A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Techniques » Photographing Nature
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Telephoto Binocular Comparison



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old December 11th 03, 08:48 PM
Jeff Keller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Normal focal length - Was: Telephoto Binocular Comparison

There are wide angle lenses, there are telephoto lenses, and what is
in-between is a normal lens. It is in reality a marketing term that is
useful for communication. It has meaning, much more meaning than image
circle = focal length for the majority of camera users.

How closely it approximates what an eye actually sees can easily be argued
but nothing is gained by that. Few people would buy a camera that created
images that were identical to the instantaneous image the eye creates.

Everyday people buy digital cameras, not knowing the image sensor size. They
have a pretty good idea what a wide angle to short telephoto zoom means.
They don't care how easy it is to design or build or if a researcher uses
the same definition for wide angle, normal, nor telephoto. They have a
pretty good idea what they want the camera to do and want to talk to other
normal people about it.

-jeff


"Nicholas O. Lindan" wrote in message
link.net...

snip snip
Balderdash. They are 'normal' because that's the optimum point for lens
design: image circle = focal length. A 'normal' lens is the lens that
'normally' comes with the camera. A 'normal' lens has now become
a plastic-element 28-80 f4.5-6.9 atrocity.


[Web sites] I browsed stated [blah, blah, blah...]

snip snip

Who do you think knows something about recreating 'normal eye
perspective' on a (nominally) 2-D surface -- some yo-yo on the
web or Boeing, Lockheed, Matsu****a, Phillips, IBM Research,
PARC ...
--
Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.



  #22  
Old December 26th 03, 03:27 PM
bill harrison
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Telephoto Binocular Comparison

This is not exact, but with 35mm cameras, divide the focal length of your
telephoto by 50 to get an approximate degree of magnification thus a 100mm
lens / 50 = 2 or approximately 2x magnification. (a 48mm is roughly as the
eye sees it so dividing by 50 makes a fast "rule of thumb" approximation)
Your binoculars should state the magnification on the body.
Thus 10x binoculars would be approximately equal to a 500mm telephoto.


foto wrote in message
m...
I am in the process of buying a new pair of binoculars and wondered if

there
was any way to compare the focal length of a telephoto lens to the power
rating of binoculars. It would be nice to know how the scene I am looking
at thru the binoculars relates to my lens length.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Avigon telephoto bayonet double lens for Bay-1 TLR cameras klink Medium Format Photography Equipment 1 June 4th 04 06:51 PM
Comparison of developer components Mike Schuler In The Darkroom 2 May 30th 04 10:17 PM
Kodak UC100/Reala Comparison Bill Tuthill Film & Labs 12 April 20th 04 06:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.