Serious question from a skeptic - practical realities of taking clearvideo/stills of UFO's?

Pudentame wrote:
Rick Merrill wrote:
... The theory department would
hatch up some outlandish idea,

"theory department" ? Give me a break.

Hasn't this gotten sufficiently OT yet?



Depends on where you're posting from.

From r.p.e.35mm perspective, it doesn't hold a candle to some of the
other bull**** threads we endure. ;-D

LOL!

Dear Doc:

On Feb 19, 3:41*pm, Doc wrote:
...
I'm wondering why it is, in all the incidents of "UFO"
sightings, including some that have made the news,
any images that aren't obvious hoaxes (and many
that are) are always grainy, shaky, indistinct blobs
blurs, pinpoint lights etc.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/0...tml#cnnSTCText
... select the second picture.

This was an event they knew was coming, could put all sorts of
resources into documenting, and was only x2 to x5 further away than
some the "effects" you complain about (and "straight" out of the
atmosphere).

Not to restart a fire here...

David A. Smith