If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
which film which lab
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:46:08 -0400, "Dave Scott"
wrote: Try York Photo. http://www.yorkphoto.com/. I have been using them for years with great results. i am glad you have. York recently started processing all film sent to Mystic. While Mystic's quality has suffered in recent years, the stuff that comes back from York is attrocious. Suitable for 40 dollar point and shoots and that is about it. They are cheap! And you get what you pay for. Jim |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
which film which lab
So is this from personal experience or is this something you heard from
someone who heard it from someone else. As with anything, you shouldn't comment unless you know what you are talking about. There is nothing atrocious about Yorks processing. Of course I would not use them for any pro work I do but I do use them for my own personal photos. I have found way too often that people "bad mouth" labs without having any real personal experience with them. And by the way, if I am not mistaken, the original poster was looking for a cheap lab and was not too concerned with quality. "Jim Nason" wrote in message ... On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:46:08 -0400, "Dave Scott" wrote: Try York Photo. http://www.yorkphoto.com/. I have been using them for years with great results. i am glad you have. York recently started processing all film sent to Mystic. While Mystic's quality has suffered in recent years, the stuff that comes back from York is attrocious. Suitable for 40 dollar point and shoots and that is about it. They are cheap! And you get what you pay for. Jim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
which film which lab
"Dave Scott" wrote in message ... So is this from personal experience or is this something you heard from someone who heard it from someone else. As with anything, you shouldn't comment unless you know what you are talking about. There is nothing atrocious about Yorks processing. Of course I would not use them for any pro work I do but I do use them for my own personal photos. I have found way too often that people "bad mouth" labs without having any real personal experience with them. And by the way, if I am not mistaken, the original poster was looking for a cheap lab and was not too concerned with quality. and what if he was speaking of his own experiences there? that would make your entire post moot. haha! and why do you care if he's been there or not? i've never been to the icon (la lab), but from what i've seen of their work, they suck ass. i'll never go there. -- ******************* "Who died and made you Renfield?" W.W.S.D? www.Motochrist.net www.AliceCooper.com www.AliceCooperEBay.com **Send complaints to: ** |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Develper for Delta-100 | Frank Pittel | In The Darkroom | 8 | March 1st 04 04:36 PM |
Will we always be able to buy film? | Phil Glaser | In The Darkroom | 30 | January 28th 04 05:11 PM |
NEW FILM RECORDING-KINESCOPE 4K IN MADRID | 7 | In The Darkroom | 0 | January 27th 04 03:53 PM |
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? | Michael Weinstein, M.D. | In The Darkroom | 13 | January 24th 04 09:51 PM |
(newbie) What film most accurately reflects what we see? | Adrian | Film & Labs | 12 | October 22nd 03 03:22 PM |