. Trying to research this issue I came to the conclusion that TIF might be better for storage. Drive space is not an issue for me, so thre's plenty of room for them. The thing is, my camera only produces JPGs. I can't afford to replace it with one that has the TIF option. However I do have software that will batch convert image formats. So will it help if I get the JPG images off the camera and immediately convert them to TIF before doing anything else with them? Grateful thanks for any advice you can offer this old fella. -- Peter in New Zealand. (Pull the plug out to reply.) Collector of old cameras, tropical fish fancier, good coffee nutter, and compulsive computer fiddler. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Best format question
"Peter in New Zealand" wrote in message news:1190145524.566348@ftpsrv1... Hello. I am going to ask what is probably an incredibly basic question, so please be gentle with me. I have been keen on photography all my life, from my first Kodak Box Brownie in 1952, through to my grand old SLR. Then I discovered digital, with which I am still very much a beginner. I have a liffle Fuji FinePix A340 that only saves in JPG. For about three years I have happily shot away and built up a collection in this format. Recently I discovered that this format is prone to progressive quality loss over successive saves. One or two of my images show this, as they have been extensively worked on. I just love fiddling with them on the computer. Trying to research this issue I came to the conclusion that TIF might be better for storage. Drive space is not an issue for me, so thre's plenty of room for them. The thing is, my camera only produces JPGs. I can't afford to replace it with one that has the TIF option. However I do have software that will batch convert image formats. So will it help if I get the JPG images off the camera and immediately convert them to TIF before doing anything else with them? Grateful thanks for any advice you can offer this old fella. -- Peter in New Zealand. (Pull the plug out to reply.) Collector of old cameras, tropical fish fancier, good coffee nutter, and compulsive computer fiddler. Changing to any other format from jpeg is a totally pointless exercise until after you have made changes. If you take the files into your image editing tool and then once you make any changes saving as tiff would be fine, beter still would be to save in the native lossless format of your image tool if it has one. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Best format question
Pete D wrote:
"Peter in New Zealand" wrote in message news:1190145524.566348@ftpsrv1... Hello. I am going to ask what is probably an incredibly basic question, so please be gentle with me. I have been keen on photography all my life, from my first Kodak Box Brownie in 1952, through to my grand old SLR. Then I discovered digital, with which I am still very much a beginner. I have a liffle Fuji FinePix A340 that only saves in JPG. For about three years I have happily shot away and built up a collection in this format. Recently I discovered that this format is prone to progressive quality loss over successive saves. One or two of my images show this, as they have been extensively worked on. I just love fiddling with them on the computer. Trying to research this issue I came to the conclusion that TIF might be better for storage. Drive space is not an issue for me, so thre's plenty of room for them. The thing is, my camera only produces JPGs. I can't afford to replace it with one that has the TIF option. However I do have software that will batch convert image formats. So will it help if I get the JPG images off the camera and immediately convert them to TIF before doing anything else with them? Grateful thanks for any advice you can offer this old fella. -- Peter in New Zealand. (Pull the plug out to reply.) Collector of old cameras, tropical fish fancier, good coffee nutter, and compulsive computer fiddler. Changing to any other format from jpeg is a totally pointless exercise until after you have made changes. If you take the files into your image editing tool and then once you make any changes saving as tiff would be fine, beter still would be to save in the native lossless format of your image tool if it has one. Thank you for helping. My image editing software doesn't have its own "native" format, so would I be right in assuming that I should work with the images in the original jpg format, and then save them as tiff, especially if there is a chance that I may want to do further work with them at some time? Thanks for your patience with this beginner. -- Peter in New Zealand. (Pull the plug out to reply.) Collector of old cameras, tropical fish fancier, good coffee nutter, and compulsive computer fiddler. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Best format question
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Best format question
Greetings Peter,
When I want to work on my files, I always make a copy and save it for this purpose. The original is archived for later use so it never is effected by any changes I may make to it. The issue you have noted occurs when you save the file. When you save it over and over, many times, it can be seen later. So, you may want to work on a file until you are done then save it. If you want to work on it several different ways, do the edits you want then save that file before the varied edits of the last edit. This way you will reduce the effect of and quality loss (it actually is pretty small). Converting to a TIFF is, of course another way to save your files. I would try that method to see if it suits you. Good Luck with it, Peter, talk to you soon, Ron Baird Eastman Kodak Company "Peter in New Zealand" wrote in message news:1190145524.566348@ftpsrv1... Hello. I am going to ask what is probably an incredibly basic question, so please be gentle with me. I have been keen on photography all my life, from my first Kodak Box Brownie in 1952, through to my grand old SLR. Then I discovered digital, with which I am still very much a beginner. I have a liffle Fuji FinePix A340 that only saves in JPG. For about three years I have happily shot away and built up a collection in this format. Recently I discovered that this format is prone to progressive quality loss over successive saves. One or two of my images show this, as they have been extensively worked on. I just love fiddling with them on the computer. Trying to research this issue I came to the conclusion that TIF might be better for storage. Drive space is not an issue for me, so thre's plenty of room for them. The thing is, my camera only produces JPGs. I can't afford to replace it with one that has the TIF option. However I do have software that will batch convert image formats. So will it help if I get the JPG images off the camera and immediately convert them to TIF before doing anything else with them? Grateful thanks for any advice you can offer this old fella. -- Peter in New Zealand. (Pull the plug out to reply.) Collector of old cameras, tropical fish fancier, good coffee nutter, and compulsive computer fiddler. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Best format question
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:03:55 +1200, Peter in New Zealand wrote:
Hello. I am going to ask what is probably an incredibly basic question, so please be gentle with me. I have been keen on photography all my life, from my first Kodak Box Brownie in 1952, through to my grand old SLR. Then I discovered digital, with which I am still very much a beginner. I have a liffle Fuji FinePix A340 that only saves in JPG. For about three years I have happily shot away and built up a collection in this format. Recently I discovered that this format is prone to progressive quality loss over successive saves. One or two of my images show this, as they have been extensively worked on. I just love fiddling with them on the computer. Trying to research this issue I came to the conclusion that TIF might be better for storage. Drive space is not an issue for me, so thre's plenty of room for them. The thing is, my camera only produces JPGs. I can't afford to replace it with one that has the TIF option. However I do have software that will batch convert image formats. So will it help if I get the JPG images off the camera and immediately convert them to TIF before doing anything else with them? Sure that will help. So will always doing editing from a system copy of the original. BTW - one fairly inexpensive way to get a camera that shoots raw is the Kodak online store - look for a refurb P series. Got my P850 last fall for $250 including the printer dock. Grateful thanks for any advice you can offer this old fella. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Best format question
ray wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:03:55 +1200, Peter in New Zealand wrote: Hello. I am going to ask what is probably an incredibly basic question, so please be gentle with me. I have been keen on photography all my life, from my first Kodak Box Brownie in 1952, through to my grand old SLR. Then I discovered digital, with which I am still very much a beginner. I have a liffle Fuji FinePix A340 that only saves in JPG. For about three years I have happily shot away and built up a collection in this format. Recently I discovered that this format is prone to progressive quality loss over successive saves. One or two of my images show this, as they have been extensively worked on. I just love fiddling with them on the computer. Trying to research this issue I came to the conclusion that TIF might be better for storage. Drive space is not an issue for me, so thre's plenty of room for them. The thing is, my camera only produces JPGs. I can't afford to replace it with one that has the TIF option. However I do have software that will batch convert image formats. So will it help if I get the JPG images off the camera and immediately convert them to TIF before doing anything else with them? Sure that will help. So will always doing editing from a system copy of the original. BTW - one fairly inexpensive way to get a camera that shoots raw is the Kodak online store - look for a refurb P series. Got my P850 last fall for $250 including the printer dock. Grateful thanks for any advice you can offer this old fella. Thanks heaps to you all for taking the time and trouble to offer your thoughts. As an old film photographer I kind of "identify" with the idea of the original jpgs being kept untouched as the "negatives". The software I use very easily bulk converts to tif, leaving the originals untouched. In this forum of obviously knowledgable people I hesitate to mention it, but it is Ashampoo Photo Commander 5, and for anything it can't do for me, (which isn't often), I fall back onto an old version of Photo Studio. I have been a bit overwhelmed with all the issues of file format, digital zoom versus optical zoom (I know digital zoom is not always good). I appreciate the courtesy and friendly help offered here (a refreshing change after the odd group I have been in over the past ten years), and I will continue to lurk. I am sure I will pick up valuable tips and ideas from the posters. Thank you all again. -- Peter in New Zealand. (Pull the plug out to reply.) Collector of old cameras, tropical fish fancier, good coffee nutter, and compulsive computer fiddler. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Best format question
On Sep 18, 4:03 pm, Peter in New Zealand
wrote: Hello. I am going to ask what is probably an incredibly basic question, so please be gentle with me. I have been keen on photography all my life, from my first Kodak Box Brownie in 1952, through to my grand old SLR. Then I discovered digital, with which I am still very much a beginner. I have a liffle Fuji FinePix A340 that only saves in JPG. For about three years I have happily shot away and built up a collection in this format. Recently I discovered that this format is prone to progressive quality loss over successive saves. One or two of my images show this, as they have been extensively worked on. I just love fiddling with them on the computer. Trying to research this issue I came to the conclusion that TIF might be better for storage. Drive space is not an issue for me, so thre's plenty of room for them. The thing is, my camera only produces JPGs. I can't afford to replace it with one that has the TIF option. However I do have software that will batch convert image formats. So will it help if I get the JPG images off the camera and immediately convert them to TIF before doing anything else with them? Grateful thanks for any advice you can offer this old fella. -- Peter in New Zealand. (Pull the plug out to reply.) Collector of old cameras, tropical fish fancier, good coffee nutter, and compulsive computer fiddler. Don't worry too much about the jpg format. Lots and lots of professionals use it and it is the universal format for getting something professionally printed. Here are a few suggestions and thoughts. First, set your quality to maximum in your software so you don't keep recompressing everything. 2, keep your originals separate from your working files -- that's standard no matter what workflow you're using. C, stop taking pictures upside down just because your one the wrong side of the globe ;-) iv, you should be able to pick up a photo editor like Gimp for next to nothing (okay, Gimp IS nothing) and use that. Then store in Gimp's format. Photoshop Elements is also reasonable, about US$90. Just because you open something, say for printing, doesn't mean you have to save it again if you haven't made any changes. With RAW, disk space does become an issue. I've shot about 3,400 pictures in the last month and will shot that many more in the next month. Yes, disk space becomes an issue. Time also becomes an issue. Yes, in many ways RAW is better, but it isn't a cure-all and it comes with a price. But jpg isn't perfect either and that, too, comes with a price. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Best format question
On Sep 18, 9:46 pm, Peter in New Zealand
wrote: Pete D wrote: "Peter in New Zealand" wrote in message news:1190145524.566348@ftpsrv1... Hello. I am going to ask what is probably an incredibly basic question, so please be gentle with me. I have been keen on photography all my life, from my first Kodak Box Brownie in 1952, through to my grand old SLR. Then I discovered digital, with which I am still very much a beginner. I have a liffle Fuji FinePix A340 that only saves in JPG. For about three years I have happily shot away and built up a collection in this format. Recently I discovered that this format is prone to progressive quality loss over successive saves. One or two of my images show this, as they have been extensively worked on. I just love fiddling with them on the computer. Never save back on top of your original file and you can't go wrong. Trying to research this issue I came to the conclusion that TIF might be better for storage. Drive space is not an issue for me, so thre's plenty of room for them. The thing is, my camera only produces JPGs. I can't afford to replace it with one that has the TIF option. However I do have software that will batch convert image formats. So will it help if I get the JPG images off the camera and immediately convert them to TIF before doing anything else with them? Grateful thanks for any advice you can offer this old fella. -- Peter in New Zealand. (Pull the plug out to reply.) Collector of old cameras, tropical fish fancier, good coffee nutter, and compulsive computer fiddler. Changing to any other format from jpeg is a totally pointless exercise until after you have made changes. If you take the files into your image editing tool and then once you make any changes saving as tiff would be fine, beter still would be to save in the native lossless format of your image tool if it has one. Thank you for helping. My image editing software doesn't have its own "native" format, so would I be right in assuming that I should work with the images in the original jpg format, and then save them as tiff, especially if there is a chance that I may want to do further work with them at some time? Thanks for your patience with this beginner. Yes. That is a sensible way to procede. There is nothing at much wrong with high quality JPEG image files as long as you do not repeatedly open them make a global change and resave as JPEG. You should treat the original JPEG images that come off the camera like you would film negatives. Only ever work on a copy and never save back on top of the original image. It is pointless batch converting JPEGs into TIFFs for the sake of it. All the information that is available about the image is inside the JPEG file and converting to a TIFF just crystallises any systematic errors present in the particular JPEG decoder you used and requires between 6 and 20x more disk space to no useful purpose. Regards, Martin Brown |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Best format question
On 18 Sep, 21:03, Peter in New Zealand
wrote: Hello. I am going to ask what is probably an incredibly basic question, so please be gentle with me. I have been keen on photography all my life, from my first Kodak Box Brownie in 1952, through to my grand old SLR. Then I discovered digital, with which I am still very much a beginner. I have a liffle Fuji FinePix A340 that only saves in JPG. For about three years I have happily shot away and built up a collection in this format. Recently I discovered that this format is prone to progressive quality loss over successive saves. One or two of my images show this, as they have been extensively worked on. I just love fiddling with them on the computer. Trying to research this issue I came to the conclusion that TIF might be better for storage. Drive space is not an issue for me, so thre's plenty of room for them. The thing is, my camera only produces JPGs. I can't afford to replace it with one that has the TIF option. However I do have software that will batch convert image formats. So will it help if I get the JPG images off the camera and immediately convert them to TIF before doing anything else with them? Grateful thanks for any advice you can offer this old fella. -- Peter in New Zealand. (Pull the plug out to reply.) Collector of old cameras, tropical fish fancier, good coffee nutter, and compulsive computer fiddler. After making a few mistakes and losing or ruining some nice photos, I learnt this habit: immediately after downloading the photos from the camera, burn them to a CD or DVD. I don't even do the simplest selection or editing, not even deleted obviously totally duff photos, blank discs are quite cheap and the saving is not worth the danger of deleting the wrong photo. Actually, I do one step before burning the disc: since I shoot raw on my Canon 300D, I do a batch convert to JPG with default settings. These JPGs are saved to the disc together with the raw. This makes it easier to review the disc later and makes it usable to people who can't or won't use the raw images. Only once this disc is made and stored in my backup cupboard do I start the real processing. Once I have finished will all editing, I usually delete the raw files since they are so big but if I change my mind, I can go back to the backup disc and start again rather than continue editing on the JPG. -- Seán Ó Leathlóbhair |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
medium format question (reposted) | Tom Thackrey | Medium Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | December 10th 06 04:13 AM |
Medium format to digital resolution question.... | Snapshotsid | Digital Photography | 18 | January 29th 05 10:12 PM |
Secure digital format question... | Ray Lavelle | Digital Photography | 2 | December 15th 04 11:13 PM |
Secure digital format question... | Andy Turner | Digital Photography | 5 | December 3rd 04 02:20 PM |
Medium Format Movie Question | jjs | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 4 | October 17th 04 10:02 PM |