If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Polacolor 'effect' ?
what color film would you use if you were a fan of the "polaroid look (type
108/6668/sx70" but wanted something a neg or transparency any fans out there ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Polacolor 'effect' ?
fgphotog wrote:
what color film would you use if you were a fan of the "polaroid look (type 108/6668/sx70" but wanted something a neg or transparency any fans out there ? I use several Polaroid films, and find they have a unique look. With the Time Zero films, about the closest that emulates that is using Kodak Ektachrome 64 Tungsten and an 81A filter. Of course, the easiest non-Polaroid way to do this is in PhotoShop, and any film will work. The variety of Polaroid films currently available (peel apart films) is fairly good currently. Each has a slightly different look to it. In general, I find that Polaroid films can be a bit cool in colour temperature, and tend to render bluish tones, especially in shadows. The other noticeable trait is that most are a bit low in contrast, though there are exceptions. Why would you want the look of Polaroid film without using Polaroid films? Old cameras and Polaroid printers are fairly low cost, and widely available used. Also, there is quite a bit more experimenting possible with the actual real Polaroid films. Fuji gave me some of their Instant films to try out. If I get around to trying these, I will try to post my impressions to this group, or at least one of the r.p.equipment groups. Ciao! Gordon Moat Alliance Graphique Studio http://www.allgstudio.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Polacolor 'effect' ?
:
what color film would you use if you were a fan of the "polaroid look (type 108/6668/sx70" but wanted something a neg or transparency any fans out there ? ================================================== ==== I use several Polaroid films, and find they have a unique look. With the Time Zero films, about the closest that emulates that is using Kodak Ektachrome 64 Tungsten and an 81A filter. Of course, the easiest non-Polaroid way to do this is in PhotoShop, and any film will work. The variety of Polaroid films currently available (peel apart films) is fairly good currently. Each has a slightly different look to it. In general, I find that Polaroid films can be a bit cool in colour temperature, and tend to render bluish tones, especially in shadows. The other noticeable trait is that most are a bit low in contrast, though there are exceptions. Why would you want the look of Polaroid film without using Polaroid films? Old cameras and Polaroid printers are fairly low cost, and widely available used. Also, there is quite a bit more experimenting possible with the actual real Polaroid films. Fuji gave me some of their Instant films to try out. If I get around to trying these, I will try to post my impressions to this group, or at least one of the r.p.equipment groups. Ciao! Gordon Moat ========================================== Well it's interesting what you say. Firstly about using any film and photoshop - I find it hard to simulate the Polacolor look this way. It's not just a case of desaturating and sliding the colour balance around. Not sure what I'm missing. I dont want to use the actual Polaroid films because many that I took years ago have faded even though they were kept in the dark etc. I want something more permanent and I would like more than one copy of a successful print :-) You're right about the low contrast, and it's the "porcelain" quality to skin tones that I love. Frank |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Polacolor 'effect' ?
fgphotog wrote:
:. . .. . . . . Hi Frank, Well it's interesting what you say. Firstly about using any film and photoshop - I find it hard to simulate the Polacolor look this way. It's not just a case of desaturating and sliding the colour balance around. Not sure what I'm missing. There is nothing easy about doing this . . . unfortunately. I have about nine years of PhotoShop experience, and I do this for a living. Sometimes I forget that what I consider easy may not be that way. I wish I had a nice explanation of how to do this, but this is something that would be easier to view over someone's shoulder, than try to explain it. A few hints are using layers, layer blending, the Hue/Saturation controls, but unfortunately every image is a little different. I dont want to use the actual Polaroid films because many that I took years ago have faded even though they were kept in the dark etc. I want something more permanent and I would like more than one copy of a successful print :-) I feel the same way, especially with the transfer and lifts that I have done, or had on display. The unique one off nature is sort of nice, but I would still like it to be around many years from now. With the SX70 manipulations, they are just too small. A couple of options are high resolution flat scanning, and setting up a copy stand. With the copy stand, this involves getting the image onto some other film. The ideal would be 4x5 film, though I just did a few test copies onto 35 mm film, and they seem to work okay. A copy image gains a bit of contrast, though perhaps adjusting the film type might help. That contrast increase could be avoided with a high resolution flat scan. With scanning, you would need to adjust the colours to match the original, and a print off that file may be slightly different. Mostly, the flat scan method can be a great way to get good enlargements. You're right about the low contrast, and it's the "porcelain" quality to skin tones that I love. Frank I find this more with the B/W Polaroid films than the colour choices. Part of the effect is the large size, and part of it is the slight lower resolution of the prints. The P/N films are a different area, and the negative can give some really nice looking enlargements. Also, a good source of scanned and printed (published) Polaroid images is P Magazine. This is available from Polaroid, and contains images that used Polaroid films in some way. The printing quality and paper are really great. More information is at: http://www.polaroid.com/landing/landing.jsp?FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=2534374302023864 &bmUID=1062052905072&PRDREG=null And click on the P Magazine link. There are two issues put out each year, and you should be able to get the current issue for free. Ciao! Gordon Moat Alliance Graphique Studio http://www.allgstudio.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Polacolor 'effect' ?
thanks for all this
Hi Frank, Well it's interesting what you say. Firstly about using any film and photoshop - I find it hard to simulate the Polacolor look this way. It's not just a case of desaturating and sliding the colour balance around. Not sure what I'm missing. There is nothing easy about doing this . . . unfortunately. I have about nine years of PhotoShop experience, and I do this for a living. Sometimes I forget that what I consider easy may not be that way. I wish I had a nice explanation of how to do this, but this is something that would be easier to view over someone's shoulder, than try to explain it. A few hints are using layers, layer blending, the Hue/Saturation controls, but unfortunately every image is a little different. I dont want to use the actual Polaroid films because many that I took years ago have faded even though they were kept in the dark etc. I want something more permanent and I would like more than one copy of a successful print :-) I feel the same way, especially with the transfer and lifts that I have done, or had on display. The unique one off nature is sort of nice, but I would still like it to be around many years from now. With the SX70 manipulations, they are just too small. A couple of options are high resolution flat scanning, and setting up a copy stand. With the copy stand, this involves getting the image onto some other film. The ideal would be 4x5 film, though I just did a few test copies onto 35 mm film, and they seem to work okay. A copy image gains a bit of contrast, though perhaps adjusting the film type might help. That contrast increase could be avoided with a high resolution flat scan. With scanning, you would need to adjust the colours to match the original, and a print off that file may be slightly different. Mostly, the flat scan method can be a great way to get good enlargements. You're right about the low contrast, and it's the "porcelain" quality to skin tones that I love. Frank I find this more with the B/W Polaroid films than the colour choices. Part of the effect is the large size, and part of it is the slight lower resolution of the prints. The P/N films are a different area, and the negative can give some really nice looking enlargements. Also, a good source of scanned and printed (published) Polaroid images is P Magazine. This is available from Polaroid, and contains images that used Polaroid films in some way. The printing quality and paper are really great. More information is at: http://www.polaroid.com/landing/land...r_id=253437430 2023864&bmUID=1062052905072&PRDREG=null And click on the P Magazine link. There are two issues put out each year, and you should be able to get the current issue for free. Ciao! Gordon Moat Alliance Graphique Studio http://www.allgstudio.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|