Vance? Where's YOUR Handheld Insects in Flight Macro Photos?!?

Hey Vance, we're all still waiting to see what you can do with that piece
of **** DSLR of yours. It was YOUR challenge. Are you still going to
pussy-out on it?


LOL!

On 6/3/10 5:35 AM, in article ,
"LOL!" wrote:


Hey Vance, we're all still waiting to see what you can do with that piece
of **** DSLR of yours. It was YOUR challenge. Are you still going to
pussy-out on it?


LOL!

Shut the **** up. You're yesterday's news. Get used to it...

On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 17:14:15 -0700 (PDT), Vance
wrote:

On Jun 3, 3:35*am, LOL! wrote:
Hey Vance, we're all still waiting to see what you can do with that piece
of **** DSLR of yours. It was YOUR challenge. Are you still going to
pussy-out on it?

LOL!

Yes, it's my challenge to you to show that the shot is a 'cinch' taken
the way you describe.
The subject matter and conditions are chosen so that you can't lie
about the image as you tried to do with all the others. Since you'er
the one making the assertions and claims, you're the one that needs to
back them up.

No cooling an insect down and taking picture after picture while it
warms up and takes off or other techniques and then claiming you got
it through the superiority of your P&S camera and highly developed
skill set.

Also, remember, you're claiming a MACRO shot and you're composing and
keeping a changing focal point according to your claims. Also, you're
implying that you are taking the 'cinch' shots of an insect already in
free flight. My challenge to you is to produce an image that supports
all that including the EXIF info and a commonly available insect. A
house fly, with it's transparent wings (to make it harder to photoshop
a composite), and an identifiable (even though blurred) background to
provide supporting context, would let you strut your stuff.

Since I haven't made any claims that have to be supported, there isn't
any challenge for me to meet.

The key thing is producing a macro image of an insect ALREADY in free
flight before you click the shutter. One that isn't prone to hovering
like a bee or dragonfly and the visual context supports the image
being taken in a natural environment.

Vance

As I already said, AND PROVED with photographic evidence, it's already been
done. By myself. With HANDHELD P&S CAMERAS. MANY MANY TIMES! Any LCD
viewfinder essential to be able to accomplish this task. Remember? That's
what started your ignorant and inexperienced whining of a troll. You
claiming that an LCD viewfinder is useless. (Because you don't even know
how to use one to your benefit.)

Now, where's your proof that you can do the same with your PIECE OF ****
DSLRs?!?

LOL!

I just love watching you continuing to make a total fool of yourself.

Do it some more!

Can you show us some more of your panoramas where buildings are tilted
every which way because you don't even know how to do something that simple
the correct way? Those are a HOOT!

LOL!

On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 19:18:58 -0700 (PDT), Vance
wrote:

By the way, post an image
that you have taken which meets the criteria for an insect already in
free flight in a natural context taken handheld.

Already done. MANY MANY TIMES. Did you also miss the one of the 4mm long
insect in flight taken with a 10x close-up lens on a handheld P&S camera
also using available light? That's my all-time favorite. The greatest test
of handheld macrophotography of insects-in-flight in available light alone
with which I've ever challenged myself. The insect in perfect focus filling
the full frame. I love that shot. A pure testament to where skill, combined
with the proper tools, can achieve anything.

So you missed my posting of that shot last year? Where all the trolls just
like you jumped around like fools for a week claiming I stole that shot, or
edited the EXIF, or must have taken it with a DSLR? (Just like you did this
last time, claiming I steal photos, when in fact you PROVED that you are
the one that steals others photos.) **** that was funny last year. Still
is! LOL!

(btw: my lawyers are assessing your worth, so far it looks like you don't
own ****)

Snooze, ya lose! You snapshooting ****wad of a **** troll!

Do you always lie this much just to troll a newsgroup?

LOL!

On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 20:48:49 -0700 (PDT), Vance
wrote:


Which images did I steal? Please be specific so that I can put them
back up and have you confirm that they have been stolen and/or
misattributed. It will be a big help if you are specific.

No need for you to put them (it) back up.

Path:npeersf02.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!t34g2000prd.googlegr oups.com!not-for-mail
From: Vance
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: LOL just gets funnier all the time!!
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 20:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 29
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.181.16.69
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1275534765 14353 127.0.0.1 (3 Jun 2010 03:12:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 03:12:45 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:
Injection-Info: t34g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.181.16.69;
posting-account=ejyEEQkAAAAQnuehVcPyE-YJiDRW95u9
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
Trident/4.0; GTB6.5; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR
3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.2),gzip(gfe)
Xref: core-iad-easynews rec.photo.digital:683997
X-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 03:12:45 UTC (s02-b29.iad)

KOK, AKA, AKA, ad infinitum got caught lieing about another of his
images. He came back with his usual response, which is insult and
distraction, etc. The usual stuff when he gets caught with his pants
down. That makes it 5/5 my favor. He pulled it down, but here is the
shot:

http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo...eat=directlink

Downsized copy of original will copyright notification "Photographs are the
copyrighted property of each photographer listed. Contact individual
photographers for permission to use for any purpose." is found on this
page:

http://mothphotographersgroup.msstat...p?hodges=08262

I retain the full-size image (with many similar images in the set) to prove
you have stolen it for your own purposes. You do understand the words "for
any purpose", do you not?

I could easily report you for theft and copyright infringement to
picasa.google abuse department with a few mouse-clicks, but they'd only
demand you remove it or close your account. I've played this game before
with useless basement-life ****head trolls like you, many times. Reporting
you to google is just not as profitable to me. And you wouldn't have
learned a damn thing. You'd continue to steal photos of others for your own
use, just as you always have.

LOL!!!!!!

On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 20:48:49 -0700 (PDT), Vance
wrote:


Which images did I steal? Please be specific so that I can put them
back up and have you confirm that they have been stolen and/or
misattributed. It will be a big help if you are specific.

No need for you to put them (it) back up.

Path:npeersf02.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!postnews.google.com!t34g2000prd.googlegr oups.com!not-for-mail
From: Vance
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital
Subject: LOL just gets funnier all the time!!
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 20:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 29
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.181.16.69
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1275534765 14353 127.0.0.1 (3 Jun 2010 03:12:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 03:12:45 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:
Injection-Info: t34g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.181.16.69;
posting-account=ejyEEQkAAAAQnuehVcPyE-YJiDRW95u9
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
Trident/4.0; GTB6.5; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR
3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; InfoPath.2),gzip(gfe)
Xref: core-iad-easynews rec.photo.digital:683997
X-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 03:12:45 UTC (s02-b29.iad)

KOK, AKA, AKA, ad infinitum got caught lieing about another of his
images. He came back with his usual response, which is insult and
distraction, etc. The usual stuff when he gets caught with his pants
down. That makes it 5/5 my favor. He pulled it down, but here is the
shot:

http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo...eat=directlink

Downsized copy of original with copyright notification "Photographs are the
copyrighted property of each photographer listed. Contact individual
photographers for permission to use for any purpose." is found on this
page:

http://mothphotographersgroup.msstat...p?hodges=08262

I retain the full-size image (with many similar images in the set) to prove
you have stolen it for your own purposes. You do understand the words "for
any purpose", do you not?

I could easily report you for theft and copyright infringement to
picasa.google abuse department with a few mouse-clicks, but they'd only
demand you remove it or close your account. I've played this game before
with useless basement-life ****head trolls like you, many times. Reporting
you to google is just not as profitable to me. And you wouldn't have
learned a damn thing. You'd continue to steal photos of others for your own
use, just as you always have.

LOL!!!!!!