If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
lenses that are too liberal A depth of field UNcalculator
How about just shooting digital, and bracket for DoF? Or knock one at
optimum aperture, and one more at minimum? Doesn't Rodenstock make a calculator for the PDA-impaired? "Bob Monaghan" wrote in message ... well, the formulas for DOF calculators are readily available, viz., http://medfmt.8k.com/brondof.html has javascript on that page and so on; if you have a hyperfocal distance, you can just use one formula, viz. see http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/hyperfocal.html for more on DOF math, see Michael Davis article on subject at http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/dofmath.html and followup with Harold Merk. if you are like me, you may prefer a graphical solution? http://www.dof.pcraft.com/dof-frames.cgi given you know the lens focal length and film format, you can simply iterate CoC values in a flexible DOF calculator spreadsheet to determine the mfger's COC values used in creating the table (or lens) values An excellent example would be Michael Davis' not just another DOF calculator ;-) at http://home.online.no/~gjon/mdofcal9.xls After that, it is just a matter of iterating on COC until the table matches the printed chart. ===== Liberal Lenses (w.r.t. DOF) that said, I usually don't use DOF charts in the field, though they are usually in the manuals which I do have with me, so I tend to rely on the lens DOF markings but using generally a stop more conservative DOF points. But as noted, not all lens makers use the same DOF COC values, so lenses also tend to have more or less conservative DOF markings, depending on which mfger or production run they represent (e.g., vivitars may vary between makers even if still a 28mm f/2.8 basic lens ;-). So in this case, it may be useful or important to note that a particular lens provides a more liberal DOF range for a given f/stop and distance setting. When this is the case, I mark in my own DOF markings as a warning to me that the DOF markings on that lens is too liberal and I should derate the indicated DOF by the amount shown by my added "tic" marks. This is esp. important if you intend to do hyperfocal shots to be blown up very large (beyond the point expected by most mfgers, e.g., 8x10" in many cases?)... hth bobm -- ************************************************** ********************* * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply************************* |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
lenses that are too liberal A depth of field UNcalculator
In article ,
"MikeWhy" wrote: Doesn't Rodenstock make a calculator for the PDA-impaired? Yes, one side calculates DOF for level or inclined cameras at any ratio between 1:1 and 1:20 + infinity. It sets CoC by choosing a film setting from 35mm to 810 on the dial. It also has a mm scale to measure displacement of the lens and the image on the viewing screen (some of these a PDA would not do. + the calculator is faster then on my Tungsten C). The other side calculates Scheimpflug for and format from 35mm to 8x10. -- To reply no_ HPMarketing Corp. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thanks so much for the Depth of Field help!!! | Michael P Gabriel | Digital Photography | 0 | June 27th 04 08:35 PM |
Depth of Field Preview Question: | Michael P Gabriel | Digital Photography | 6 | June 25th 04 11:29 PM |
Depth of Field is Enough to Negate Parallel Issues?????? | Dr. Slick | Large Format Photography Equipment | 10 | March 1st 04 08:40 PM |
RB67 Depth of Field with Extension Tube | TWW | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 1 | February 29th 04 03:21 PM |
Depth of field and Diffraction | John Hendry | Large Format Photography Equipment | 11 | January 21st 04 08:31 PM |