If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think good IBIS matters? Take a look at this guy's comparison
In article 1270b29e-e74a-45f2-b620-
, says... Sony A7II (5-axis) versus Olympus. AND just imagine if they added another camera without IBIS!! https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60293258 Actually his results are not terribly impressive. Here is what I get with my Olympus E-M1 II with the 12-100 lens: https://www.molon.de/images/P2190202.JPG 12mm, 6 seconds, handheld Stabilisation: 6 * 24 = 144 = 7 stops (1/ 35m focal length as reference exposure time) https://www.molon.de/images/P2240327.jpg 12mm, 3.2 seconds, handheld Stabilisation: 3.2 * 24 = 77 = more than 6 stops https://www.molon.de/images/P5263785.JPG 44mm, 1.6 seconds, handheld Stabilisation: 1.6 * 88 = 141 = 7 stops For the last one I was on the balcony, pointing the camera to the fireworks in P mode, not expecting anything, in the end getting that result. -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at https://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ https://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think good IBIS matters? Take a look at this guy'scomparison
On 04/05/2019 10:51, Alfred Molon wrote:
In article 1270b29e-e74a-45f2-b620- , says... Sony A7II (5-axis) versus Olympus. AND just imagine if they added another camera without IBIS!! https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/60293258 Actually his results are not terribly impressive. Here is what I get with my Olympus E-M1 II with the 12-100 lens: https://www.molon.de/images/P2190202.JPG 12mm, 6 seconds, handheld Stabilisation: 6 * 24 = 144 = 7 stops (1/ 35m focal length as reference exposure time) https://www.molon.de/images/P2240327.jpg 12mm, 3.2 seconds, handheld Stabilisation: 3.2 * 24 = 77 = more than 6 stops https://www.molon.de/images/P5263785.JPG 44mm, 1.6 seconds, handheld Stabilisation: 1.6 * 88 = 141 = 7 stops For the last one I was on the balcony, pointing the camera to the fireworks in P mode, not expecting anything, in the end getting that result. I especially like the last one! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think good IBIS matters? Take a look at this guy's comparison
Alfred Molon:
... 12mm, 6 seconds, handheld No, I don't think "good IBIS" is irrelevant. You're obsessed with persuading us that our camera bodies sans IBIS are useless, and that makes the matter relevant to you. In 53 years of making photos I have never had occasion to make a long, hand-held exposure. I have a selection of tripods and equatorial telescope mounts (can you hand-hold and track stars for 15 minutes with IBIS?) I only very rarely that I have occasion to use IS. So your IBIS is of no interest to me at this time. Thanks for your concern for my immortal soul, though. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think good IBIS matters? Take a look at this guy's comparison
In article ,
says... You're obsessed with persuading us that our camera bodies sans IBIS are useless, No, they are not useless. It's just that IBIS makes them more capable, i.e. extends the usage envelope. -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at https://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ https://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think good IBIS matters? Take a look at this guy'scomparison
On 05/05/2019 00:02, Davoud wrote:
Alfred Molon: ... 12mm, 6 seconds, handheld No, I don't think "good IBIS" is irrelevant. You're obsessed with persuading us that our camera bodies sans IBIS are useless, and that makes the matter relevant to you. In 53 years of making photos I have never had occasion to make a long, hand-held exposure. I have a selection of tripods and equatorial telescope mounts (can you hand-hold and track stars for 15 minutes with IBIS?) I only very rarely that I have occasion to use IS. So your IBIS is of no interest to me at this time. Thanks for your concern for my immortal soul, though. In balance . . . it also helps in low light and at distance. If you don't happen to own wide lenses, IBIS (and ILIS) can save the day if you like to take pictures under those circumstances. And weight and money. I accept that you don't (and you don't mind the weight or cost) - but you're not everybody. -- Cheers, Rob |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think good IBIS matters? Take a look at this guy's comparison
In article , Alfred
Molon wrote: You're obsessed with persuading us that our camera bodies sans IBIS are useless, No, they are not useless. It's just that IBIS makes them more capable, i.e. extends the usage envelope. same for ilis. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think good IBIS matters? Take a look at this guy's comparison
Alfred Molon:
...IBIS... extends the usage envelope. "Extends the usage envelope!?" I think I'll try to forget I read that. You're really hung up on this, aren't you? Are you by any chance the inventor and patent holder for IBIS? That would explain your obsessive posting on its supposed virtues. -- I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that you will say in your entire life. usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No IBIS for Fuji and Sony APC makes about as much sense as how long Nikon and Canon decided to wait before going mirrorless | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 0 | April 26th 19 01:21 AM |
No IBIS for Fuji and Sony APC makes about as much sense as how long Nikon and Canon decided to wait before going mirrorless | Bill W | Digital Photography | 8 | April 19th 19 05:58 AM |
Canon mirrorless. No IBIS. I'd never buy a modern camera like that | Bill W | Digital Photography | 2 | September 6th 18 05:54 AM |
Good comparison reviews of digital cameras | D | Digital Photo Equipment For Sale | 1 | May 4th 04 05:22 PM |