If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
does this mean I need a flash unit too?
I just got a Nikon f/2.8 70-200 to use with my D50. The lens is fantastic.
At least now, I can shoot football games at night. What I would really like to be able to do is freeze action. In a football game it doesn't really matter but in a volleyball or basketball game, I'd like to be as discreet as possible and not use a flash. The shutter speeds required to freeze action just result in a very dark picture or complete blackness. Small town high school gyms and football fields are not very well list (at least for a camera). So, my dilema is... am I going to have to bite the bullet and get a flash unit? If so, what kind should I get. I noticed a guy at the football game on Friday had, what I thought, was a strobe flash mounted on his camera. I didn't get a chance to ask him about it, though. I'm pretty much a newbie at this and I have other beginner issues as well. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
does this mean I need a flash unit too?
I just got a Nikon f/2.8 70-200 to use with my D50. The lens is fantastic.
At least now, I can shoot football games at night. What I would really like to be able to do is freeze action. In a football game it doesn't really matter but in a volleyball or basketball game, I'd like to be as discreet as possible and not use a flash. The shutter speeds required to freeze action just result in a very dark picture or complete blackness. Small town high school gyms and football fields are not very well list (at least for a camera). So, my dilema is... am I going to have to bite the bullet and get a flash unit? If so, what kind should I get. I noticed a guy at the football game on Friday had, what I thought, was a strobe flash mounted on his camera. I didn't get a chance to ask him about it, though. I'm pretty much a newbie at this and I have other beginner issues as well. If you get a flash, you're still going to be too far away to use it unmodified, but a "Better Beamer" will give you the reach you need, they work amazingly well. However, there's a very good chance that you aren't allowed to use such a rig, you should probably check whether it's alright before you go out and buy one. Otherwise, set your aperture at f/2.8, and crank up that ISO! steve |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
does this mean I need a flash unit too?
JimO wrote:
I just got a Nikon f/2.8 70-200 to use with my D50. The lens is fantastic. At least now, I can shoot football games at night. What I would really like to be able to do is freeze action. In a football game it doesn't really matter but in a volleyball or basketball game, I'd like to be as discreet as possible and not use a flash. The shutter speeds required to freeze action just result in a very dark picture or complete blackness. Small town high school gyms and football fields are not very well list (at least for a camera). So, my dilema is... am I going to have to bite the bullet and get a flash unit? If so, what kind should I get. I noticed a guy at the football game on Friday had, what I thought, was a strobe flash mounted on his camera. I didn't get a chance to ask him about it, though. I'm pretty much a newbie at this and I have other beginner issues as well. I will make two suggestions. First if you are going to get a flash that is going to do any real good, you are going to need a really powerful flash. Second, in my opinion images made without flash, look better than with flash. With flash you loose some of the effect of motion and I don't like the ghost effect you often get with flash under these conditions. Last, when photographing an event, I don't like to become part of the event. The best compliment I can get is someone commenting on my good pictures and adding that they did not even know someone what photographing the event. -- Joseph Meehan Dia duit |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
does this mean I need a flash unit too?
In article . net, JimO
wrote: So, my dilema is... am I going to have to bite the bullet and get a flash unit? If so, what kind should I get. I noticed a guy at the football game on Friday had, what I thought, was a strobe flash mounted on his camera. I didn't get a chance to ask him about it, though. The amount of flash illumination you'll need at a normal distance from an outdoor, night time game makes the project impractical. In addition to the sheer distance, you'll need MUCH more light than a simple Guide Number calculation would indicate, because you have no walls or ceiling reflecting it back towards the subject. The same situation would make the flash lighting very harsh and unpleasant. Concentrators such as the Better Beamer would help, but not enough - they're primarily for fill illumination, and the BB in particular is intended for 300mm lenses or longer. BTW, 99.9% of the people you see using flash at events like this are operating in blissful ignorance (or have flashes they don't know how to turn off) The flash isn't doing anything useful. Just crank up the ISO as high as you can and see what happens. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
does this mean I need a flash unit too?
Steve Wolfe wrote:
If you get a flash, you're still going to be too far away to use it unmodified, but a "Better Beamer" will give you the reach you need, they work amazingly well. The Better Beamer type devices concentrate the flash field of coverage quite a bit and with full frame they will vignette at focal lengths under 300 mm, so probably not a good idea with his 70-200 mm lens ... even with the 'crop factor' he's right at the vignette limit at his longest focal length and won't be able to use this lens at all if he's zoomed under 200 mm. Bill (used a Beamer for years but usually with 500 mm or greater lenses) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
does this mean I need a flash unit too?
If you get a flash, you're still going to be too far away to use it
unmodified, but a "Better Beamer" will give you the reach you need, they work amazingly well. The Better Beamer type devices concentrate the flash field of coverage quite a bit and with full frame they will vignette at focal lengths under 300 mm, so probably not a good idea with his 70-200 mm lens ... even with the 'crop factor' he's right at the vignette limit at his longest focal length and won't be able to use this lens at all if he's zoomed under 200 mm. With a 200mm lens on my Reb XT, the better beamer doesn't quite fill the frame vertically, but does horizontally. So far, in shooting various things (but only once for football), the falloff to the top and bottom haven't bothered me. If he really wanted full coverage, he could set his flash-head at a sub-optimal distance, which (according to tests I've seen, but never bothered to try) can widen the beam a bit. steve |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
does this mean I need a flash unit too?
"JimO" wrote in
ink.net: I just got a Nikon f/2.8 70-200 to use with my D50. The lens is fantastic. At least now, I can shoot football games at night. What I would really like to be able to do is freeze action. In a football game it doesn't really matter but in a volleyball or basketball game, I'd like to be as discreet as possible and not use a flash. The shutter speeds required to freeze action just result in a very dark picture or complete blackness. Small town high school gyms and football fields are not very well list (at least for a camera). So, my dilema is... am I going to have to bite the bullet and get a flash unit? If so, what kind should I get. I noticed a guy at the football game on Friday had, what I thought, was a strobe flash mounted on his camera. I didn't get a chance to ask him about it, though. I'm pretty much a newbie at this and I have other beginner issues as well. I've been asking similar questions to yours. I have yet to buy the dSLR, but am also looking at the Nikon D50 pretty seriously. You can Google my name in rec.photo.digital and see the responses to all my questions. It looks like the most popular response to my questions about indoor volleyball is to get a better piece of glass. The 85mm f1.8 was a popular choice among the people who responded to my questions. Basically, you want to have a fast lens. Your lens is f2.8 - is that all the way thru 200mm? Seems that most people suggest going with an f1.8, or maybe even an f1.4 for this situation. Well, instead of me blabbing about something I know little of, just check out my recent posts about the subject, and read what the others have said. Maybe there's a way to get your lens to work well enough, without using flash. I have no idea. I'm a newbie, too. Other than that, how do you like the D50? Good luck! -- Eric Babula Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
does this mean I need a flash unit too?
"JimO" wrote in message ink.net... I just got a Nikon f/2.8 70-200 to use with my D50. The lens is fantastic. At least now, I can shoot football games at night. What I would really like to be able to do is freeze action. In a football game it doesn't really matter but in a volleyball or basketball game, I'd like to be as discreet as possible and not use a flash. The shutter speeds required to freeze action just result in a very dark picture or complete blackness. Generally speaking I find a shutter speed of around 1/250th is best for volleyball. It has a tendency to freeze the players action, but allow some movement of the ball to give a sense of the action involved. What aperture, shutter, and ISO values are you using for your shots? Here you can see the player is frozen nicely, but the ball appears to be moving in at rocket speed. http://andrewcrabtree.com/galleries/...s/_DSC2000.htm Compare it to this shot where the shutter was much faster and the entire image is frozen (I prefer the first one) http://andrewcrabtree.com/galleries/...s/_DSC2018.htm Nikon doesn't make any zooms faster than f2.8. Try boosting the ISO to 400/800/1600 and shoot at f2.8 and see if you can get shutter speeds fast enough. You could also try the 85/1.4 which is 2 stops faster than your zoom, but you are restricted to a single focal length. I would avoid using a flash if at all possible. Regards, Andrew |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flash unit for the D80 camera | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 11 | October 1st 06 01:16 AM |
Film SLR Flash unit on a Digital SLR - Possible? | alex | Digital Photography | 12 | June 24th 06 10:51 PM |
does my d70s have a flash problem? | hogges | Digital SLR Cameras | 14 | February 8th 06 05:10 AM |
[K-M - Sony] Damn! Now let's move on... | Alan Browne | Digital Photography | 121 | February 3rd 06 01:24 AM |
[K-M - Sony] Damn! Now let's move on... | Alan Browne | 35mm Photo Equipment | 134 | February 3rd 06 01:24 AM |