If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Amateur Sport Photo Competition with prize
I am neither a plagarist or a liar. You, however seem to be being
deliberately stupid. The site is a magazine site. The articles are FREE. End of story. I write articles that seem to make sense to me, or that others have asked me to write (not companies, readers). You don't have to like my choice of article subject all the time. So what. You pick on the HP/Epson article. I had them both here at the same time. That is all. I was printing the same images on both and could not resist the comparison. So what? What I do know is that people do find many of the articles useful, from both posts and offlist emails. I also know some people don't like them. That's fine too. Anyone who reads your post and mine will see that you have now switched to attacking new things and addressed nothing I said, as if you never really read what I said. So I see no point in continuing this with you. Wayne Wayne J. Cosshall Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/ Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/ Photography and Art Forums http://www.dimagemaker.com/forums/index.php Personal art site http://www.cosshall.com/ D_Mac wrote: On Aug 23, 9:55 am, "Wayne J. Cosshall" wrote: Do you enjoy being a moron or what, because little in your statements are true? Press releases are sent out so people will publish them. End of story. It is in the PR companies' interests for this to happen. I plagarise nothing. I put press releases up for those who are interested and label them as such, so they know it is straight from the companies' PR agency. I write original content as well, as that is not labelled as such. I only post press release announcements when I seem to have got it before others and for products that seem particularly interesting. Lots of other press releases go up on my site unannounced. I earn absolutely nothing from people visiting the site, as such. So you can go read articles, download RAW files, whatever and I earn nothing. If someone clicks on a Google ad then yes I do, but no one has to, and it ONLY happens if someone actually clicks on an ad. If someone buys off of Amazon from following one of my ads, I earn. The small ads on the home page are the same, only a commission if someone buys from it. That is it. You can use the site all you want and I earn NOTHING. Before you make supid statements learn the truth. I only post article announcements on relevant lists. By Annika's definition that makes me a shill for my own site. I don't spam lists with announcements that are not relevant, nor am I promoting something you have to pay for. It is all for free if you want. Personally I think I behave far more morally and fairly than those who like to bag and get stuck into someone who actually does something. It is really easy to just waggle your mouth or tap away on a keyboard rather than actually contribute something that is, at least to many people, a useful site that is free to use. Do I want people to go to my site? Of course I do. Do I wish I got enough activity on the ads to actually pay for the time I put into it? Sure I do. I am neither a communist nor independently wealthy. If DIMi was done purely as a business I would have shut it down long ago. I do not believe it is possible to win on the net. I've had people tell me I should have no ads at all and make my money off of running workshops. I've had the moderator of the Yahoo Olympus list tell me I can't post about my competitions because it will confuse his members (he runs a no prize competition each month) and that I am commercial because of the google ads on my site, yet his site which he points to on the list also has google ads. I get labelled a spammer yet what I post is relevant and free. There is so much that everyone skips over on lists (unless all you do is read and write and never shoot photos) yet some people seem unable to do that with my lists. If people have a philosophical view that the usenet is only for free stuff then fine. The stuff on my site is free. Completely. There are no fees to enter competitions, there was no fee to enter the World of Photography physical exhibition I mounted last year and there is no fee to read the articles on the site, mine or press releases. So what free use rule have I violated? I have gone out and organised prizes for competitions people on the list have emailed me asking for. Similarly I have gone a reviewed stuff when asked. I even spent a week researching and then setting up some appropriate forums so people could post pics in with their posts to get direct feedback on art. I must be incredibly stupid because I just don't get it. Annika, sorry, but your comment came after a number of other attacks, both on and off list, and I had had enough. You copped it (don't know if that phrase translates into American). Now off to do more unpaid work - 40x reviews, a whole bunch of software reviews, and get the macro competition online. Cheers, Wayne Some sheep eat grass. Some find eternal life in clothes... Others just get eaten! Wayne has been making money from plagiarizing "news" articles from photographic equipment vendors via his web site for a couple of years now. I think it's only fair someone ought to question his motives for doing it. No Journalist - Ex or otherwise has any right - ethical or moral - to use a newsgroup for profit without getting flak from those who want it kept free of commercial interests. Every click to his site produces advertising he gets paid to put in your face. If Wayne posted a link to the "News item," he plagiarizes from the original web site, he wouldn't make any money. As it is, he really needs to put his house in order before he starts calling his "customers" idiots. That's all he's about, making money from "click through" advertising. He's gotten away with for long enough. How he's done it, is an amazing feat of deception in the first place. By absolute definition, he is spamming the newsgroups. I'm sure a complaint to his ISP, listing his plethora of newsgroup spam - all pointing to plagiarized posts, he'd pretty soon have no Internet access and his site's perceived "popularity" would revert back to the zero- rating it deserves. Doug Well Wayne... I'm calling your a plagiarist and a liar. Your site is full of other people's writings and it's a 100% commercial site that contains some information you promote as being free. Your rendition of it being a free information site is an absolute lie. Not only that but you thumb your nose at every convention related to Usenet. Convention has it that a 3 line sig is a courtesy. Four line sig's go mostly un-noticed too but yours? FIVE LINES ...all of them advertising your site AND... You're a bloody top poster to boot!. http://www.dimagemaker.com/store.php Tell me this where I get all the *FREE* stuff your site is all about. You are actively selling cameras and books from a shopping cart on it. You simply can't get any more commercial than that mate yet you would have us all believe you're doing it all out of the goodness of your heart. My site is free too. http://www.brisbaneweddingphotographers.com Anyone is free to visit and it doesn't cost them a cent. I have this site so I can sell my photography packages but unlike you, I don't come up with a load of bull**** about the site not being commercial just because I give out some *FREE* information too. Tell me again now Wayne, how self righteous you are with your generous slaving away for the good of humanity, with your *FREE* to use web site. Tell me how you don't cut and paste information from manufacturer's in creating your excuse for camera "tests" and I'll post the links to 6 articles you plagiarized the content for. I took you to task a few months ago for the subterfuge you tried to pass off as a legitimate printer comparison. Trying to compare a full blown $6000 ++ commercial printer to a $2500 desktop model from a different maker. What was that about? Did you get a free HP printer and decided to heap **** on Epson's consumer printer because they wouldn't give you one or what? Not only did you try to make out you were a credible tester but when it came to comparing the output, you had no method or equipment to measure it with! Was that a press release too? Your bull**** now, in trying to pass yourself of as providing a *free* service for people is laughable in the extreme. You jokers hosting Photo competitions to get people to your site are the real idiots. Convince some supplier into providing a prize with the promise of publicity and then you can't be bothered seeing it through to the judging. How pathetic is it then to claim you're busy doing yet more free work which somehow became more important than the original free work of getting photographers to come to your site? Murderer's and child molesters who admit they are just that, have more credibility that someone who trys to make out they are doing a free service for the community but direct you to a commercial web site full of ads and links to your own on-line store. Then you've got the gall to call someone who questions you an idiot. Looked in the mirror lately mate? Doug. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Amateur Sport Photo Competition with prize
Re the comment about my signature, I have never intended to cause
offense with this and I've been using the usenet for a very long time and have no idea of such 'rules' but I have changed my signature. It seemed the only think in your rant that made any sense. I make no apology for top posting. I makes more sense to me. Wayne Wayne J. Cosshall Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/ Personal art site http://www.cosshall.com/ Wayne J. Cosshall wrote: I am neither a plagarist or a liar. You, however seem to be being deliberately stupid. The site is a magazine site. The articles are FREE. End of story. I write articles that seem to make sense to me, or that others have asked me to write (not companies, readers). You don't have to like my choice of article subject all the time. So what. You pick on the HP/Epson article. I had them both here at the same time. That is all. I was printing the same images on both and could not resist the comparison. So what? What I do know is that people do find many of the articles useful, from both posts and offlist emails. I also know some people don't like them. That's fine too. Anyone who reads your post and mine will see that you have now switched to attacking new things and addressed nothing I said, as if you never really read what I said. So I see no point in continuing this with you. Wayne Wayne J. Cosshall Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/ Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/ Photography and Art Forums http://www.dimagemaker.com/forums/index.php Personal art site http://www.cosshall.com/ D_Mac wrote: On Aug 23, 9:55 am, "Wayne J. Cosshall" wrote: Do you enjoy being a moron or what, because little in your statements are true? Press releases are sent out so people will publish them. End of story. It is in the PR companies' interests for this to happen. I plagarise nothing. I put press releases up for those who are interested and label them as such, so they know it is straight from the companies' PR agency. I write original content as well, as that is not labelled as such. I only post press release announcements when I seem to have got it before others and for products that seem particularly interesting. Lots of other press releases go up on my site unannounced. I earn absolutely nothing from people visiting the site, as such. So you can go read articles, download RAW files, whatever and I earn nothing. If someone clicks on a Google ad then yes I do, but no one has to, and it ONLY happens if someone actually clicks on an ad. If someone buys off of Amazon from following one of my ads, I earn. The small ads on the home page are the same, only a commission if someone buys from it. That is it. You can use the site all you want and I earn NOTHING. Before you make supid statements learn the truth. I only post article announcements on relevant lists. By Annika's definition that makes me a shill for my own site. I don't spam lists with announcements that are not relevant, nor am I promoting something you have to pay for. It is all for free if you want. Personally I think I behave far more morally and fairly than those who like to bag and get stuck into someone who actually does something. It is really easy to just waggle your mouth or tap away on a keyboard rather than actually contribute something that is, at least to many people, a useful site that is free to use. Do I want people to go to my site? Of course I do. Do I wish I got enough activity on the ads to actually pay for the time I put into it? Sure I do. I am neither a communist nor independently wealthy. If DIMi was done purely as a business I would have shut it down long ago. I do not believe it is possible to win on the net. I've had people tell me I should have no ads at all and make my money off of running workshops. I've had the moderator of the Yahoo Olympus list tell me I can't post about my competitions because it will confuse his members (he runs a no prize competition each month) and that I am commercial because of the google ads on my site, yet his site which he points to on the list also has google ads. I get labelled a spammer yet what I post is relevant and free. There is so much that everyone skips over on lists (unless all you do is read and write and never shoot photos) yet some people seem unable to do that with my lists. If people have a philosophical view that the usenet is only for free stuff then fine. The stuff on my site is free. Completely. There are no fees to enter competitions, there was no fee to enter the World of Photography physical exhibition I mounted last year and there is no fee to read the articles on the site, mine or press releases. So what free use rule have I violated? I have gone out and organised prizes for competitions people on the list have emailed me asking for. Similarly I have gone a reviewed stuff when asked. I even spent a week researching and then setting up some appropriate forums so people could post pics in with their posts to get direct feedback on art. I must be incredibly stupid because I just don't get it. Annika, sorry, but your comment came after a number of other attacks, both on and off list, and I had had enough. You copped it (don't know if that phrase translates into American). Now off to do more unpaid work - 40x reviews, a whole bunch of software reviews, and get the macro competition online. Cheers, Wayne Some sheep eat grass. Some find eternal life in clothes... Others just get eaten! Wayne has been making money from plagiarizing "news" articles from photographic equipment vendors via his web site for a couple of years now. I think it's only fair someone ought to question his motives for doing it. No Journalist - Ex or otherwise has any right - ethical or moral - to use a newsgroup for profit without getting flak from those who want it kept free of commercial interests. Every click to his site produces advertising he gets paid to put in your face. If Wayne posted a link to the "News item," he plagiarizes from the original web site, he wouldn't make any money. As it is, he really needs to put his house in order before he starts calling his "customers" idiots. That's all he's about, making money from "click through" advertising. He's gotten away with for long enough. How he's done it, is an amazing feat of deception in the first place. By absolute definition, he is spamming the newsgroups. I'm sure a complaint to his ISP, listing his plethora of newsgroup spam - all pointing to plagiarized posts, he'd pretty soon have no Internet access and his site's perceived "popularity" would revert back to the zero- rating it deserves. Doug Well Wayne... I'm calling your a plagiarist and a liar. Your site is full of other people's writings and it's a 100% commercial site that contains some information you promote as being free. Your rendition of it being a free information site is an absolute lie. Not only that but you thumb your nose at every convention related to Usenet. Convention has it that a 3 line sig is a courtesy. Four line sig's go mostly un-noticed too but yours? FIVE LINES ...all of them advertising your site AND... You're a bloody top poster to boot!. http://www.dimagemaker.com/store.php Tell me this where I get all the *FREE* stuff your site is all about. You are actively selling cameras and books from a shopping cart on it. You simply can't get any more commercial than that mate yet you would have us all believe you're doing it all out of the goodness of your heart. My site is free too. http://www.brisbaneweddingphotographers.com Anyone is free to visit and it doesn't cost them a cent. I have this site so I can sell my photography packages but unlike you, I don't come up with a load of bull**** about the site not being commercial just because I give out some *FREE* information too. Tell me again now Wayne, how self righteous you are with your generous slaving away for the good of humanity, with your *FREE* to use web site. Tell me how you don't cut and paste information from manufacturer's in creating your excuse for camera "tests" and I'll post the links to 6 articles you plagiarized the content for. I took you to task a few months ago for the subterfuge you tried to pass off as a legitimate printer comparison. Trying to compare a full blown $6000 ++ commercial printer to a $2500 desktop model from a different maker. What was that about? Did you get a free HP printer and decided to heap **** on Epson's consumer printer because they wouldn't give you one or what? Not only did you try to make out you were a credible tester but when it came to comparing the output, you had no method or equipment to measure it with! Was that a press release too? Your bull**** now, in trying to pass yourself of as providing a *free* service for people is laughable in the extreme. You jokers hosting Photo competitions to get people to your site are the real idiots. Convince some supplier into providing a prize with the promise of publicity and then you can't be bothered seeing it through to the judging. How pathetic is it then to claim you're busy doing yet more free work which somehow became more important than the original free work of getting photographers to come to your site? Murderer's and child molesters who admit they are just that, have more credibility that someone who trys to make out they are doing a free service for the community but direct you to a commercial web site full of ads and links to your own on-line store. Then you've got the gall to call someone who questions you an idiot. Looked in the mirror lately mate? Doug. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Amateur Sport Photo Competition with prize
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:21:55 +1000, Wayne J. Cosshall wrote:
Re the comment about my signature, I have never intended to cause offense with this and I've been using the usenet for a very long time and have no idea of such 'rules' but I have changed my signature. It seemed the only think in your rant that made any sense. I make no apology for top posting. I makes more sense to me. Wayne Wayne J. Cosshall Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker, http://www.dimagemaker.com/ Personal art site http://www.cosshall.com/ Doug's idiotic comment about too many signature lines is a couple of decades too late. I once agreed, and it made much sense when modems operated at 110 and 300 baud. When I got my first "high speed" 2400b USR modem, concern about long signatures faded. Doug's was the first reply to exceed 100 lines and that one as well as his next 152 line rant could have been immeasurably improved had they been truncated to zero lines. If anything, your "shill" messages are too brief, where they resemble chapter titles. Turning them into short "Press Release" type paragraphs might encourage more people to follow the links to the articles. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Amateur Sport Photo Competition with prize
On Aug 23, 4:21 pm, "Wayne J. Cosshall" wrote:
Re the comment about my signature, I have never intended to cause offense with this and I've been using the usenet for a very long time and have no idea of such 'rules' but I have changed my signature. It seemed the only think in your rant that made any sense. I make no apology for top posting. I makes more sense to me. Wayne Wayne J. Cosshall Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker,http://www.dimagemaker.com/ Personal art sitehttp://www.cosshall.com/ Wayne J. Cosshall wrote: I am neither a plagarist or a liar. You, however seem to be being deliberately stupid. The site is a magazine site. The articles are FREE. End of story. I write articles that seem to make sense to me, or that others have asked me to write (not companies, readers). You don't have to like my choice of article subject all the time. So what. You pick on the HP/Epson article. I had them both here at the same time. That is all. I was printing the same images on both and could not resist the comparison. So what? What I do know is that people do find many of the articles useful, from both posts and offlist emails. I also know some people don't like them. That's fine too. Anyone who reads your post and mine will see that you have now switched to attacking new things and addressed nothing I said, as if you never really read what I said. So I see no point in continuing this with you. Wayne Wayne J. Cosshall Publisher, The Digital ImageMaker,http://www.dimagemaker.com/ Blog http://www.digitalimagemakerworld.com/ Photography and Art Forumshttp://www.dimagemaker.com/forums/index.php Personal art sitehttp://www.cosshall.com/ D_Mac wrote: On Aug 23, 9:55 am, "Wayne J. Cosshall" wrote: Do you enjoy being a moron or what, because little in your statements are true? Press releases are sent out so people will publish them. End of story. It is in the PR companies' interests for this to happen. I plagarise nothing. I put press releases up for those who are interested and label them as such, so they know it is straight from the companies' PR agency. I write original content as well, as that is not labelled as such. I only post press release announcements when I seem to have got it before others and for products that seem particularly interesting. Lots of other press releases go up on my site unannounced. I earn absolutely nothing from people visiting the site, as such. So you can go read articles, download RAW files, whatever and I earn nothing. If someone clicks on a Google ad then yes I do, but no one has to, and it ONLY happens if someone actually clicks on an ad. If someone buys off of Amazon from following one of my ads, I earn. The small ads on the home page are the same, only a commission if someone buys from it. That is it. You can use the site all you want and I earn NOTHING. Before you make supid statements learn the truth. I only post article announcements on relevant lists. By Annika's definition that makes me a shill for my own site. I don't spam lists with announcements that are not relevant, nor am I promoting something you have to pay for. It is all for free if you want. Personally I think I behave far more morally and fairly than those who like to bag and get stuck into someone who actually does something. It is really easy to just waggle your mouth or tap away on a keyboard rather than actually contribute something that is, at least to many people, a useful site that is free to use. Do I want people to go to my site? Of course I do. Do I wish I got enough activity on the ads to actually pay for the time I put into it? Sure I do. I am neither a communist nor independently wealthy. If DIMi was done purely as a business I would have shut it down long ago. I do not believe it is possible to win on the net. I've had people tell me I should have no ads at all and make my money off of running workshops. I've had the moderator of the Yahoo Olympus list tell me I can't post about my competitions because it will confuse his members (he runs a no prize competition each month) and that I am commercial because of the google ads on my site, yet his site which he points to on the list also has google ads. I get labelled a spammer yet what I post is relevant and free. There is so much that everyone skips over on lists (unless all you do is read and write and never shoot photos) yet some people seem unable to do that with my lists. If people have a philosophical view that the usenet is only for free stuff then fine. The stuff on my site is free. Completely. There are no fees to enter competitions, there was no fee to enter the World of Photography physical exhibition I mounted last year and there is no fee to read the articles on the site, mine or press releases. So what free use rule have I violated? I have gone out and organised prizes for competitions people on the list have emailed me asking for. Similarly I have gone a reviewed stuff when asked. I even spent a week researching and then setting up some appropriate forums so people could post pics in with their posts to get direct feedback on art. I must be incredibly stupid because I just don't get it. Annika, sorry, but your comment came after a number of other attacks, both on and off list, and I had had enough. You copped it (don't know if that phrase translates into American). Now off to do more unpaid work - 40x reviews, a whole bunch of software reviews, and get the macro competition online. Cheers, Wayne Some sheep eat grass. Some find eternal life in clothes... Others just get eaten! Wayne has been making money from plagiarizing "news" articles from photographic equipment vendors via his web site for a couple of years now. I think it's only fair someone ought to question his motives for doing it. No Journalist - Ex or otherwise has any right - ethical or moral - to use a newsgroup for profit without getting flak from those who want it kept free of commercial interests. Every click to his site produces advertising he gets paid to put in your face. If Wayne posted a link to the "News item," he plagiarizes from the original web site, he wouldn't make any money. As it is, he really needs to put his house in order before he starts calling his "customers" idiots. That's all he's about, making money from "click through" advertising. He's gotten away with for long enough. How he's done it, is an amazing feat of deception in the first place. By absolute definition, he is spamming the newsgroups. I'm sure a complaint to his ISP, listing his plethora of newsgroup spam - all pointing to plagiarized posts, he'd pretty soon have no Internet access and his site's perceived "popularity" would revert back to the zero- rating it deserves. Doug Well Wayne... I'm calling your a plagiarist and a liar. Your site is full of other people's writings and it's a 100% commercial site that contains some information you promote as being free. Your rendition of it being a free information site is an absolute lie. Not only that but you thumb your nose at every convention related to Usenet. Convention has it that a 3 line sig is a courtesy. Four line sig's go mostly un-noticed too but yours? FIVE LINES ...all of them advertising your site AND... You're a bloody top poster to boot!. http://www.dimagemaker.com/store.php Tell me this where I get all the *FREE* stuff your site is all about. You are actively selling cameras and books from a shopping cart on it. You simply can't get any more commercial than that mate yet you would have us all believe you're doing it all out of the goodness of your heart. My site is free too. http://www.brisbaneweddingphotographers.comAnyone is free to visit and it doesn't cost them a cent. I have this site so I can sell my photography packages but unlike you, I don't come up with a load of bull**** about the site not being commercial just because I give out some *FREE* information too. Tell me again now Wayne, how self righteous you are with your generous slaving away for the good of humanity, with your *FREE* to use web site. Tell me how you don't cut and paste information from manufacturer's in creating your excuse for camera "tests" and I'll post the links to 6 articles you plagiarized the content for. I took you to task a few months ago for the subterfuge you tried to pass off as a legitimate printer comparison. Trying to compare a full blown $6000 ++ commercial printer to a $2500 desktop model from a different maker. What was that about? Did you get a free HP printer and decided to heap **** on Epson's consumer printer because they wouldn't give you one or what? Not only did you try to make out you were a credible tester but when it came to comparing the output, you had no method or equipment to measure it with! Was that a press release too? Your bull**** now, in trying to pass yourself of as providing a *free* service for people is laughable in the extreme. You jokers hosting Photo competitions to get people to your site are the real idiots. Convince some supplier into providing a prize with the promise of publicity and then you can't be bothered seeing it through to the judging. How pathetic is it then to claim you're busy doing yet more free work which somehow became more important than the original free work of getting photographers to come to your site? Murderer's and child molesters who admit they are just that, have more credibility that someone who trys ... read more » Only a bigoted idiot would attempt to reinvent the wheel and claim it was not a wheel. A magazine is a periodical publication containing a variety of articles, generally financed by advertising, purchased by readers, or both. For web sites that represent an existing print magazine, the web site is ordinarily referred to as "publication title Online", whereas an online only magazine should be titled "publication title Online Magazine". Your on-line store at: dimagemaker is called What? "DiMi Store" perhaps? Having a web site with a name saying it *SUPPLIES* "image, art and photography needs" is enough evidence it is intended to be a commercial site for which you are advertising -SPAMMING - newsgroups with links to that web site. What's that site called? titleDigital ImageMaker, for all your image, art and photography needs/title Before you keep up the tactic of insulting those who are offended by your lies and and scam competitions by calling them idiots and morons, read the terms and conditions of access you agreed to when you signed up with Optus. I'll make it partly easy for you "Mr Moron". Section seven of the acceptable use policy. ELECTRONIC MESSAGING AND SPAM (a) You must not use the service to spam, send bulk and/or unsolicited messages. This includes, but is not limited to commercial advertising, informational announcements, charity requests, petitions for signatures, chain letters and political or religious messages. You must only send such a message to those individuals who have explicitly requested it. In case you are unaware of the SPAM ACT, this includes forums and newsgroups which specifically prohibit commercial advertising in their charter. Although Aus.Photo has no charter as such and it's the only group you could legally post your spam too, you couldn't leave it there, could you? From my count, you've breached Optus's policy and ignored the laws relating to the spam act on at least 109 instances in other groups and maybe 10 in this group. It goes like this Mr. Moron... If you want to play in the big boy's sand pit, you better bring your own spade and bucket. Right up to the point you started calling those you rely on for your's site's intended audience "Idiots and Morons" you got away with it. Now you are shilling for your scam "photography competitions" and flaunting good graces with off hand comments about being too busy to see them through to the end, you have my attention. Keep it up and you'll have the Minister for Telecommunications' and Optus' management's attention too. Far too many Australians think the only time anything is illegal is when they get caught doing it. Well Wayne, you just got caught doing it too. If you don't stop right now and start behaving like a responsible business person, my next messages will be all complaints about your activities. Having your site hosted in the UK is not going to exempt you from Australia's laws. The choice is yours mate. Keep on with the attitude I'm an Idiot and a Moron at your own peril. Step up to the plate and show some responsibility instead of trying to tell people how responsible you are whilst showing you are not. Doug |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Amateur Sport Photo Competition with prize
On Aug 23, 8:42 pm, D_Mac wrote:
Before you keep up the tactic of insulting those who are offended by your lies and and scam competitions by calling them idiots and morons, read the terms and conditions of access you agreed to when you signed up with Optus. I'll make it partly easy for you "Mr Moron". Section seven of the acceptable use policy. Well, D, he could always switch to GoDaddy. They don't give a damn what you do. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Macro photography competition and prize | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital Photography | 0 | July 23rd 07 12:31 AM |
Macro photography competition and prize | Wayne J. Cosshall | Photographing Nature | 0 | July 23rd 07 12:31 AM |
Macro photography competition and prize | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital ZLR Cameras | 0 | July 23rd 07 12:31 AM |
Macro photography competition and prize | Wayne J. Cosshall | Digital SLR Cameras | 0 | July 23rd 07 12:31 AM |
Digital Infrared Photography Competition February Winner and Grand Prize Winner | Annika1980 | Digital Photography | 0 | April 13th 07 03:52 PM |